Literature DB >> 22086664

Voluntary consent in correctional settings: do offenders feel coerced to participate in research?

John F Edens1, Monica Epstein, Paul G Stiles, Norman G Poythress.   

Abstract

A major ethical concern in research with criminal offenders is the potential for abuse due to coercive influences that may adversely affect offenders' capacity to give voluntary consent to participate in research conducted in correctional settings. Despite this concern, to date there have been almost no systematic scientific investigations of the extent to which offenders themselves perceive that coercion occurs in these settings or that it is likely to influence their decisions about research participation. In a sample of over 600 ethnically diverse men and women recruited from various prisons and community corrections facilities in Texas and Florida, we used a vignette-based survey concerning a hypothetical research project to measure and compare offenders' global perceptions of coercive processes, as well as the differential salience and perceived coercive influence of specific factors (e.g., coercion by other inmates, inducements from staff). Somewhat surprisingly, across multiple outcome measures our participants on average reported relatively little in the way of significant coercive influences on their capacity to make voluntary decisions concerning research participation. Implications and directions for future research on coercive influences in offender research are discussed. 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086664     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.1014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  6 in total

1.  Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision.

Authors:  Ashleigh A Allen; Donna T Chen; Richard J Bonnie; Tomohiro M Ko; Colleen E Suratt; Joshua D Lee; Peter D Friedmann; Michael Gordon; Ryan McDonald; Sean M Murphy; Tamara Y Boney; Edward V Nunes; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Exploitation of Prisoners in Clinical Research: Perceptions of Study Participants.

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Michael D Stein; Jennifer E Johnson; Josiah D Rich; Peter D Friedmann; Jennifer Clarke; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

3.  Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions?

Authors:  Paul P Christopher; Lorena G Garcia-Sampson; Michael Stein; Jennifer Johnson; Josiah Rich; Charles Lidz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Feasibility of hepatitis C virus testing and linkage in community supervision offices: Great potential but persistent challenges.

Authors:  Brendan P Jacka; Laurie B Bazerman; Collin Dickerson; Marc Moody; Johanna Martin; Emily Patry; Treniece Cady; Hacheming Compere; Matthew Boudreau; Curt G Beckwith
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Dysfunctional error-related processing in incarcerated youth with elevated psychopathic traits.

Authors:  J Michael Maurer; Vaughn R Steele; Lora M Cope; Gina M Vincent; Julia M Stephen; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  Sex differences in youth with mental health problems in inpatient, outpatient and youth justice settings.

Authors:  Shannon L Stewart; Elizabeth Thornley; Natalia Lapshina; Patricia Erickson; Evelyn Vingilis; Hayley Hamilton; Nathan Kolla
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.