Literature DB >> 28300615

Heritability of brain activity related to response inhibition: A longitudinal genetic study in adolescent twins.

Andrey P Anokhin1, Simon Golosheykin2, Julia D Grant2, Andrew C Heath2.   

Abstract

The ability to inhibit prepotent but context- or goal-inappropriate responses is essential for adaptive self-regulation of behavior. Deficits in response inhibition, a key component of impulsivity, have been implicated as a core dysfunction in a range of neuropsychiatric disorders such as ADHD and addictions. Identification of genetically transmitted variation in the neural underpinnings of response inhibition can help to elucidate etiological pathways to these disorders and establish the links between genes, brain, and behavior. However, little is known about genetic influences on the neural mechanisms of response inhibition during adolescence, a developmental period characterized by weak self-regulation of behavior. Here we investigated heritability of ERPs elicited in a Go/No-Go task in a large sample of adolescent twins assessed longitudinally at ages 12, 14, and 16. Genetic analyses showed significant heritability of inhibition-related frontal N2 and P3 components at all three ages, with 50 to 60% of inter-individual variability being attributable to genetic factors. These genetic influences included both common genetic factors active at different ages and novel genetic influences emerging during development. Finally, individual differences in the rate of developmental changes from age 12 to age 16 were significantly influenced by genetic factors. In conclusion, the present study provides the first evidence for genetic influences on neural correlates of response inhibition during adolescence and suggests that ERPs elicited in the Go/No-Go task can serve as intermediate neurophysiological phenotypes (endophenotypes) for the study of disinhibition and impulse control disorders.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Heritability; No-Go; Response inhibition; Twins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28300615      PMCID: PMC5454802          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  83 in total

1.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition.

Authors:  M Falkenstein; J Hoormann; J Hohnsbein
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI.

Authors:  K Rubia; S Overmeyer; E Taylor; M Brammer; S C Williams; A Simmons; C Andrew; E T Bullmore
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Neurobehavioral disinhibition in childhood predicts early age at onset of substance use disorder.

Authors:  Ralph E Tarter; Levent Kirisci; Ada Mezzich; Jack R Cornelius; Kathleen Pajer; Michael Vanyukov; William Gardner; Timothy Blackson; Duncan Clark
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.

Authors:  E Jodo; Y Kayama
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06

5.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

Review 6.  The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era.

Authors:  Jenny van Dongen; P Eline Slagboom; Harmen H M Draisma; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience.

Authors:  Christopher D Chambers; Hugh Garavan; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Functional brain imaging across development.

Authors:  Katya Rubia
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for abnormal preparatory states and inhibitory processing in adult ADHD.

Authors:  Gráinne McLoughlin; Bjoern Albrecht; Tobias Banaschewski; Aribert Rothenberger; Daniel Brandeis; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  9 in total

1.  A Model of Aggressive Behavior: Early Adversity, Impulsivity, and Response Inhibition.

Authors:  James W Madole; Sheri L Johnson; Charles S Carver
Journal:  J Aggress Maltreat Trauma       Date:  2019-04-03

2.  Single nucleotide polymorphism heritability and differential patterns of genetic overlap between inattention and four neurocognitive factors in youth.

Authors:  Lauren Micalizzi; Leslie A Brick; Marisa E Marraccini; Chelsie E Benca-Bachman; Rohan H C Palmer; Valerie S Knopik
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2021-02

3.  [Response inhibition and emotional responding in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with comorbid disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders].

Authors:  Xixi Jiang; Li Liu; Haifeng Ji; Ju Gao; Minmin Zhang; Yuncheng Zhu; Kaiyun Li; Weidong Ji; Guohai Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-01-30

4.  GABAergic polygenic risk for cocaine use disorder is negatively correlated with precuneus activity during cognitive control in African American individuals.

Authors:  Bao-Zhu Yang; Iris M Balodis; Hedy Kober; Patrick D Worhunsky; Cheryl M Lacadie; Joel Gelernter; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  The Role of Parent Self-Regulation in Youth Type 1 Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Katherine W Bauer; Marisa E Hilliard; Dana Albright; Sharon L Lo; Emily M Fredericks; Alison L Miller
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Test-Retest Reliability of Neural Correlates of Response Inhibition and Error Monitoring: An fMRI Study of a Stop-Signal Task.

Authors:  Ozlem Korucuoglu; Michael P Harms; Serguei V Astafiev; Semyon Golosheykin; James T Kennedy; Deanna M Barch; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  The utility of twins in developmental cognitive neuroscience research: How twins strengthen the ABCD research design.

Authors:  William G Iacono; Andrew C Heath; John K Hewitt; Michael C Neale; Marie T Banich; Monica M Luciana; Pamela A Madden; Deanna M Barch; James M Bjork
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.464

8.  No evidence of associations between ADHD and event-related brain potentials from a continuous performance task in a population-based sample of adolescent twins.

Authors:  Alex Lau-Zhu; Charlotte Tye; Frühling Rijsdijk; Grainne McLoughlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Large-scale collaboration in ENIGMA-EEG: A perspective on the meta-analytic approach to link neurological and psychiatric liability genes to electrophysiological brain activity.

Authors:  Dirk J A Smit; Ole A Andreassen; Dorret I Boomsma; Scott J Burwell; David B Chorlian; Eco J C de Geus; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Reyna L Gordon; Jeremy Harper; Ulrich Hegerl; Tilman Hensch; William G Iacono; Philippe Jawinski; Erik G Jönsson; Jurjen J Luykx; Cyrille L Magne; Stephen M Malone; Sarah E Medland; Jacquelyn L Meyers; Torgeir Moberget; Bernice Porjesz; Christian Sander; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Paul M Thompson; Catharina E M van Beijsterveldt; Edwin van Dellen; Marc Via; Margaret J Wright
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.