Literature DB >> 1375556

Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task.

E Jodo1, Y Kayama.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that a negative component (N2) of the event-related potential (ERP), whose peak latency is 200-300 msec after stimulus onset, may vary in amplitude depending on the neuronal activity required for response inhibition. To confirm this, ERPs were recorded in a Go/No-go paradigm in which subjects of one group (HI, n = 10) were asked to respond to Go stimuli with key pressing within a shorter period (less than 300 msec) than those of the other group (LI, n = 10) whose upper limit of the reaction time was relatively longer (less than 500 msec). All subjects had to withhold the Go response to the No-go stimuli without making overt muscle activities. The N2 component was recorded superposed on the initial descending limb of the P300 and other slow deflections, which were attenuated with a digital filter to measure the amplitude of N2. The N2 amplitude was significantly larger to the No-go stimulus than to the Go stimulus in both groups, but the N2 to the No-go stimulus was significantly larger in the HI group than in the LI group. These differences in N2 amplitude between conditions or groups were thought to be independent of other ERP components such as P300 and CNV. These results suggest that at least to some extent N2, which increased in amplitude when a greater effort was required to withhold the Go response, reflects the activity of a response inhibition system of the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1375556     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  101 in total

1.  An electrophysiological study of school-aged children with a history of failure to thrive during infancy.

Authors:  R A Dykman; P C Loizou; P T Ackerman; P H Casey; W B McPherson
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec

2.  The relationship between reaction time and response variability and somatosensory No-go potentials.

Authors:  Hiroki Nakata; Kiwako Sakamoto; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The role of brain oscillations as functional correlates of cognitive systems: a study of frontal inhibitory control in alcoholism.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Kevin A Jones; Keewhan Choi; David B Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-13

5.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Nick Yeung; Wery van den Wildenberg; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Asaid Khateb; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Removing an intersubject variance component in a general linear model improves multiway factoring of event-related spectral perturbations in group EEG studies.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Spence; Matthew R Brier; John Hart; Thomas C Ferree
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  A K Pandey; C Kamarajan; Y Tang; D B Chorlian; B N Roopesh; N Manz; A Stimus; M Rangaswamy; B Porjesz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Brain dynamics underlying training-induced improvement in suppressing inappropriate action.

Authors:  Aurelie L Manuel; Jeremy Grivel; Fosco Bernasconi; Micah M Murray; Lucas Spierer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Matthew R Brier; Patricia S Moore; Thomas C Ferree; Dylan Ray; Stewart Mostofsky; John Hart; Michael A Kraut
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.