| Literature DB >> 28298727 |
Stênio Burlin1, Larissa Rossini Favaro2, Elisa Almeida Sathler Bretas3, Lincoln Seiji Taniguchi2, Ana Paula Loch4, Marjorie Costa Argollo5, Orlando Ambrogini Junior6, Giuseppe D'Ippolito7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact that examiner experience has on the reproducibility and accuracy of computed tomography (CT) enterography in the detection of radiological signs in patients with Crohn's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Crohn disease; Reproducibility of results; Tomography, X-ray computed
Year: 2017 PMID: 28298727 PMCID: PMC5347498 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Bras ISSN: 0100-3984
Figure 1A: Note the thickened small loop with mucous enhancement (arrow) and the comb sign (arrowhead), corresponding to engorgement of the mesenteric arcade. B: The arrow indicates the area of ileal stenosis, with upstream dilation of the loops (asterisk). C: Note the fistula (arrow), characterized by a starred image corresponding to its pathway, creating a communication through the bowel loops in the right iliac fossa. D: In the region indicated by the arrows, note the mural stratification in the ileal loop, together with mucous enhancement, allowing us to distinguish among the various parietal layers.
Kappa test evaluation of agreement between examiners, by level of experience.
| Inexperienced | Experienced | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | κ | 95% CI | κ | 95% CI | κ | ||
| Densification | 0.62 | 0.44–0.80 | 0.60 | 0.42–0.79 | 0.61 | ||
| Wall thickness | 0.45 | 0.33–0.57 | 0.38 | 0.28–0.48 | 0.41 | ||
| Mucous enhancement | 0.55 | 0.37–0.73 | 0.69 | 0.51–0.87 | 0.62 | ||
| Stratification | 0.64 | 0.46–0.82 | 0.60 | 0.42–0.79 | 0.57 | ||
| Comb sign | 0.55 | 0.37–0.73 | 0.58 | 0.38–0.77 | 0.57 | ||
| Stenosis | 0.56 | 0.36–0.74 | 0.63 | 0.44–0.82 | 0.54 | ||
| Fistula | 0.44 | 0.07–0.81 | 0.19 | 0–0.45 | 0.33 | ||
| Lymph node number | 0.31 | 0–0.68 | 0.06 | 0–0.48 | 0 | ||
| Lymph node size | 0.09 | 0–0.46 | 0.17 | 0–0.60 | 0 | ||
95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the less experienced examiners (examiners A and B), the consensus evaluation of the experienced examiners being used as a reference.
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Interobserver agreement | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | κ | 95% CI | ||
| Densification | 0.62 | 0.44–0.80 | ||||||
| A | 90.5 | 71.1–97.4 | 89.9 | 81.3–94.8 | ||||
| B | 71.4 | 50.0–86.2 | 92.4 | 84.4–96.5 | ||||
| Wall thickness | 0.45 | 0.33–0.57 | ||||||
| A | 73.1 | 53.9–86.3 | 93.2 | 85.1–97.1 | ||||
| B | 76.9 | 58.0–89.0 | 91.0 | 81.7–95.3 | ||||
| Mucous enhancement | 0.55 | 0.37–0.73 | ||||||
| A | 89.3 | 72.8–96.3 | 87.0 | 77.7–92.8 | ||||
| B | 71.4 | 52.9–84.8 | 85.7 | 76.2–91.8 | ||||
| Stratification | 0.64 | 0.46–0.82 | ||||||
| A | 48.2 | 30.1–66.0 | 98.6 | 92.6–99.8 | ||||
| B | 66.7 | 47.8–81.4 | 97.3 | 90.1–99.3 | ||||
| Comb sign | 0.55 | 0.37–0.73 | ||||||
| A | 88.0 | 70.0–95.8 | 96.0 | 88.9–98.6 | ||||
| B | 56.0 | 37.1–73.3 | 94.7 | 87.1–97.9 | ||||
| Stenosis | 0.56 | 0.36–0.74 | ||||||
| A | 45.0 | 25.8–65.8 | 96.3 | 89.6–98.7 | ||||
| B | 50.0 | 29.9–70.1 | 98.8 | 93.3–99.8 | ||||
| Fistula | 0.44 | 0.07–0.81 | ||||||
| A | 42.9 | 21.4–67.4 | 100 | 61.0–100 | ||||
| B | 64.3 | 38.8–83.7 | 50.0 | 18.8–81.2 | ||||
| Lymph node number | 0.31 | 0.00–0.68 | ||||||
| A | 91.0 | 62.3–98.4 | 22.2 | 6.32–54.7 | ||||
| B | 100 | 74.1–100 | 22.2 | 6.32–54.7 | ||||
| Lymph node size | 0.09 | 0.00–0.46 | ||||||
| A | 63.6 | 35.4–84.8 | 44.4 | 18.8–73.3 | ||||
| B | 100 | 74.1–100 | 44.4 | 18.8–73.3 | ||||
95% CI, 95% confidence interval.