Literature DB >> 17384239

Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window--initial experience.

Sebastian T Schindera1, Rendon C Nelson, David M DeLong, Tracy A Jaffe, Elmar M Merkle, Erik K Paulson, John Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine quantitatively and qualitatively the timing of maximal enhancement of the normal small-bowel wall by using contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board. After information on radiation risk was given, written informed consent was obtained from 25 participants with no history of small-bowel disease (mean age, 58 years; 19 men) who had undergone single-level dynamic CT. Thirty seconds after the intravenous administration of contrast material, a serial dynamic acquisition, consisting of 10 images obtained 5 seconds apart, was performed. Enhancement measurements were obtained over time from the small-bowel wall and the aorta. Three independent readers qualitatively assessed small-bowel conspicuity. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed during the arterial phase, the enteric phase (which represented peak small-bowel mural enhancement), and the venous phase. Statistical analysis included paired Student t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. A P value less than .05 was used to indicate a significant difference.
RESULTS: The mean time to peak enhancement of the small-bowel wall was 49.3 seconds +/- 7.7 (standard deviation) and 13.5 seconds +/- 7.6 after peak aortic enhancement. Enhancement values were highest during the enteric phase (P < .05). Regarding small-bowel conspicuity, images obtained during the enteric phase were most preferred qualitatively; there was a significant difference between the enteric and arterial phases (P < .001) but not between the enteric and venous phases (P = .18).
CONCLUSION: At multi-detector row CT, peak mural enhancement of the normal small bowel occurs on average about 50 seconds after intravenous administration of contrast material or 14 seconds after peak aortic enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17384239     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Radiological Response Is Associated With Better Long-Term Outcomes and Is a Potential Treatment Target in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Parakkal Deepak; Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; John M Barlow; Shannon P Sheedy; Amy B Kolbe; William S Harmsen; Edward V Loftus; Stephanie L Hansel; Brenda D Becker; David H Bruining
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Feasibility of dose reduction using novel denoising techniques for low kV (80 kV) CT enterography: optimization and validation.

Authors:  Luís S Guimarães; Joel G Fletcher; Lifeng Yu; James E Huprich; Jeff L Fidler; Armando Manduca; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  CT enterography: review of technique and practical tips.

Authors:  R Ilangovan; D Burling; A George; A Gupta; M Marshall; S A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Predictors of Durability of Radiological Response in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Parakkal Deepak; Joel G Fletcher; Jeff L Fidler; John M Barlow; Shannon P Sheedy; Amy B Kolbe; William S Harmsen; Terry Therneau; Stephanie L Hansel; Brenda D Becker; Edward V Loftus; David H Bruining
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 5.325

5.  A prospective feasibility study of sub-millisievert abdominopelvic CT using iterative reconstruction in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Siobhan B O'Neill; Patrick D Mc Laughlin; Lee Crush; Owen J O'Connor; Sebastian R Mc Williams; Orla Craig; Anne Marie Mc Garrigle; Fiona O'Neill; Jackie Bye; Max F Ryan; Fergus Shanahan; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging for assessing Crohn׳s disease activity.

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham; Raymond K Cross
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07

Review 7.  Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in adult patients: multidetector row helical CT features.

Authors:  Aurélie Merlin; Philippe Soyer; Mourad Boudiaf; Lounis Hamzi; Roland Rymer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal MRI for Suspected Appendicitis: How We Do It.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Michael D Repplinger; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic performance of 64-section multiphase CT enterography and CT angiography compared with capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  B He; S Gong; C Hu; J Fan; J Qian; S Huang; L Cui; Y Ji
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  [Imaging of gastrointestinal inflammation : Characteristic patterns and signs].

Authors:  T Mang; M Scharitzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.