Literature DB >> 28295413

Using a handheld stereo depth camera to overcome limited field-of-view in simulation imaging for radiation therapy treatment planning.

Cesare Jenkins1,2, Lei Xing1, Amy Yu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A correct body contour is essential for reliable treatment planning in radiation therapy. While modern medical imaging technologies provide highly accurate patient modeling, there are times when a patient's anatomy cannot be fully captured or there is a lack of easy access to computed tomography (CT) simulation. Here, we provide a practical solution to the surface contour truncation problem by using a handheld stereo depth camera (HSDC) to obtain the missing surface anatomy and a surface-surface image registration to stich the surface data into the CT dataset for treatment planning.
METHODS: For a subject with truncated simulation CT images, a HSDC is used to capture the surface information of the truncated anatomy. A mesh surface model is created using a software tool provided by the camera manufacturer. A surface-to-surface registration technique is used to merge the mesh model with the CT and fill in the missing surface information thereby obtaining a complete surface model of the subject. To evaluate the accuracy of the proposed approach, experiments were performed with the following steps. First, we selected three previously treated patients and fabricated a phantom mimicking each patient using the corresponding CT images and a 3D printer. Second, we removed part of the CT images of each patient to create hypothetical cases with image truncations. Next, a HSDC was used to image the 3D-printed phantoms and the HSDC-derived surface models were registered with the hypothetically truncated CT images. The contours obtained using the approach were then compared with the ground truth contours derived from the original simulation CT without image truncation. The distance between the two contours was calculated in order to evaluate the accuracy of the method. Finally, the dosimetric impact of the approach is assessed by comparing the volume within the 95% isodose line and global maximum dose (Dmax ) computed based on the two surface contours for the breast case that exhibited the largest contour variation in the treated breast.
RESULTS: A systematic strategy of using a 3D HSDC to compensate for missing surface information caused by the truncation of CT images was established. Our study showed that the proposed technique was able to reliably provide the full contours for treatment planning in the case of severe CT image truncation(s). The root-mean-square error for the registration between the aligned HDSC surface model and the ground truth data was found to be 2.1 mm. The average distance between the two models was 0.4 ± 1.7 mm (mean ± SD). Maximum deviations occurred in areas of high concavity or when the skin was close to the couch. The breast tissue covered by 95% isodose line decreased by 3% and Dmax increased by 0.2% with the use of the HSDC model.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of HSDC for obtaining missing surface data during simulation has a number of advantages, such as, ease of use, low cost, and no additional ionizing radiation. It may provide a clinically practical solution to deal with the longstanding problem of CT image truncations in radiation therapy treatment planning.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT simulation; camera; extended field-of-view; obese; treatment planning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28295413      PMCID: PMC5462446          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

Review 1.  CT simulation for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  E G A Aird; J Conway
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Dosimetric comparison of manual and beam angle optimization of gantry angles in IMRT.

Authors:  Shiv P Srivastava; Indra J Das; Arvind Kumar; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 1.482

3.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  A novel reconstruction algorithm to extend the CT scan field-of-view.

Authors:  J Hsieh; E Chao; J Thibault; B Grekowicz; A Horst; S McOlash; T J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Extension of the reconstruction field of view and truncation correction using sinogram decomposition.

Authors:  Alexander A Zamyatin; Satoru Nakanishi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The use of computed tomography data for radiotherapy dose calculations.

Authors:  P K Kijewski; B E Bjärngard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions.

Authors:  Joakim H Jonsson; Magnus G Karlsson; Mikael Karlsson; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Dosimetric impact of image artifact from a wide-bore CT scanner in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Vincent Wu; Matthew B Podgorsak; Tuan-Anh Tran; Harish K Malhotra; Iris Z Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Accuracy of surface registration compared to conventional volumetric registration in patient positioning for head-and-neck radiotherapy: a simulation study using patient data.

Authors:  Youngjun Kim; Ruijiang Li; Yong Hum Na; Rena Lee; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  A line-profile based double partial fusion method for acquiring planning CT of oversized patients in radiation treatment.

Authors:  Huanmei Wu; Qingya Zhao; Minsong Cao; Indra Das
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  A modern mold room: Meshing 3D surface scanning, digital design, and 3D printing with bolus fabrication.

Authors:  David Kiyoshi Sasaki; Philip McGeachy; Jorge E Alpuche Aviles; Boyd McCurdy; Rashmi Koul; Arbind Dubey
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  CT-less electron radiotherapy simulation and planning with a consumer 3D camera.

Authors:  Lawrie Skinner; Rick Knopp; Yi-Chun Wang; Piotr Dubrowski; Karl K Bush; Alyssa Limmer; Nicholas Trakul; Lynn Million; Carol M Marquez; Amy S Yu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.