Literature DB >> 15738505

Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings.

Michael Barkham1, Naomi Gilbert, Janice Connell, Chris Marshall, Elspeth Twigg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for reliable assessment tools that are suitable for the counselling and the psychological therapy services in primary and secondary care settings. AIMS: To test the suitability and utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) and CORE-Assessment (CORE-A) assessment tools.
METHOD: Service intake data were analysed from counselling and psychological therapy services in 32 primary care settings and 17 secondary care settings.
RESULTS: Completion rates exceeded 98% in both of the settings sampled. Intake severity levels were similar but secondary care patients were more likely to score above the risk cut-off and the severe threshold and to have experienced their problems for a greater duration.
CONCLUSIONS: The CORE-OM and CORE-A are suitable assessment tools that show small but logical differences between psychological therapy services in primary- and secondary-based care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15738505     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.186.3.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  9 in total

1.  Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM).

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; John E Brazier; Tracey A Young; Michael Barkham
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Performance of the CORE-10 and YP-CORE measures in a sample of youth engaging with a community mental health service.

Authors:  Aileen O'Reilly; Nicholas Peiper; Lynsey O'Keeffe; Robert Illback; Richard Clayton
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  The Challenges of Using Self-Report Measures with People with Severe Mental Illness: Four Participants' Experiences of the Research Process.

Authors:  Jennifer Bibb; Katrina Skewes McFerran
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-03-14

4.  A national evaluation of the Irish public health counselling in primary care service- examination of initial effectiveness data.

Authors:  Charles Brand; Fiona Ward; Niamh MacDonagh; Sharon Cunningham; Ladislav Timulak
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.144

5.  Measurement properties of the Swedish clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measures (CORE-OM): Rasch analysis and short version for depressed and anxious out-patients in a multicultural area.

Authors:  Louise Danielsson; Magnus L Elfström; Javier Galan Henche; Jeanette Melin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  Measuring functional outcomes in major trauma: can we do better?

Authors:  Paul Andrzejowski; Patricia Holch; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Estimating a preference-based index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mavranezouli; John E Brazier; Donna Rowen; Michael Barkham
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure.

Authors:  Adriana Trujillo; Guillem Feixas; Arturo Bados; Eugeni García-Grau; Marta Salla; Joan Carles Medina; Adrián Montesano; José Soriano; Leticia Medeiros-Ferreira; Josep Cañete; Sergi Corbella; Antoni Grau; Fernando Lana; Chris Evans
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mattias Victor; Bjørn Lau; Torleif Ruud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.