PURPOSE: Engaging patients, caregivers, and other health care stakeholders as partners in planning, conducting, and disseminating research is a promising way to improve clinical decision making and outcomes. Many researchers, patients, and other stakeholders, however, lack clarity about when and how to engage as partners within the clinical research process. To address the need for guidance on creating meaningful stakeholder partnerships in patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) developed the PCORI Engagement Rubric (Rubric). METHODS: PCORI developed the Rubric drawing from a synthesis of the literature, a qualitative study with patients, a targeted review of engagement plans from PCORI-funded project applications, and a moderated discussion and review with PCORI's Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement. RESULTS: The Rubric provides a framework for operationalizing engagement to incorporate patients and other stakeholders in all phases of research. It includes: principles of engagement; definitions of stakeholder types; key considerations for planning, conducting, and disseminating engaged research; potential engagement activities; and examples of promising practices from PCORI-funded projects. CONCLUSIONS: PCORI designed the Rubric to illustrate opportunities for engagement to researchers interested in applying for PCORI funding and to patients and other stakeholders interested in greater involvement in research. By encouraging PCORI applicants, awardees, and others to apply the rubric, PCORI hopes to shift the research paradigm from one of conducting research on patients as subjects to a pursuit carried out in collaboration with patients and other stakeholders to better reflect the values, preferences, and outcomes that matter to the patient community.
PURPOSE: Engaging patients, caregivers, and other health care stakeholders as partners in planning, conducting, and disseminating research is a promising way to improve clinical decision making and outcomes. Many researchers, patients, and other stakeholders, however, lack clarity about when and how to engage as partners within the clinical research process. To address the need for guidance on creating meaningful stakeholder partnerships in patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) developed the PCORI Engagement Rubric (Rubric). METHODS: PCORI developed the Rubric drawing from a synthesis of the literature, a qualitative study with patients, a targeted review of engagement plans from PCORI-funded project applications, and a moderated discussion and review with PCORI's Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement. RESULTS: The Rubric provides a framework for operationalizing engagement to incorporate patients and other stakeholders in all phases of research. It includes: principles of engagement; definitions of stakeholder types; key considerations for planning, conducting, and disseminating engaged research; potential engagement activities; and examples of promising practices from PCORI-funded projects. CONCLUSIONS: PCORI designed the Rubric to illustrate opportunities for engagement to researchers interested in applying for PCORI funding and to patients and other stakeholders interested in greater involvement in research. By encouraging PCORI applicants, awardees, and others to apply the rubric, PCORI hopes to shift the research paradigm from one of conducting research on patients as subjects to a pursuit carried out in collaboration with patients and other stakeholders to better reflect the values, preferences, and outcomes that matter to the patient community.
Authors: Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman Journal: Health Expect Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Mohammed Nabhan; Nathan Shippee; Juan Pablo Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia Erwin; David Eton; Jeff Sloan; Victor Montori; Noor Asi; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Mohammad Hassan Murad Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Christina Nicolaidis; Dora Raymaker; Steven K Kapp; Amelia Baggs; E Ashkenazy; Katherine McDonald; Michael Weiner; Joelle Maslak; Morrigan Hunter; Andrea Joyce Journal: Autism Date: 2019-04-03
Authors: Yamilï Molina; Karriem S Watson; Liliana G San Miguel; Karen Aguirre; Mariana Hernandez-Flores; Tatiana B Giraldo; Araceli Lucio; Nora Coronado; Phoenix A Matthews Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Jennifer M Poger; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Cindy L Bryce; Jennifer K Carroll; Lan Kong; Erica B Francis; Jennifer L Kraschnewski Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2019-05-14
Authors: Patricia A Deverka; Rick Bangs; Karma Kreizenbeck; Deborah M Delaney; Dawn L Hershman; Charles D Blanke; Scott D Ramsey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: James D Harrison; Wendy G Anderson; Maureen Fagan; Edmondo Robinson; Jeffrey Schnipper; Gina Symczak; Catherine Hanson; Martha B Carnie; Jim Banta; Sherry Chen; Jonathan Duong; Celene Wong; Andrew D Auerbach Journal: Patient Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.883