| Literature DB >> 28288658 |
Sarah O S Osman1, Simon Horn2, Darren Brady2, Stephen J McMahon2, Ahamed B Mohamed Yoosuf3, Darren Mitchell4, Karen Crowther3, Ciara A Lyons2, Alan R Hounsell2,3, Kevin M Prise2, Conor K McGarry2,3, Suneil Jain2,4, Joe M O'Sullivan2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Low-dose-rate permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) is an attractive treatment option for patients with localised prostate cancer with excellent outcomes. As standard CT-based post-implant dosimetry often correlates poorly with late treatment-related toxicity, this exploratory (proof of concept) study was conducted to investigate correlations between radiation - induced DNA damage biomarker levels, and acute and late bowel, urinary, and sexual toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: DNA damage biomarkers (γH2AX and 53BP1); EPIC; Permanent prostate brachytherapy; Sector analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28288658 PMCID: PMC5348795 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0792-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Patient basic baseline characteristics
| Patient # | Age at diagnosis | PSA (ng/mL) | Gleason (primary + secondary) | Risk group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | 9.2 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
| 2 | 58 | 9.7 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
| 3 | 60 | 10.9 | 3 + 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 55 | 8.6 | 4 + 3 | 2 |
| 5 | 55 | 9.2 | 3 + 3 | 1 |
| 6 | 51 | 8.7 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
| 7 | 54 | 6.7 | 4 + 3 | 2 |
| 8 | 74 | 7.4 | 4 + 3 | 2 |
| 9 | 57 | 7.7 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
| 10 | 65 | 14.5 | 4 + 3 | 2 |
| 11 | 53 | 3.9 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
| 12 | 57 | 11.6 | 3 + 4 | 2 |
Risk group 1 = low risk, 2 = intermediate risk
Fig. 1Typical dose distribution following 125I prostate brachytherapy. The rectum, prostate and bladder have been contoured on a CT scan 4 weeks after brachytherapy and reconstructed in 3D. Brachytherapy seeds within the prostate are highlighted green and a colourwash representing total dose has been applied to the surface of each organ
Fig. 2a) Relative activity of 125I as a function of time post-seed-implantation. b) mean foci number per cell in patients' peripheralblood lymphocytes (the blue square on the vertical axis indicates mean background counts) and corrected for background (c). The error bars represent the standard error and the red dashed line represents the 125I half-life of 1426.3 h (59.43 days)
Fig. 3Foci distribution counts in patients’ peripheral blood lymphocytes pre- and post- seed implantation. The error bars represent the standard error
Fig. 4Changes in quality-of-life scores over time for each domain studied on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. EPIC scores range from 0 to 100, with higher values representing a more favorable health-related quality of life. In the figure median with inter-quartile range IQR (boxes), and ± 1.5*IQR (whiskers) are presented. Dots are different data points and red dots are outliers
Fig. 5Bowel-related cross-correlation matrix of Spearman’s correlation coefficients (ρ). Upper triangle; ρ values with insignificant correlation (p ≤ 0.05) marked with an X. Lower triangle; colour coded coefficients. S(x) = prostatic sector number ‘x’, Rec = rectum, D0.1cc and D2cc = the doses received by the hottest 0.1 cc and 2 cc of the volume, respectively. Foci base = γH2AX/53BP1 foci count at baseline (pre-implant (t = 0 h)). Foci R t = ratio of foci count at time point t relative to baseline (0 h). EPIC(x) = change in EPIC score from baseline; positive values reflecting improvement, negative values deterioration and 0 no change. * For space consideration all ρ values are presented as percentages
Fig. 6Bladder-related cross-correlation matrix of Spearman’s correlation coefficients. (ρ). Upper triangle; ρ values with insignificant correlation (p ≤ 0.05) marked with an X. Lower triangle; colour coded coefficients. S(x) = prostatic sector number ‘x’, Bla = bladder, D0.1cc and D2cc = the doses received by the hottest 0.1 cc and 2 cc of the volume, respectively. Foci base = γH2AX/53BP1 foci count at baseline (pre-treatment (t = 0 h)). Foci R t = ratio of foci count at time point t relative to baseline (0 h). EPIC (x) = change in EPIC score from baseline; positive values reflecting improvement, negative values deterioration and 0 no change. * For space consideration all ρ values are presented as percentages
Fig. 7Sexual symptoms-related cross-correlation matrix of Spearman’s correlation coefficients (ρ). Upper triangle; ρ values with insignificant correlation (p ≤ 0.05) marked with an X. Lower triangle; colour coded coefficients. S (x) = prostatic sector number ‘x’. Foci base = γH2AX/53BP1 foci count at baseline (pre-treatment (t = 0 h)). Foci R t = ratio of foci count at time point t relative to baseline (0 h). EPIC (x) = change in EPIC score from baseline; positive values reflecting improvement, negative values deterioration and 0 no change. * For space consideration all ρ values are presented as percentages