Literature DB >> 28283757

Concept of patient-specific shape memory implants for the treatment of orbital floor fractures.

Ronny Grunert1,2, Maximilian Wagner3,4, Christian Rotsch5, Harald Essig4, Susanna Posern6, Friedemann Pabst6, Welf-Guntram Drossel5, Juergen Lichtenstein3,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We will aim to develop implants made of a Ni-Ti shape memory alloy which can be applied for the treatment of midface fractures, such as isolated orbital floor fractures. These can then be implanted in a compressed form and unfold automatically in the body. With the help of newly developed application instruments, the implants can be applied along transnasal and transantral approaches into the maxillary sinus. Our objective is to evaluate the operation process and the functionality of these implants, already in a pre-investigation by an experienced surgeon on a phantom.
METHODS: The functionality of the surgical procedure and an implant prototype were both evaluated with the help of a realistic phantom. The minimally invasive application was carried out using the transnasal and transantral approach. Instruments and implant were rated individually on a scale, from -2 (not at all) to +2 (very good) for vaious criteria, such as the implants functionality or the ergonomics of the entire procedure. For a geometric comparison between the manufactured implant and the planned target geometry, the implants were scanned by micro-computed tomography. CAD models were derived from the scans by using reverse engineering.
RESULTS: Both the implants and the application procedure were assessed as good; thus, the implant concept is suitable for further development.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants made of shape memory alloys could allow in the future and allow less invasive access to treat orbital floor fractures. The implant design has to be modified that the implant can be stabilized and fixed with screws or a suture to avoid dislocation or implant loosening. The complication rates and risks of conventional orbital reconstructions should be lowered by this new method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implants; NiTi; Orbital floor fractures; Orbital reconstruction; Shape memory alloys

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28283757     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-017-0615-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  9 in total

1.  Open reduction versus endoscopically controlled reconstruction of orbital floor fractures: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  A C Hundepool; M A P Willemsen; M J Koudstaal; K G H van der Wal
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Surgical approaches to the infraorbital rim and orbital floor: the case for the transconjunctival approach.

Authors:  George M Kushner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  Biomaterials and implants for orbital floor repair.

Authors:  Francesco Baino
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Use of the preseptal transconjunctival approach in orbit reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  A Baumann; R Ewers
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Benefits of stereolithography in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  D E Holck; E M Boyd; J Ng; R O Mauffray
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Cytotoxic, allergic and genotoxic activity of a nickel-titanium alloy.

Authors:  D J Wever; A G Veldhuizen; M M Sanders; J M Schakenraad; J R van Horn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Retrospective analysis of 301 patients with orbital floor fracture.

Authors:  Davina Bartoli; Maria Teresa Fadda; Andrea Battisti; Andrea Cassoni; Mario Pagnoni; Emiliano Riccardi; Marcello Sanzi; Valentino Valentini
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures.

Authors:  Thomas Gander; Harald Essig; Philipp Metzler; Daniel Lindhorst; Leander Dubois; Martin Rücker; Paul Schumann
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Subciliary versus swinging eyelid approach to the orbital floor.

Authors:  Giacomo De Riu; Silvio Mario Meloni; Roberta Gobbi; Damiano Soma; Alessandro Baj; Antonio Tullio
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.078

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Functionalization of screw implants with superelastic structured Nitinol anchoring elements.

Authors:  Isabell Hamann; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Christian Rotsch; Welf-Guntram Drossel; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Mario Leimert
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.