Literature DB >> 11243611

Use of the preseptal transconjunctival approach in orbit reconstruction surgery.

A Baumann1, R Ewers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This report evaluated the advantages of the preseptal transconjunctival approach in reconstruction of the orbit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-nine preseptal incisions were used in 80 patients for different indications (blowout fracture, complex zygoma fracture, enophthalmos correction, midface hypoplasia, secondary incision). All operative procedures were performed without an additional lateral canthotomy. The infraorbital rim was stabilized with miniplates or microplates.
RESULTS: There was no ectropion or entropion in any patients. Complications included 1 laceration of the tarsal plate and 1 temporary entropion after a primary subciliary incision. The overall complication rate was 2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The preseptal transconjunctival incision without lateral canthotomy provides good exposure of the orbital floor and the caudal parts of the lateral and medial wall. This approach is preferable to a retroseptal approach in reconstructive orbital surgery because of minimal disturbance of the intraorbital connective tissue framework. The anatomic optimal dissection line also results in a lower complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11243611     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.20997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  16 in total

1.  Transconjunctival preseptal approach for orbital floor and infraorbital rim fracture.

Authors:  B S Santosh; Girish Giraddi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-26

2.  'Y' Modification of the Transconjunctival Approach for Management of Zygomatic Complex Fractures: A Prospective Analysis.

Authors:  K Rajkumar; P Mukhopadhyay; Ramen Sinha; T K Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-04

3.  Lower Eyelid Malposition Following Orbital Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 198 Surgeries.

Authors:  Alexandra G Kesselring; Paul Promes; Elske M Strabbing; Karel G H van der Wal; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-03

Review 4.  Orbital Trauma.

Authors:  Kirkland N Lozada; Patrick W Cleveland; Jesse E Smith
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Clinical effect of a mixed solution of sodium hyaluronate and sodium carboxymethylcellulose during the transconjunctival approach for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Byung Wan Kang; Hyo Seok Lee; Han Jin Oh; Kyung Chul Yoon
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2012-08-24

6.  Efficacy of Iliac Crest vs. Medpor in Orbital Floor Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hari Ram; R K Singh; Shadab Mohammad; Anup Kumar Gupta
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-09-23

7.  Functional outcome after surgical treatment of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Paul W Poeschl; Arnulf Baumann; Guido Dorner; Guenter Russmueller; Rudolf Seemann; Ferenc Fabian; Rolf Ewers
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Optimizing the surgical management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.

Authors:  Edward I Lee; Kriti Mohan; John C Koshy; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.314

9.  Concept of patient-specific shape memory implants for the treatment of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Ronny Grunert; Maximilian Wagner; Christian Rotsch; Harald Essig; Susanna Posern; Friedemann Pabst; Welf-Guntram Drossel; Juergen Lichtenstein
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-10

10.  Long-term follow-up of blowout fractures of the orbital floor reconstructed with a polyglactin 910/PDS implant.

Authors:  F Blake; M Blessmann; R Smeets; R Friedrich; R Schmelzle; M Heiland; W Eichhorn
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.