Suzann Pershing1, Nidhi Talwar2, Stephen T Armenti3, Joseph Grubbs3, Julie M Rosenthal3, Vaidehi S Dedania3, Joshua D Stein4. 1. Byers Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Center for Eye Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Electronic address: jdstein@med.umich.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether publication of Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT) results and introduction of aflibercept to the marketplace affected intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns. METHODS: We calculated weekly bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization during 3 timeframes: (1) before CATT publication, (2) between CATT publication (April 28, 2011) and assignment of a unique aflibercept billing code (January 1, 2013), and (3) afterward for 164,188 Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular macular degeneration receiving ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (≥80%) administered bevacizumab or ranibizumab and evaluated changes in preferences over the 3 periods. We replicated analyses on 881,381 commercially insured beneficiaries. RESULTS: Among 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab to Medicare beneficiaries pre-CATT, 221 (69.7%) reduced ranibizumab use post-CATT, whereas 96 (30.3%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time. Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-CATT-777 (74.6%) continued bevacizumab-predominant use while 264 (25.4%) reduced bevacizumab use post-CATT. Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizumab before aflibercept's availability, 77 (53.1%) reduced ranibizumab utilization and 68 (46.9%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time after aflibercept became available. Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-aflibercept were 381 (41.9%) reducing and 528 (58.1%) continuing bevacizumab-predominant use. Similar results were observed for commercially insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumab after CATT publication, while most who favored bevacizumab before CATT publication continued favoring it afterward. Aflibercept's introduction had little impact on preferences for ranibizumab or bevacizumab.
PURPOSE: To assess whether publication of Comparison of Age-related macular degeneration Treatment Trial (CATT) results and introduction of aflibercept to the marketplace affected intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns. METHODS: We calculated weekly bevacizumab and ranibizumab utilization during 3 timeframes: (1) before CATT publication, (2) between CATT publication (April 28, 2011) and assignment of a unique aflibercept billing code (January 1, 2013), and (3) afterward for 164,188 Medicare beneficiaries with neovascular macular degeneration receiving ≥1 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection(s) from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. We identified ophthalmologists who predominantly (≥80%) administered bevacizumab or ranibizumab and evaluated changes in preferences over the 3 periods. We replicated analyses on 881,381 commercially insured beneficiaries. RESULTS: Among 317 ophthalmologists administering predominantly ranibizumab to Medicare beneficiaries pre-CATT, 221 (69.7%) reduced ranibizumab use post-CATT, whereas 96 (30.3%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time. Findings were reversed among 1041 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-CATT-777 (74.6%) continued bevacizumab-predominant use while 264 (25.4%) reduced bevacizumab use post-CATT. Among the 145 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered ranibizumab before aflibercept's availability, 77 (53.1%) reduced ranibizumab utilization and 68 (46.9%) continued using ranibizumab ≥80% of the time after aflibercept became available. Corresponding numbers among the 909 ophthalmologists who predominantly administered bevacizumab pre-aflibercept were 381 (41.9%) reducing and 528 (58.1%) continuing bevacizumab-predominant use. Similar results were observed for commercially insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Many ophthalmologists who favored ranibizumab switched to bevacizumab after CATT publication, while most who favored bevacizumab before CATT publication continued favoring it afterward. Aflibercept's introduction had little impact on preferences for ranibizumab or bevacizumab.
Authors: Ravi Parikh; Joseph S Ross; Lindsey R Sangaralingham; Ron A Adelman; Nilay D Shah; Andrew J Barkmeier Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Daniel F Martin; Maureen G Maguire; Stuart L Fine; Gui-shuang Ying; Glenn J Jaffe; Juan E Grunwald; Cynthia Toth; Maryann Redford; Frederick L Ferris Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jeffrey J Goldberger; Robert O Bonow; Michael Cuffe; Alan Dyer; Yves Rosenberg; Robert O'Rourke; Prediman K Shah; Sidney C Smith Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Emily W Gower; Joshua D Stein; Nakul S Shekhawat; Shravani Mikkilineni; Taylor S Blachley; Nicholas M Pajewski Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Laura S Edison; Hope O Dishman; Melissa J Tobin-D'Angelo; C Richard Allen; Alice Y Guh; Cherie L Drenzek Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.883