Literature DB >> 28281203

Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling.

David A Katzka1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The costs to society and accuracy of screening for esophageal cancer and other esophageal diseases with standard endoscopy are formidable. As a result, the applicability of endoscopy as a general screening tool has been challenged. RECENT
FINDINGS: To maintain accuracy but reduce the price of endoscopy on society, multiple adjunct or replacement technologies are being developed that are less expensive and more easily applied. These devices include image-enhancing techniques that more reliably identify dysplasia and cancer reducing the need for extensive biopsy sampling during standard endoscopy. They also include ambulatory forms for procuring esophageal imaging including smaller endoscopes and capsule endoscopy. Finally, some of the newer methods either obtain samples of esophageal tissue through bedside maneuvers not requiring endoscopy or retrieve information about mucosal inflammation and function without the need to procure esophageal tissue. There is an exciting future for esophageal diagnosis with tools that will save cost and/or provide greater accuracy and safety for some of the most common esophageal disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capsule; Cytology; Esophagus; Impedance; Sponge device; Transnasal endoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281203     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-017-0550-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  41 in total

1.  Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; S L Fett; A R Zinsmeister; L J Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Use of direct, endoscopic-guided measurements of mucosal impedance in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Elif Saritas Yuksel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Jerry Mabary; Robert T Kavitt; C Gaelyn Garrett; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Routine endoscopic screening for synchronous esophageal neoplasm in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study.

Authors:  E J Gong; D H Kim; J Y Ahn; K-S Choi; K W Jung; J H Lee; K D Choi; H J Song; G H Lee; H-Y Jung; J H Kim; J-L Roh; S-H Choi; S Y Nam; S Y Kim
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Esophageal capsule endoscopy for evaluation of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: findings and its image quality.

Authors:  D Chavalitdhamrong; G C Chen; B E Roth; O Goltzer; J Sul; R Jutabha
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Mucosal impedance discriminates GERD from non-GERD conditions.

Authors:  Fehmi Ates; Elif Saritas Yuksel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Jerry Mabary; Robert T Kavitt; C Gaelyn Garrett; David Francis; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Endoscopic Mucosal Impedance Measurements Correlate With Eosinophilia and Dilation of Intercellular Spaces in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  David A Katzka; Karthik Ravi; Debra M Geno; Thomas C Smyrk; Prasad G Iyer; Jeffrey A Alexander; Jerry E Mabary; Michael Camilleri; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Image-enhanced endoscopy for detection of second primary neoplasm in patients with esophageal and head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen-Shuan Chung; Wu-Chia Lo; Yi-Chia Lee; Ming-Shiang Wu; Hsiu-Po Wang; Li-Jen Liao
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Tatiana Benaglia; Linda D Sharples; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Use of transnasal endoscopy for screening of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in high-risk patients: yield rate, completion rate, and safety.

Authors:  Chih-Hsien Wang; Yi-Chia Lee; Cheng-Ping Wang; Chien-Chuan Chen; Jenq-Yuh Ko; Ming-Lun Han; Tseng-Cheng Chen; Pei-Jen Lou; Tsung-Lin Yang; Tzu-Yu Hsiao; Ming-Shiang Wu; Hsiu-Po Wang; Ping-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  Cytologic detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions using balloon samplers and liquid-based cytology in asymptomatic adults in Llinxian, China.

Authors:  Qin-Jing Pan; Mark J Roth; Hui-Qin Guo; Michael L Kochman; Guo-Qing Wang; Michael Henry; Wen-Qiang Wei; Carol A Giffen; Ning Lu; Christian C Abnet; Chang-Qing Hao; Philip R Taylor; You-Lin Qiao; Sanford M Dawsey
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

View more
  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Testing for Barrett Esophagus.

Authors:  Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-02

2.  Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett's esophagus: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Donevan Westerveld; Vikas Khullar; Lazarus Mramba; Fares Ayoub; Tony Brar; Mitali Agarwal; Justin Forde; Joydeep Chakraborty; Michael Riverso; Yaseen B Perbtani; Anand Gupte; Chris E Forsmark; Peter Draganov; Dennis Yang
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  MicroRNA‑675‑3p promotes esophageal squamous cell cancer cell migration and invasion.

Authors:  Qi Xiao; Tianming Chen; Yao Wu; Wenxiu Wu; Yandi Xu; Zhunan Gong; Shilin Chen
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.952

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.