David A Katzka1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Ave., S.W., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Katzka.david@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The costs to society and accuracy of screening for esophageal cancer and other esophageal diseases with standard endoscopy are formidable. As a result, the applicability of endoscopy as a general screening tool has been challenged. RECENT FINDINGS: To maintain accuracy but reduce the price of endoscopy on society, multiple adjunct or replacement technologies are being developed that are less expensive and more easily applied. These devices include image-enhancing techniques that more reliably identify dysplasia and cancer reducing the need for extensive biopsy sampling during standard endoscopy. They also include ambulatory forms for procuring esophageal imaging including smaller endoscopes and capsule endoscopy. Finally, some of the newer methods either obtain samples of esophageal tissue through bedside maneuvers not requiring endoscopy or retrieve information about mucosal inflammation and function without the need to procure esophageal tissue. There is an exciting future for esophageal diagnosis with tools that will save cost and/or provide greater accuracy and safety for some of the most common esophageal disorders.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The costs to society and accuracy of screening for esophageal cancer and other esophageal diseases with standard endoscopy are formidable. As a result, the applicability of endoscopy as a general screening tool has been challenged. RECENT FINDINGS: To maintain accuracy but reduce the price of endoscopy on society, multiple adjunct or replacement technologies are being developed that are less expensive and more easily applied. These devices include image-enhancing techniques that more reliably identify dysplasia and cancer reducing the need for extensive biopsy sampling during standard endoscopy. They also include ambulatory forms for procuring esophageal imaging including smaller endoscopes and capsule endoscopy. Finally, some of the newer methods either obtain samples of esophageal tissue through bedside maneuvers not requiring endoscopy or retrieve information about mucosal inflammation and function without the need to procure esophageal tissue. There is an exciting future for esophageal diagnosis with tools that will save cost and/or provide greater accuracy and safety for some of the most common esophageal disorders.
Authors: Elif Saritas Yuksel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Jerry Mabary; Robert T Kavitt; C Gaelyn Garrett; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-05-27 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: E J Gong; D H Kim; J Y Ahn; K-S Choi; K W Jung; J H Lee; K D Choi; H J Song; G H Lee; H-Y Jung; J H Kim; J-L Roh; S-H Choi; S Y Nam; S Y Kim Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Fehmi Ates; Elif Saritas Yuksel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Jerry Mabary; Robert T Kavitt; C Gaelyn Garrett; David Francis; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: David A Katzka; Karthik Ravi; Debra M Geno; Thomas C Smyrk; Prasad G Iyer; Jeffrey A Alexander; Jerry E Mabary; Michael Camilleri; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Qin-Jing Pan; Mark J Roth; Hui-Qin Guo; Michael L Kochman; Guo-Qing Wang; Michael Henry; Wen-Qiang Wei; Carol A Giffen; Ning Lu; Christian C Abnet; Chang-Qing Hao; Philip R Taylor; You-Lin Qiao; Sanford M Dawsey Journal: Acta Cytol Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.319
Authors: Donevan Westerveld; Vikas Khullar; Lazarus Mramba; Fares Ayoub; Tony Brar; Mitali Agarwal; Justin Forde; Joydeep Chakraborty; Michael Riverso; Yaseen B Perbtani; Anand Gupte; Chris E Forsmark; Peter Draganov; Dennis Yang Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2018-03-01