Literature DB >> 28280625

Defining the distal margin of rectal cancer for surgical planning.

Sumito Sato1, Takashi Kato1, Jun-Ichi Tanaka1.   

Abstract

Accurate measurement of the distal rectal tumor margin is essential in selecting the appropriate surgical procedure. However, there is no standard measurement method. The National Cancer Institute consensus group recommends use of the anal verge (AV) as a landmark, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology recommends use of the anorectal ring (ARR). In addition, whether measurements should be made on double contrast barium enema (BE) radiographs or magnetic resonance (MR) images remains controversial. We measured the distal tumor margin on both BE and MR images obtained preoperatively from 52 patients who underwent sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. The distances from the distal end of the tumor to the AV and the ARR were measured on both types of images, and the variability was investigated by Bland-Altman analysis. The mean distance from the tumor to the AV was 8.9 cm on the BE radiographs and 7.7 cm on the MR images (P=0.013). The mean distances to the ARR were 6.8 and 5.6 cm, respectively (P=0.070). Significant proportional bias was shown as the measured distances increased, the difference between the BE- and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurements increased. Use of one or the other landmark did not affect selection of the appropriate surgical procedure. We conclude that an approximate 1-cm underestimation should be taken into account when MRI-based measurement of the distal rectal tumor margin is used to choose between sphincter-saving resection and abdominoperineal resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-contrast barium enema; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); rectal cancer; sphincter-preserving surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280625      PMCID: PMC5334053          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  9 in total

Review 1.  Treatment strategy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit.

Authors:  P Videhult; K Smedh; P Lundin; W Kraaz
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Techniques in total mesorectal excision surgery.

Authors:  Warren E Lichliter
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-03

4.  Pre-operative assessment of extramural invasion and sphincteral involvement in rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with phased-array coil.

Authors:  M Ferri; A Laghi; P Mingazzini; F Iafrate; L Meli; F Ricci; R Passariello; V Ziparo
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the clinical management of rectal cancer patients: recommendations from the 2012 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Shandra Bipat; Brunella Barbaro; Filipe Caseiro-Alves; Luís Curvo-Semedo; Helen M Fenlon; Marc J Gollub; Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Steve Halligan; Christine Hoeffel; Seung Ho Kim; Andrea Laghi; Andrea Maier; Søren R Rafaelsen; Jaap Stoker; Stuart A Taylor; Michael R Torkzad; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G Brown; A G Radcliffe; R G Newcombe; N S Dallimore; M W Bourne; G T Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Barium enema and CT volumetry for predicting pathologic response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Koji Murono; Kazushige Kawai; Nelson H Tsuno; Soichiro Ishihara; Hironori Yamaguchi; Eiji Sunami; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  MRI-defined height of rectal tumours.

Authors:  D S Keller; R Paspulati; A Kjellmo; K M Rokseth; B Bankwitz; A Wibe; C P Delaney
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Rectal cancer: the sphincter-sparing approach.

Authors:  David M Ota; Lisa Jacobs; Boris Kuvshinoff
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and validation of an MRI-based radiomic nomogram to distinguish between good and poor responders in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Xuejun Liu; Bin Hu; Yuanxiang Gao; Jingjing Chen; Jie Li
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-05

2.  Optimized Parameters of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Prediction of the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jie Li; Jia Wang; Jing Pang; Shougen Cao; Jingjing Chen; Wenjian Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.