Literature DB >> 24307598

MRI-defined height of rectal tumours.

D S Keller1, R Paspulati, A Kjellmo, K M Rokseth, B Bankwitz, A Wibe, C P Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no standard for reporting rectal cancer distances from the distal resection margin in the literature. The objective was to demonstrate the importance of rectal cancer measurement from a standardized point.
METHODS: Review of databases at two international institutions identified 50 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma within 15 cm of the anal verge (AV), who had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and underwent surgery with curative intent. Expert radiologists reviewed the magnetic resonance images for anatomical distances from the anorectal ring (ARR) to the AV, from the ARR to the dentate line (DL), and from the DL to the AV. Anatomical measurements were compared with preoperative measurements to assess reporting inconsistencies.
RESULTS: Fifty patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the study. The mean(s.d.) anatomical distance was 1.66(0.61) cm from the ARR to the DL, 3.78(0.61) cm from the ARR to the AV (maximum 5.5 cm) and 2.11(0.10) cm from the DL to the AV. The mean radiological distance from the distal tumour was 2.90(1.60) (median 3.2, range 0-7.5) cm to the ARR, 4.36(3.20) (median 4.2, range -0.5 to 12.8) cm to the DL and 6.13(3.39) (median 6.0, range 0-14.1) cm to the AV. There was a significant difference in the distal tumour margin between measurements made by the expert radiologists and reported preoperative measurements (P < 0.001). Significant differences were also found between the expert radiologists' MRI and rigid proctoscopic measurements (P = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: There was up to 5.5 cm variation, depending on which landmark was chosen for reporting the distal margin of rectal cancer. This has potential implications for surgical planning, interpreting radiological images and comparative studies.
© 2013 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24307598     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  13 in total

1.  The influence of endorectal filling on rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Authors:  Rutger Ch Stijns; Tom Wj Scheenen; Johannes Hw de Wilt; Jurgen J Fütterer; Regina Gh Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  F Al-Rashid; S Robitaille; A S Liberman; P Charlebois; B Stein; L S Feldman; J F Fiore; L Lee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Measuring Rectal Cancer Tumor Height: Concordance Between Clinical Examination and MRI.

Authors:  Shannon M Navarro; Shuai Chen; Linda M Farkas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Defining the distal margin of rectal cancer for surgical planning.

Authors:  Sumito Sato; Takashi Kato; Jun-Ichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

5.  How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers.

Authors:  Yeo Eun Han; Beom Jin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Min Ju Kim; Na Yeon Han; Ki Choon Sim; Sung Bum Cho; Jin Kim; Seon-Hahn Kim; Hyonggin An
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-20

6.  The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.

Authors:  Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Measurement of rectal tumor height from the anal verge on MRI: a comparison of internal versus external anal sphincter.

Authors:  David D B Bates; James L Fuqua; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; Sidra Javed-Tayyab; Viktoriya Paroder; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-17

Review 8.  Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  C L Deijen; A Tsai; T W A Koedam; M Veltcamp Helbach; C Sietses; A M Lacy; H J Bonjer; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Comparison of MRI and colonoscopy in determining tumor height in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Lotte Jacobs; David B Meek; Joost van Heukelom; Thomas L Bollen; Peter D Siersema; Anke B Smits; Ellen Tromp; Maartje Los; Bas Lam Weusten; Niels van Lelyveld
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  Recognition of Anterior Peritoneal Reflections and Their Relationship With Rectal Tumors Using Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Sun Yiqun; Tong Tong; Liu Fangqi; Cai Sanjun; Xin Chao; Gu Yajia; Xu Ye
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.