Literature DB >> 28279877

A model-based analysis of decision making under risk in obsessive-compulsive and hoarding disorders.

Gabriel J Aranovich1, Daniel R Cavagnaro2, Mark A Pitt3, Jay I Myung3, Carol A Mathews4.   

Abstract

Attitudes towards risk are highly consequential in clinical disorders thought to be prone to "risky behavior", such as substance dependence, as well as those commonly associated with excessive risk aversion, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and hoarding disorder (HD). Moreover, it has recently been suggested that attitudes towards risk may serve as a behavioral biomarker for OCD. We investigated the risk preferences of participants with OCD and HD using a novel adaptive task and a quantitative model from behavioral economics that decomposes risk preferences into outcome sensitivity and probability sensitivity. Contrary to expectation, compared to healthy controls, participants with OCD and HD exhibited less outcome sensitivity, implying less risk aversion in the standard economic framework. In addition, risk attitudes were strongly correlated with depression, hoarding, and compulsion scores, while compulsion (hoarding) scores were associated with more (less) "rational" risk preferences. These results demonstrate how fundamental attitudes towards risk relate to specific psychopathology and thereby contribute to our understanding of the cognitive manifestations of mental disorders. In addition, our findings indicate that the conclusion made in recent work that decision making under risk is unaltered in OCD is premature.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational psychiatry; Decision making; Hoarding disorder; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Risk aversion; Value-based decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28279877      PMCID: PMC5624515          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  34 in total

1.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

2.  Decision-making heterogeneity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: ventromedial prefrontal cortex function predicts different treatment outcomes.

Authors:  P Cavedini; G Riboldi; A D'Annucci; P Belotti; M Cisima; L Bellodi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Adaptive design optimization: a mutual information-based approach to model discrimination in cognitive science.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt; Janne V Kujala
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.

Authors:  A T Beck; N Epstein; G Brown; R A Steer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-12

5.  Categorization and cognitive deficits in compulsive hoarding.

Authors:  Jessica R Grisham; Melissa M Norberg; Alishia D Williams; Sarah P Certoma; Raja Kadib
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2010-05-20

6.  Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Reid D Landes; Paul F Hill; Carole Baxter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Cognitive models of risky choice: parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory.

Authors:  Andreas Glöckner; Thorsten Pachur
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-01-09

8.  Decision-making under uncertainty in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Helen Pushkarskaya; David Tolin; Lital Ruderman; Ariel Kirshenbaum; J MacLaren Kelly; Christopher Pittenger; Ifat Levy
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.791

9.  Neuropsychological impairment associated with compulsive hoarding.

Authors:  Jessica R Grisham; Timothy A Brown; Cary R Savage; Gail Steketee; David H Barlow
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2007-01-12

10.  Trait-related decision making impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from decision making under ambiguity but not decision making under risk.

Authors:  Long Zhang; Yi Dong; Yifu Ji; Rui Tao; Xuequan Chen; Jianguo Ye; Lei Zhang; Fengqiong Yu; Chunyan Zhu; Kai Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  A model-based test for treatment effects with probabilistic classifications.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Clintin P Davis-Stober
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2018-05-21

2.  Value-based decision making under uncertainty in hoarding and obsessive- compulsive disorders.

Authors:  Helen Pushkarskaya; David Tolin; Lital Ruderman; Daniel Henick; J MacLaren Kelly; Christopher Pittenger; Ifat Levy
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  ADOpy: a python package for adaptive design optimization.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Yang; Mark A Pitt; Woo-Young Ahn; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

4.  Principles of Economic Rationality in Mice.

Authors:  Marion Rivalan; York Winter; Vladislav Nachev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Risking Everything in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Analogue Decision-Making Study.

Authors:  James Croft; Jessica R Grisham; Andrew Perfors; Brett K Hayes
Journal:  J Psychopathol Behav Assess       Date:  2021-11-22

6.  The effect of positive autobiographical memory retrieval on decision-making under risk: A computational model-based analysis.

Authors:  Natsumi Shimizu; Yasuhiro Mochizuki; Chong Chen; Kosuke Hagiwara; Karin Matsumoto; Yusuke Oda; Masako Hirotsu; Emi Okabe; Toshio Matsubara; Shin Nakagawa
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.435

7.  Increased Loss Aversion in Unmedicated Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Kamila E Sip; Richard Gonzalez; Stephan F Taylor; Emily R Stern
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Hairong Gu; Yitong Shen; Nathaniel Haines; Hunter A Hahn; Julie E Teater; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.