Literature DB >> 24088971

Cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff repair: an anatomic measure of outcome.

Chris Hyunchul Jo1, Ji Sun Shin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The change in the cross-sectional area of a repaired muscle, measured with use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), could be an indicator of recovery of muscle function. The aims of this study were to evaluate the change in the area of the supraspinatus muscle between the immediately postoperative and one-year postoperative MRIs and to identify factors associated with the change.
METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear were included. MRI was performed three days and one year after surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether the area of the supraspinatus increased or decreased between these two time points. Outcomes including pain, shoulder motion, strength, and commonly used clinical scores were assessed preoperatively and at three, six, and twelve months after surgery. Changes in the rotator cuff muscles and retear of the repaired tendon were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The area of the supraspinatus muscle increased in twenty-nine (33%) of the patients and decreased in fifty-nine (67%). The change in area was 36.75 ± 27.94 mm² in the group in which it increased and -94.25 ± 70.38 mm² in the group in which it decreased (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that a lower preoperative Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, better gross visual grade of the tendon at surgery, and greater strength of the supraspinatus at six months postoperatively were associated with an increase in the area. No retear or Sugaya grade of 3 was found in any patient in whom the area increased, whereas 34% of the patients in whom the area decreased had a retear (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle could either increase or decrease during the first year after rotator cuff repair and that robust healing (indicated by a Sugaya grade of 1 or 2) and good tendon quality at surgery were important factors associated with an increase in the area. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24088971     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Ultrasonic evaluation of the repair integrity can predict functional outcomes after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Elias Fotiadis; Renaud Barthelemy; Sophie Genna; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Changes of fatty infiltration according to the immediate postoperative time point in magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Ji Wan Park; Chris Hyunchul Jo; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique.

Authors:  F Pfalzer; J Huth; E Stürmer; D Endele; B Kniesel; F Mauch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Agreement in rotator cuff muscles measurement between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ueda; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yoshiki Takeuchi; Takashi Tachibana; Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara; Jun Umehara; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2022-03-31

7.  Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After Repair.

Authors:  Young Hoon Jang; Bo-Kyung Suh; Hyunseok Jeong; Oh Hyo Kwon; Sae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-23

8.  Quantitative Measurement of Muscle Atrophy and Fat Infiltration of the Supraspinatus Muscle Using Ultrasonography After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Yong Ki Kim; Eun Seok Choi; Keon Tae Kim; Jung Ro Yoon; Sang Han Chae
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-04-30

Review 9.  The effect of age on risk of retear after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael Khazzam; Brian Sager; Hayden N Box; Steven B Wallace
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-06-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.