Amir A Khan1, Siddhartha Sikdar2, Thomas Hatsukami3, Juan Cebral2, Michael Jones4, John Huston5, George Howard6, Brajesh K Lal7. 1. Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Va; Center for Vascular Diagnostics, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. 2. Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Va. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 4. Department of Cardiology, Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, Ky. 5. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 6. Department of Biostatistics, UAB School of Public Health, Birmingham, Ala. 7. Center for Vascular Diagnostics, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. Electronic address: blal@smail.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Current risk stratification of internal carotid artery plaques based on diameter-reducing percentage stenosis may be unreliable because ischemic stroke results from plaque disruption with atheroembolization. Biomechanical forces acting on the plaque may render it vulnerable to rupture. The feasibility of ultrasound-based quantification of plaque displacement and strain induced by hemodynamic forces and their relationship to high-risk plaques have not been determined. We studied the feasibility and reliability of carotid plaque strain measurement from clinical B-mode ultrasound images and the relationship of strain to high-risk plaque morphology. METHODS: We analyzed carotid ultrasound B-mode cine loops obtained in patients with asymptomatic ≥50% stenosis during routine clinical scanning. Optical flow methods were used to quantify plaque motion and shear strain during the cardiac cycle. The magnitude (maximum absolute shear strain rate [MASSR]) and variability (entropy of shear strain rate [ESSR] and variance of shear strain rate [VSSR]) of strain were combined into a composite shear strain index (SSI), which was assessed for interscan repeatability and correlated with plaque echolucency. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age, 70 years) constituting 36 plaques underwent imaging; 37% of patients (n = 7) showed high strain (SSI ≥0.5; MASSR, 2.2; ESSR, 39.7; VSSR, 0.03) in their plaques; the remaining clustered into a low-strain group (SSI <0.5; MASSR, 0.58; ESSR, 21.2; VSSR, 0.002). The area of echolucent morphology was greater in high-strain plaques vs low-strain plaques (28% vs 17%; P = .018). Strain measurements showed low variability on Bland-Altman plots with cluster assignment agreement of 76% on repeated scanning. Two patients developed a stroke during 2 years of follow-up; both demonstrated high SSI (≥0.5) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid plaque strain is reliably computed from routine B-mode imaging using clinical ultrasound machines. High plaque strain correlates with known high-risk echolucent morphology. Strain measurement can complement identification of patients at high risk for plaque disruption and stroke.
OBJECTIVE: Current risk stratification of internal carotid artery plaques based on diameter-reducing percentage stenosis may be unreliable because ischemic stroke results from plaque disruption with atheroembolization. Biomechanical forces acting on the plaque may render it vulnerable to rupture. The feasibility of ultrasound-based quantification of plaque displacement and strain induced by hemodynamic forces and their relationship to high-risk plaques have not been determined. We studied the feasibility and reliability of carotid plaque strain measurement from clinical B-mode ultrasound images and the relationship of strain to high-risk plaque morphology. METHODS: We analyzed carotid ultrasound B-mode cine loops obtained in patients with asymptomatic ≥50% stenosis during routine clinical scanning. Optical flow methods were used to quantify plaque motion and shear strain during the cardiac cycle. The magnitude (maximum absolute shear strain rate [MASSR]) and variability (entropy of shear strain rate [ESSR] and variance of shear strain rate [VSSR]) of strain were combined into a composite shear strain index (SSI), which was assessed for interscan repeatability and correlated with plaque echolucency. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age, 70 years) constituting 36 plaques underwent imaging; 37% of patients (n = 7) showed high strain (SSI ≥0.5; MASSR, 2.2; ESSR, 39.7; VSSR, 0.03) in their plaques; the remaining clustered into a low-strain group (SSI <0.5; MASSR, 0.58; ESSR, 21.2; VSSR, 0.002). The area of echolucent morphology was greater in high-strain plaques vs low-strain plaques (28% vs 17%; P = .018). Strain measurements showed low variability on Bland-Altman plots with cluster assignment agreement of 76% on repeated scanning. Two patients developed a stroke during 2 years of follow-up; both demonstrated high SSI (≥0.5) at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid plaque strain is reliably computed from routine B-mode imaging using clinical ultrasound machines. High plaque strain correlates with known high-risk echolucent morphology. Strain measurement can complement identification of patients at high risk for plaque disruption and stroke.
Authors: Brajesh K Lal; Robert W Hobson; Peter J Pappas; Richard Kubicka; Meera Hameed; Elie Y Chakhtoura; Zafar Jamil; Frank T Padberg; Paul B Haser; Walter N Durán; Ellie Y Chakhtura Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: John J Ricotta; Ali Aburahma; Enrico Ascher; Mark Eskandari; Peter Faries; Brajesh K Lal Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Mark Fisher; Annlia Paganini-Hill; Aldana Martin; Michele Cosgrove; James F Toole; Henry J M Barnett; John Norris Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-01-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Tobias Saam; Hunter R Underhill; Baocheng Chu; Norihide Takaya; Jianming Cai; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Tomáš Vaisar; Jie H Hu; Sina A Gharib; David A Dichek; Nathan Airhart; Kate Fox; Jay Heinecke; Roberto F Nicosia; Ted Kohler; Zachary E Potter; Gabriel M Simon; Melissa M Dix; Benjamin F Cravatt Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 23.213