Literature DB >> 21889701

Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.

John J Ricotta1, Ali Aburahma, Enrico Ascher, Mark Eskandari, Peter Faries, Brajesh K Lal.   

Abstract

Management of carotid bifurcation stenosis is a cornerstone of stroke prevention and has been the subject of extensive clinical investigation, including multiple controlled randomized trials. The appropriate treatment of patients with carotid bifurcation disease is of major interest to the community of vascular surgeons. In 2008, the Society for Vascular Surgery published guidelines for treatment of carotid artery disease. At the time, only one randomized trial, comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS), had been published. Since that publication, four major randomized trials comparing CEA and CAS have been published, and the role of medical management has been re-emphasized. The current publication updates and expands the 2008 guidelines with specific emphasis on six areas: imaging in identification and characterization of carotid stenosis, medical therapy (as stand-alone management and also in conjunction with intervention in patients with carotid bifurcation stenosis), risk stratification to select patients for appropriate interventional management (CEA or CAS), technical standards for performing CEA and CAS, the relative roles of CEA and CAS, and management of unusual conditions associated with extracranial carotid pathology. Recommendations are made using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, as has been done with other Society for Vascular Surgery guideline documents.[corrected] The perioperative risk of stroke and death in asymptomatic patients must be <3% to ensure benefit for the patient. CAS should be reserved for symptomatic patients with stenosis of 50% to 99% at high risk for CEA for anatomic or medical reasons. CAS is not recommended for asymptomatic patients at this time. Asymptomatic patients at high risk for intervention or with <3 years life expectancy should be considered for medical management as the first-line therapy.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889701     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  101 in total

1.  [Treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: improvement of evidence with new SPACE-2 design necessary].

Authors:  T Reiff; H Amiri; P A Ringleb; O Jansen; W Hacke; H H Eckstein; G Fraedrich; H Mudra; U Mansmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  Management of carotid stenosis in women: consensus document.

Authors:  Paola De Rango; Martin M Brown; Didier Leys; Leys Didier; Virginia J Howard; Wesley S Moore; Maurizio Paciaroni; Peter Ringleb; Caron Rockman; Valeria Caso
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The risk of carotid stenosis in head and neck cancer patients after radiation therapy.

Authors:  David J Carpenter; Yvonne M Mowery; Gloria Broadwater; Anna Rodrigues; Amy J Wisdom; Jennifer A Dorth; Pretesh R Patel; Cynthia K Shortell; Robert Clough; David M Brizel
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.337

4.  Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Bjoern D Suckow; Claire L Griffin; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney; Timothy G Lukovits; Robert M Zwolak; Mark F Fillinger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients.

Authors:  Emily L Spangler; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; David H Stone; Marc L Schermerhorn; Richard J Powell; Jack L Cronenwett; Brian W Nolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Carotid artery stenting has increased risk of external carotid artery occlusion compared with carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Kevin Brown; Dina S Itum; Joshua Preiss; Yazan Duwayri; Ravi K Veeraswamy; Atef Salam; Thomas F Dodson; Luke P Brewster
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  [Current guidelines on carotid artery stenting. Critical evaluation].

Authors:  R Hein-Rothweiler; H Mudra
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Early hemodynamic characteristics of eversion and patch carotid endarterectomies.

Authors:  Jesse Chait; Michael Nicoara; Pavel Kibrik; Yuriy Ostrozhynskyy; Natalie Marks; Sareh Rajaee; Anil Hingorani; Enrico Ascher
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-05-08

9.  Haematomas after carotid endarterectomy can be reduced by direct pressure to the neck postoperatively.

Authors:  R Saghir; G Humm; T Rix
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 10.  Transitions of care and long-term surveillance after vascular surgery.

Authors:  Andrew W Hoel; Kimberly C Zamor
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.