| Literature DB >> 28273858 |
Ben D Tall1, Jayanthi Gangiredla2, Christopher J Grim3, Isha R Patel4, Scott A Jackson5,6, Mark K Mammel7, Mahendra H Kothary8, Venugopal Sathyamoorthy9, Laurenda Carter10, Séamus Fanning11, Carol Iversen12, Franco Pagotto13, Roger Stephan14, Angelika Lehner15, Jeffery Farber16, Qiong Q Yan17, Gopal R Gopinath18.
Abstract
Cronobacter (previously known as Enterobacter sakazakii) is a genus of Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase-negative, catalase-positive, rod-shaped bacteria of the family Enterobacteriaceae. These organisms cause a variety of illnesses such as meningitis, necrotizing enterocolitis, and septicemia in neonates and infants, and urinary tract, wound, abscesses or surgical site infections, septicemia, and pneumonia in adults. The total gene content of 379 strains of Cronobacter spp. and taxonomically-related isolates was determined using a recently reported DNA microarray. The Cronobacter microarray as a genotyping tool gives the global food safety community a rapid method to identify and capture the total genomic content of outbreak isolates for food safety, environmental, and clinical surveillance purposes. It was able to differentiate the seven Cronobacter species from one another and from non-Cronobacter species. The microarray was also able to cluster strains within each species into well-defined subgroups. These results also support previous studies on the phylogenic separation of species members of the genus and clearly highlight the evolutionary sequence divergence among each species of the genus compared to phylogenetically-related species. This review extends these studies and illustrates how the microarray can also be used as an investigational tool to mine genomic data sets from strains. Three case studies describing the use of the microarray are shown and include: (1) the determination of allelic differences among Cronobacter sakazakii strains possessing the virulence plasmid pESA3; (2) mining of malonate and myo-inositol alleles among subspecies of Cronobacter dublinensis strains to determine subspecies identity; and (3) lastly using the microarray to demonstrate sequence divergence and phylogenetic relatedness trends for 13 outer-membrane protein alleles among 240 Cronobacter and phylogenetically-related strains. The goal of this review is to describe microarrays as a robust tool for genomics research of this assorted and important genus, a criterion toward the development of future preventative measures to eliminate this foodborne pathogen from the global food supply.Entities:
Keywords: Cronobacter; data mining; microarray
Year: 2017 PMID: 28273858 PMCID: PMC5374366 DOI: 10.3390/microarrays6010006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microarrays (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3905
Number of gene features associated with the Cronobacter genomes that were used in the design of the microarray a.
| Species and Strain | Number of Alleles from Each Strain | Number Present (% Present) b | Genome NCBI c Accession Numbers | Plasmid Name, NCBI Accession Numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2035 | 1904 (93.5) | NC_009778 | pESA3, NC_009780.1; pESA2, NC_009779.1 |
|
| 139 | 132 (94.9) | AJLB00000000.1 | pESA3-like, AJLB00000000.1 |
|
| 201 | 171 (85.0) | AJKT01000000.1 | pESA3- and pCSA2151, AJKT01000000.1 |
|
| 202 | 188 (93.0) | AJLC00000000.1 | pESA3- and pCTU3-like, AJLC00000000.1) |
|
| 304 | 266 (87.5) | AJLA00000000.1 | pESA3-like, AJLA00000000.1 |
|
| 4402 | 4039 (91.7) | NC_013282.2 | pCTU1, NC_013283.1; pCTU2, NC_013284.1; pCTU3, NC_013285 |
|
| ||||
|
| 1582 | 1434 (90.6) | AJKV01000000.1 | pCMA1, NZ_CP013941.1/CP013941.1; pCMA2, NZ_CP013942.1/CP013942.1 |
|
| 257 | JXTD00000000.1 | pCTU1-like, JXTD00000000.1 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 781 | 745 (95.4) | AJKZ01000000.1 | pCTU1-like, AJKZ01000000.1 |
|
| 2580 | 2386 (92.5) | AJKY01000000.1 | pCTU1-like, AJKY01000000.1 |
|
| 1754 | 1708 (97.3) | AJKU01000000.1 | No Plasmid |
|
| 1315 | 1201 (91.3) | AJKW01000000.1 | pEAS3-like, AJKW01000000.1 |
|
| 2611 | 2498 (95.7) | CAKW00000000.1 | pCTU1-like, CAKW00000000.1 |
a Table was adapted from Table 1 as reported by Tall et al. [18]. Note that two genomes of C. sakazakii strains E899 and SP291 were compared with that of Cronobacter sakazakii strain BAA-894 and their average nucleotide identities were similar to that of strain BAA-894; b See Tall et al. [18] for more details. c NCBI: National Center for Biotechnology Information; d subsp.: subspecies
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of 379 Cronobacter strains after interrogation with the Food and Drug Administration Cronobacter microarray. The tree was developed using the Neighbor net (SplitsTree4) joining method which was constructed using gene differences observed among the strains as determined by evaluation of the strains with the 21,658 probe sets associated with the microarray. Microarray analysis of these strains was able to group the strains into eight clusters which aligned and complemented each of the seven Cronobacter species epithets and phylogenetically-related species. Each species identity, originally found by using species-specific PCR assays as described by Tall et al. [18], was in complete agreement with the species identification found by microarray analysis. The scale bar represents a 0.01 base substitution (bp) per site.