Literature DB >> 23724777

Pan-genome analysis of the emerging foodborne pathogen Cronobacter spp. suggests a species-level bidirectional divergence driven by niche adaptation.

Christopher J Grim1, Michael L Kotewicz, Karen A Power, Gopal Gopinath, Augusto A Franco, Karen G Jarvis, Qiong Q Yan, Scott A Jackson, Venugopal Sathyamoorthy, Lan Hu, Franco Pagotto, Carol Iversen, Angelika Lehner, Roger Stephan, Séamus Fanning, Ben D Tall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Members of the genus Cronobacter are causes of rare but severe illness in neonates and preterm infants following the ingestion of contaminated infant formula. Seven species have been described and two of the species genomes were subsequently published. In this study, we performed comparative genomics on eight strains of Cronobacter, including six that we sequenced (representing six of the seven species) and two previously published, closed genomes.
RESULTS: We identified and characterized the features associated with the core and pan genome of the genus Cronobacter in an attempt to understand the evolution of these bacteria and the genetic content of each species. We identified 84 genomic regions that are present in two or more Cronobacter genomes, along with 45 unique genomic regions. Many potentially horizontally transferred genes, such as lysogenic prophages, were also identified. Most notable among these were several type six secretion system gene clusters, transposons that carried tellurium, copper and/or silver resistance genes, and a novel integrative conjugative element.
CONCLUSIONS: Cronobacter have diverged into two clusters, one consisting of C. dublinensis and C. muytjensii (Cdub-Cmuy) and the other comprised of C. sakazakii, C. malonaticus, C. universalis, and C. turicensis, (Csak-Cmal-Cuni-Ctur) from the most recent common ancestral species. While several genetic determinants for plant-association and human virulence could be found in the core genome of Cronobacter, the four Cdub-Cmuy clade genomes contained several accessory genomic regions important for survival in a plant-associated environmental niche, while the Csak-Cmal-Cuni-Ctur clade genomes harbored numerous virulence-related genetic traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23724777      PMCID: PMC3680222          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Cronobacter is a newly described genus that includes opportunistic pathogens formerly classified as Enterobacter sakazakii[1]. E. sakazakii was first described by Farmer et al. [2], using DNA-DNA hybridization studies and phenotyping to reclassify a group of yellow-pigmented Enterobacter cloacae isolates attributed to cases of neonatal meningitis [3] into 15 phenotypically distinct biogroups. A 16th biogroup was later described [4]. Although E. sakazakii was synonymous with the original single species epithet, Iversen et al. [1], using a polyphasic approach based on extensive genotypic and phenotypic criteria, reclassified strains of this diverse species within the novel genus, Cronobacter. Originally, the genus contained six recognized species, C. sakazakii (Csak, biogroups 1–4, 7, 8, 11, and 13), C. malonaticus (Cmal, biogroups 5, 9, and 14), C. muytjensii (Cmuy, biogroup 15), C. turicensis (Ctur, biogroup 16), C. dublinensis, subsp. dublinensis, lausannensis, and lactaridi (biogroups 12, Cdubdub, 10, Cdublau and 6, Cdublact, respectively) and C. genomospecies 1. Joseph et al. [5] have updated this taxonomy by designating members assigned to the genomospecies group 1 as C. universalis (Cuni, biotype 16c) and identifying a new species, C. condimenti, based on a single known strain using a seven gene multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme. Cronobacter have been primarily associated with infections in infants, but recent reports have highlighted the risk posed to immune compromised adults, particularly the elderly [6,7]. Cronobacter have been recovered from a wide variety of foods, including powdered infant formula (PIF), follow-on formulas, weaning foods, milk and sodium caseinate powders, rice seed, dried herbs, teas, and spices, spiced meats, dried flour or meal (corn, soy, potato, wheat, and rice), dried infant and adult cereals, dried vegetables, grains, tofu, powdered ice tea, mixed salad vegetables, tomato harvesting bins, chocolate, candied cough drops, and pastas [8-12]. Nevertheless, PIF remains epidemiologically linked to outbreaks of neonatal and infantile meningitis, and Cronobacter are routinely isolated from household PIF preparation equipment, including blenders and spoons. Although PIF is regarded as an important source of this pathogen, the main reservoir for Cronobacter seems to be the environment [13]. Cronobacter are capable of surviving and persisting in low-water environments [8], owing to their distribution in dry food goods. Although the exact genetic determinant remains to be identified, Breeuwer et al. reported that intracellular accumulation of trehalose, among other features, prevents protein denaturation and membrane fusion and these may contribute to the desiccation-resistant properties of the bacterium [14,15]. The expression of an exopolysaccharide composed of cellulose may also be required [16]. Thermoresistance of Cronobacter has also been reported [14,17]. Proteins unique to thermotolerant Cronobacter strains have been identified by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry; for example, a protein, Mfla_1165, which is a homologue of a hypothetical protein from the thermotolerant bacterium Methylobacillus flagellatus KT [18]. Recently, an 18-kb region containing 22 open reading frames that are up-regulated under heat adaptation growth conditions has also been reported [19]. The major feature of the region is a cluster of conserved genes, which have significant homology to proteins involved in bacterial stress responses, including heat, oxidation, and acid. Previously, Kucerova et al. [20] reported on the genome sequence of C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894, which was isolated from a PIF product that was used in a neonatal intensive care unit and which gave rise to an outbreak in 2001 in Tennessee, USA. In an attempt to further determine virulence factors and mechanisms of pathogenicity in this bacterium, the genome of C. turicensis z3032, cultured from the blood of one child with meningitis [21] was sequenced [22]. In this paper, we describe the genomes of the type strains of Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis, Cronobacter malonaticus, Cronobacter muytjensii, and Cronobacter universalis. Comparative genomics was performed on these six genomes, as well as two previously published, closed genomes of Cronobacter. We identified and characterized the features associated with the core and pan genome of this bacterial genus in an attempt to understand the evolution of these organisms and the genetic content of each species.

Results

General features of sequenced Cronobacter genomes

Whole genome sequencing of six species type strains of Cronobacter was performed (Table  1). Each genome analyzed in this study contained a single chromosome and a large repFIB plasmid, similar to Csak BAA-894 (pESA3) and Ctur z30232 (pCTU1), except the genome of C. muytjensii ATCC 51329. Previously, Franco and Hu et al. [23] reported that only 75% of strains of C. muytjensii harbored this plasmid, while the incidence of this plasmid in other Cronobacter spp. is 99%. The G + C% content of each genome ranged from 55 to 57% (Table  1). Each of the six draft genomes contained seven ribosomal RNA operons, as inferred from comparative genomics with Csak BAA-894 and Ctur z3032 (Table  1).
Table 1

General features of genomes used in this study

StrainC. malonaticus LMG 23826C. dub. dublinensis LMG 23823C. dub. lausannensis LMG 23824C. dub. lactaridi LMG 23825C. muytjensii ATCC 51329C. universalis NCTC 9529C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894aC. turicensis z3032a
Contigs/chromosomes
69
41
105
96
32
16
1 + 2 plasmids
1 + 3 plasmids
Mean contig length
64,056
113,291
43,937
46,393
136,123
274,265
N/A
N/A
Scaffolds
4
14
15
10
4
8
N/A
N/A
Mean sequence gap length
297
246
692
98
285
166
N/A
N/A
Genome size (bp)
4,419,871
4,644,913
4,613,339
4,453,746
4,355,922
4,388,239
4,530,777
4,599,092
CDS
4,041
4,172
4,123
4,077
3,973
3,977
4,211
4,296
G + C%
54.99
56.16
56.84
56.87
56.17
55.79
56.7
57.2
Coverage of contigs
15.33
20.28
13.8
14.63
17.36
25.38
N/A
N/A
tRNAs
79
85
92
86
81
89
82
86
rRNA operons77777777

aC. sakazakii strain BAA-894 and C. turicensis strain z3032 were previously sequenced and are considered to be closed reference genomes [20,22].

General features of genomes used in this study aC. sakazakii strain BAA-894 and C. turicensis strain z3032 were previously sequenced and are considered to be closed reference genomes [20,22].

Whole genome phylogeny and Cronobacter taxonomy

To confirm the taxonomic standing of Cronobacter genus novum and species [1], genome scale analyses based on nucleotide sequence were performed. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) has emerged as one of the predominant genomics alternatives to DNA-DNA hybridization. The pairwise ANI values between all Cronobacter genomes used in this study support the current proposed species and subspecies classification of Cronobacter (Table  2). Although pairwise ANI values provide a benchmark of divergence (or similarity) between two genomes, evolutionary relationships between more than two genomes cannot be inferred from this analysis. Therefore, a genome scale phylogenetic analysis was performed on all eight Cronobacter genomes (Figure  1). This analysis reveals that extant Cronobacter species have diverged into two clusters, Cdub-Cmuy and Csak-Cmal-Cuni-Ctur, from the most recent shared ancestral species. The Cdub-Cmuy clade evolved as a monophyletic clade for much of its evolutionary history before diverging into two species. However, we expect the reconstruction of this evolutionary history to change significantly as new species that fall within this clade are identified; for example, C. condimenti[5]. In contrast, the other four species evolved as four distinct monophyletic lineages. The phylogenetic tree is, again, in good agreement with the current proposed taxonomy of Cronobacter[1], as well as recent proposed Cronobacter phylogenies derived from MLST [24] and sequence of the rpoB gene [25,26], although more resolving than rpoB sequence for Csak-Cmal [27], and rpoA[28].
Table 2

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values for eight genomes

ANIBAA-894LMG 23825LMG 23823NCTC 952951329LMG 23826LMG 23824z3032
Csak ATCC BAA-894
---
88.59
88.43
93.28
88.57
94.61
88.57
91.85
Cdublac LMG 23825
88.57
---
97.24
89.21
91.94
88.77
98.36
88.81
Cdubdub LMG 23823
88.44
97.22a
---
88.97
91.65
88.54
97.29
88.55
Cuni NCTC 9529
93.36
89.33
89.04
---
89.16
93.87
89.33
93.71
Cmuy ATCC 51329
88.5
92
91.67
89.21
---
88.6
92.03
88.77
Cmal LMG 23826
94.59
88.76
88.46
93.77
88.57
---
88.72
92.13
Cdublau LMG 23824
88.6
98.27
97.29
89.26
91.96
88.77
---
88.79
Ctur z303291.8888.8288.5493.6488.7792.188.82---

aNumbers in bold represent pairwise comparisons that are higher than the current species level threshold, 95.00 for ANI, indicating same species.

Figure 1

Evolutionary relationships of eight genomes. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on 574,352 bp alignment of homologous sequences was computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method for nucleotide substitution. The bootstrap supports, as percentage, are shown next to the branches. The scale bar represents 0.01 base substitutions per site.

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values for eight genomes aNumbers in bold represent pairwise comparisons that are higher than the current species level threshold, 95.00 for ANI, indicating same species. Evolutionary relationships of eight genomes. Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree based on 574,352 bp alignment of homologous sequences was computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method for nucleotide substitution. The bootstrap supports, as percentage, are shown next to the branches. The scale bar represents 0.01 base substitutions per site.

Cronobacter core genome

A Cronobacter core genome of orthologous, shared genes was determined for the eight strains analyzed in this study. The chromosome of each of the six type strains of Cronobacter consists of approximately 4,000 CDS (Table  1). Of this number, we determined that 3,160 CDS comprise the core genome of Cronobacter (Additional file 1: Table S1). Previously, Kucerova et al. [20] reported a core genome of 1,899 gene sequences, among five species using microarray hybridization based on the genome of Csak BAA-894; C. universalis was not included. Among the genes comprising the core genome of Cronobacter, we found several genetic determinants that are experimentally-linked to phenotypic traits, such as reduction of nitrate, utilization of D-mannose, D-mannitol, sucrose, L-arabinose, cellobiose, and D-xylose (Additional file 1: Table S1), which have been previously reported by Iversen et al. [1] as biochemical traits of the genus as determined by phenotypic microarray. Additionally, we found genes, gene clusters or operons responsible for the following characteristics in the Cronobacter core genome: utilization of fructoselysine, psicoselysine, isomaltulose (palatinose), N-acetylglucosamine (nag), N-acetylmannosamine, and 2-ketogluconate; a carotenoid pigmentation cluster homologous to Pantoea spp., type IV pili (TFP), σ chaperone/usher (CU) fimbriae, three γ1 CU fimbriae, enterobactin siderophore gene clusters, ferric hydroxymate transporter, several ferric iron receptors, and two ferrous iron transporters [29], histidine transporter, yeh osmoprotectant transporter, zinc transporter, albicidin resistance protein coding gene, macrolide-specific ABC-type efflux pump and several putative multidrug resistance genes, opp oligopeptide transporter system, dpp dipeptide transporter, sap peptide transporter, cellulose biosynthesis genes (bcs, yhj), kps capsule polysaccharide biosynthesis cluster, glucans biosynthesis cluster, dimethyl sulfoxide reductase, alkanesulfonate monoxygenase and transporter, ytf putative sugar transporter operon, and hexuronate operon (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Cronobacter spp. pan-genome

For the approximately 900 non-core CDS in each of the six Cronobacter genomes; i.e., not included in the Cronobacter core genome, we determined which chromosomal genes comprised dispensable and unique genomic regions (GR) and which were putative mobile genomic islands and elements. Plasmid genes (approximately 130 CDS per genome, see Additional file 2: Table S2) were not investigated in this study. In total, we identified 84 dispensable genomic regions that were present in two or more Cronobacter genomes, and 45 unique genomic regions (Table  3). We overlaid these combined 129 genomic regions onto the genome-scale phylogeny, determined by alignment of orthologous sequence of the core genome (Figure  2).
Table 3

Non-core and unique genomic regions (GRs) identified in eight genomes

GR#Feature(s) or putative feature(s)aCdubdubCdublacCdublauCmuyCturCuniCmalCsakShared locus
1
Acyl reductase-transketolase
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
2
Taurine metabolism
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
3
Environmental persistence capsule, yih
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
4
Filamentous hemagglutinin outer membrane protein
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
 
5
ybh transporter, putative antibiotic resistance efflux pump
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
 
6
γ4 fimbriae
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
 
7
Phospho-alpha-glucosidase (α-methyl D-glucoside)
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
 
8
DMSO, urea (urt), biotin utilization, MAR (4-aminobutyrate)
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
 
9
π fimbriae
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
 
10
Hydrolase
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
 
11
Transporter and Rhodanese-related sulfurtransferases
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
l
12
Lysozyme, virulence regulator
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
 
13
LPS/core OS 2 gene pair
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
 
14
MFS transporter, regulator and dehydrogenase
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
f
15
Membrane hydrolase
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
 
16
Large repetitive hemolysin
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
 
17
Putative ABC transporter and DMT permease
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
d
18
Beta-glucosidase
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
 
19
Hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
 
20
Fatty acid desaturase
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
 
21
OM autotransporter barrel
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
a
22
NO reductase
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
 
23
Oxidoreductase
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
 
24
Spermidine-preferential uptake system
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
 
25
Glucuronyl hydrolase, sucrose permease
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
 
26
Hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
 
27
Hypothetical proteins
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
 
28
CRISPR
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
 
29
Inositol
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
 
30
Non-heme chloroperoxidase, MxcK
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
g
31
Acetyltransferase
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
 
32
Hypothetical proteins
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
 
33
Putative membrane protein and regulator
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
h
34
Malonate
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
 
35
Formate dehydrogenase
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
 
36
Phenolic sulfur ester
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
37
Deoxyguanosinetriphosphate triphosphohydrolase
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
38
Ferrichrome iron receptor
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
39
Putative membrane and hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
i
40
Arylsulfatase
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
j
41
Redundant methionine transporter
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
42
Ethanolamine permease and deaminase
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
43
Ferrichrome-iron receptor
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
44
Hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
45
Ornithine monooxygenase, BtrH
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
46
Transmembrane tRNA/peptide synthetase
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
47
Indole
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
48
Putative LPS modification operon
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
i
49
Toxin-antitoxin pair
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
 
50
Exported protein
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
 
51
CynX
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
 
52
γ4 fimbriae
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
l
53
Acyl enzymes
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
 
54
Membrane protein
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
 
55
Curli
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
 
56
Methyl-accepting chemotaxis and/or hypothetical protein
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
-
n
57
Macrophage infectivity potentiator-related protein and regulator
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
 
58
Putative monooxygenase and transcriptional regulators
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
d
59
Oligopeptide transport system
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
60
Hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
61
Methyl-accepting chemotaxis and/or hypothetical proteins
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
62
Beta-lactamase
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
j
63
Peptide chain release factor
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
 
64
Chemotaxis
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
e
65
Helicase
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
 
66
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
 
67
Dulcitol
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
 
68
Short-chain dehydrogenase and regulator
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
d
69
Type I RMS
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
c
70
Pyroxidine/pyroxidal metabolism
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
e
71
qseBC, ompV
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
f
72
Maltose phosphate PTS and glucosidase
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
73
Cellulose degradation
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
74
Transporter and secreted pair
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
 
75
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
 
76
β fimbriae
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
77
Periplasmic or lipo-protein
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
 
78
α-mannosidase
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
 
79
Regulator and hypothetical protein
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
 
80
Short chain dehydrogenase
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
 
81
Membrane protein
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
 
82
γ1 fimbriae
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
 
83
(+/−) putative membrane and (+/−) hypothetical proteins; variable
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
 
84
Arsenic resistance; MFS transporter, regulator and hypothetical proteins
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
i
85
Putative monoamine oxidase, carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase and hypothetical proteins
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
l
86
Hypothetical proteins
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
 
87
Putative monoamine oxidase, carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase and hypotheticals; homologous to GR85
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
i
88
Putative sulfatase and hypothetical proteins
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
a
89
LysE Superfamily exporter
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
d
90
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
91
Radical SAM and ABC ATPase proteins
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
92
Mannanase
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
g
93
Putative reductases and hypothetical proteins
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
i
94
Membrane protein
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
k
95
D-glucarate permease, transketolase, homologous to GR117
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
c
96
Type I RMS
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
d
97
Modulator of drug activity B (mdaB), MFS transporter and regulator
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
n
98
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
99
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
h
100
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
101
FHA
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
102
L-rhamnose ABC transporter
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
103
Urea carboxylase
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
 
104
Heteropolysaccharide degradation
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
b
105
qseBC, ompV
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
d
106
Sigma factor, catalase
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
k
107
Beta-glucosidase, cellobiose
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
 
108
Short chain dehydrogenase
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
 
109
Paralogous enzyme island
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
 
110
DND operon
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
 
111
Xanthosine utilization
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
 
112
κ fimbriae
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
 
113
Putative epoxide hydrolase
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
b
114
Cupin superfamily homologues
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
d
115
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
 
116
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
i
117
D-glucarate permease, transketolase
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
 
118
Large exoproteins involved in heme utilization or adhesion
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
 
119
MipA homologue and signal transduction pair
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
i
120
Hemolysin, activator and secretion
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
 
121
Membrane spanning and hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
a
122
Hypothetical proteins
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
123
Csak invasin locus
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
124
Unique transporter
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
e
125
Nucleoside-sugar efflux
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
126
γ1 fimbriae
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
127
nanC, sugar isomerase, hydrolase
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
128
Paralogous enzyme island
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
 
129Sialic acid-------+ 

aFeature(s), or putative feature(s), were assigned based on BLASTp homology of encoded ORFs to known proteins. Shared chromosomal loci of genomic regions are indicated by matching letters. Features in bold are biochemical traits, used previously to biotype Cronobacter isolates.

Figure 2

Gain and loss of putative genomic regions among eight genomes. Genomic regions (see Table 3 and Additional file 4: Table S2 for more details) are shown as present (+, shaded boxes) or absent (−, dashed borders), representing most likely point of gain or loss for each genome or group of genomes. The ancestral core comprises the current eight Cronobacter core genome (Additional file 3: Table S1) and GIs 1–34, 55–57, 67, 83. Underlined genomic regions are those whose current species distribution occurred through both insertions and deletions in the evolutionary history of Cronobacter.

Non-core and unique genomic regions (GRs) identified in eight genomes aFeature(s), or putative feature(s), were assigned based on BLASTp homology of encoded ORFs to known proteins. Shared chromosomal loci of genomic regions are indicated by matching letters. Features in bold are biochemical traits, used previously to biotype Cronobacter isolates. Gain and loss of putative genomic regions among eight genomes. Genomic regions (see Table 3 and Additional file 4: Table S2 for more details) are shown as present (+, shaded boxes) or absent (−, dashed borders), representing most likely point of gain or loss for each genome or group of genomes. The ancestral core comprises the current eight Cronobacter core genome (Additional file 3: Table S1) and GIs 1–34, 55–57, 67, 83. Underlined genomic regions are those whose current species distribution occurred through both insertions and deletions in the evolutionary history of Cronobacter. In addition to the extant Cronobacter spp. core genome described earlier (Additional file 1: Table 1), a number of dispensable or accessory genomic regions, 39 in all, were identified as being a likely component of the last common ancestor core genome (Figure  2). These included metabolic operons for the utilization of taurine, inositol, malonate, and dulcitol (galactitol); two chaperone-usher fimbriae operons and curli biosynthetic genes; a CRISPR element; an alpha- and beta-glucosidase; genes encoding the yih environmental persistence capsule described in Salmonella species; two large repetitive protein/hemolysin clusters; spermidine uptake system; nitric oxide reductase system; a 58.4-kb genomic region missing in Cuni NCTC9529 containing gene clusters for the reduction of dimethyl sulfoxide, uptake of biotin and urea (urt), and a multiple antibiotic resistance cluster; as well as several genomic regions containing largely hypothetical protein encoding genes (Figure  2, Table  3). We also identified 45 non-core dispensable genomic regions, which were acquired by two or more species of Cronobacter after diverging from their most recent common ancestor. This subset of genomic regions included 12 that were present in the Cdub-Cmuy cluster and included two ferrichrome iron receptors, fcT and fcuA orthologues [29]; methionine and ethanolamine utilization gene clusters; and tryptophanase (indole). Additional non-core genomic regions included a β class (GR76, Csak and Cdublac), a γ1 class (GR82, Cmal and Csak) and a γ4 class chaperone-usher fimbriae (GR52, Cdub and Ctur); an oligopeptide transport system (GR59, Cdub); pyridoxine metabolism cluster (GR70, Cdublac and Cdublau); maltose uptake system (GR72, Cdublac and Cmuy); cellulose degradation operon (GR73, Cdublac and Cmuy); and an α-mannosidase (GR78, Csak and Ctur). Each Cronobacter genome contained a number of unique genomic regions; however, the vast majority of these contained genes encoded hypothetical proteins. Notable exceptions to this trend were genomic regions encoding for mannan degradation (GR92, Cdublau); L-rhamnose ABC transporter (GR102, Cmuy); urea decomposition (GR103, Cmuy); dnd (degradation during electrophoresis), DNA sulfur modification system, (GR110 Ctur); heteropolysaccharide degradation (GR104, Ctur); putative epoxide hydrolase gene cluster (GR113, Cuni); κ class chaperone-usher fimbriae (GR112, Cuni); invasin locus (GR123, Csak); γ1 class chaperone-usher fimbriae (GR126, Csak); and sialic acid utilization (GR127 and 129, Csak) (Table  3). A number of chromosomal loci were found to harbor multiple genomic islands (Table  3, shared locus); for example, GR 33 and 99 in Cmuy ATCC 51329 (Table  3). Additionally, there were two insertion sites; namely, tRNA-Pro-GGG and the TCA cycle isocitrate dehydrogenase gene, icdA, where several small genomic regions were inserted in a multiple cassette fashion for several genomes, indicating insertion loci of genomic plasticity (Table  3, Table  4).
Table 4

Putative mobilome of genomes

Putative mobile elementInsertion siteOther elements at this chromosomal locus
T6SS1 (Csak)
tRNA-Phe-GAA
 
T6SS2 (Csak, Cmal, Cuni, Cdublau, Ctur)
tRNA-Phe-GAA
GR 21, 88, 121
Transposon-Phage (Cuni)
tRNA-Met-CAT
GR 122 (Csak)
Prophage (Cdublac, Ctur); small integron (Cmal)
tRNA-gly-CCC
GR 112 (Cuni)
Prophage (Cdublac, Cmal, Ctur); tandem prophages (Cdubdub); Prophage-transposon (Cdublau); transposon (Cuni)
putative serine chemoreceptor protein gene
GR 16
Prophage (Csak)
large repetitive protein gene
 
IS (Cmuy)
yfgG
GR 104, 113
Prophage (Cdubdub, Cmal); transposon (Ctur)
tRNA-Arg-CCT
GR 69, 95
Prophage (Cdubdub, Csak)
tRNA-Pro-GGG
GR 17, 58, 68, 89, 96, 105, 114, 123
TE (Cmal)
hydroxyethylthiazole kinase gene
 
O-antigen region
galF-gnd
 
IS (Cmuy)
tRNA-Asn-GTT
GR 27
T6SS3 (missing in Cmuy)
tRNA-Asn-GTT
 
Prophage (Cdublau); T6SS4 with transposon interruption (Cdublau), or at end (Cdublac)
tRNA-Asn-GTT
 
Prophage (Cmal)
fliE
 
ICE (Cmuy)
msdB-pykA intergenic
 
Prophage (Cdubdub)
SraC/RyeA RNA
GR81
Prophage (Cmal); TE (Ctur)
ycgN
 
Transposon (Cdublau)
interruption GR 59
 
Prophage (Cdublau, Cmuy, Csak)
ycjR-ycjS
 
Tellurium resistance transposon (Csak)
interruption GR 8
 
Transposon (Cuni)
GR 30
GR 92
Transposon (Cdubdub)
uvdE
 
IS600 (Cdub); Prophage (Cdublau)
ydcW intergenic
GR 31 (variable)
Prophage (Cuni)
phnO intergenic
 
T6SS5 (highly variable, missing in Cdublac, Cmuy)
tRNA-Val-GAC
GR 33, 99
Copper-resistance transposon (Cuni (+ABC transporter), Cmuy); Prophage (Cmuy, Ctur)
icdA
GR 39, 48, 84, 87, 93, 116, 119
Prophage (Csak)
ycdX
 
Prophage (Cdublau)
mntR-ybiP intergenic
 
Prophages (Cuni, Csak, Ctur); T6SS6 (Cdub, Ctur, Csak - truncated)
tRNA-Arg-TCT
GR 11, 52, 85
Prophage (Csak); Transposon (Cmal), TE (Cdublau)
tRNA-Thr-CGT
 
TE (Cmal)
pilB
 
Prophage (Cdublac, Cmal); TE (Cdublau, Cdubdub, Cuni); Transposon (Cdublau)
tRNA-Leu-CAA
GR 110
ICE (Cuni)
large repetitive protein gene
 
T6SS7-repeat region (all, variable and conserved genes)
tpiA intergenic
 
Small integron (Csak)
yicC-yicG
 
Core OS variable region
kdtB-kbl
 
Prophage (Cmuy); TE (Cdubdub, Cuni)
tRNA-SeC(p)-TCA
 
Copper and silver-resistance transposon (Csak)yhiN-puuA 
Putative mobilome of genomes

Cronobacter spp. mobilome

Not surprisingly, each Cronobacter genome contained multiple prophage or prophage-like elements (Table  4, Figure  3). In several cases, prophages of different Cronobacter genomes were inserted at the same chromosomal locus (Table  4, Figure  3). Indeed, phylogenetic analysis of the integrase gene of all prophages revealed a trend of several clusters in which the chromosomal insertion site was shared among all members of a phylogenetic cluster (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Interestingly, the genomes of C. universalis NCTC 9529 and C. muytjensii ATCC 51329 harbor a 57 kb integrative conjugative element (ICE), which is 99% identical between strains (Table  4). This mobile genetic element is most closely related to the ICE-KKS family of integrating and conjugative elements, found in β- and γ- proteobacteria and represented by ICEKKS1024677, which carries polychlorinated biphenyl degradation genes [30]. For the Cronobacter ICE, in addition to the conjugal transfer, integrase, and replication/partition genes, there is a 21 kb internal segment which carries unique genes among this class of ICEs. Most of the genes were annotated as encoding hypothetical proteins, so it is unclear what phenotypic trait or characteristic(s) are encoded in this region.
Figure 3

Mobilome of spp. Putative mobilome elements from eight Cronobacter genomes were mapped on C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894 chromosome, using the Microbial Genome Viewer [31]. Symbols on outside ring represent insertion sites of putative mobile genetic elements (Table 4, with mobile elements plotted clock-wise, from the top) – prophages, transposons and insertion sequences, and integrative-conjugative element-like elements (green circles), variable type six secretion system clusters (orange circles), genomic regions at insertion sites (red circles), and LPS (O-antigen and core OS) regions (yellow circles). Blue ring represents genes on the + strand and purple ring represents genes on the – strand. Middle rings represent COGs on + (outer) and – (inner) strands (COG functional category legend provided in lower right of figure). Innermost circle represent % G + C.

Mobilome of spp. Putative mobilome elements from eight Cronobacter genomes were mapped on C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894 chromosome, using the Microbial Genome Viewer [31]. Symbols on outside ring represent insertion sites of putative mobile genetic elements (Table 4, with mobile elements plotted clock-wise, from the top) – prophages, transposons and insertion sequences, and integrative-conjugative element-like elements (green circles), variable type six secretion system clusters (orange circles), genomic regions at insertion sites (red circles), and LPS (O-antigen and core OS) regions (yellow circles). Blue ring represents genes on the + strand and purple ring represents genes on the – strand. Middle rings represent COGs on + (outer) and – (inner) strands (COG functional category legend provided in lower right of figure). Innermost circle represent % G + C. Additionally, each genome contained a number of transposons (Table  4). Phylogenetic analysis of the transposases clustered the genes together based on multiple copies of the same transposon found in each genome, but not with regard to insertion site (Additional file 4: Figure S2). Most of the transposons carried very few additional genes or hypothetical protein encoding genes. There were three noticeable exceptions, a transposon carrying the tellurium resistance island found in the genome of Csak BAA-894, a transposon carrying a copper resistance island found in the genomes of Cuni NCTC 9529 and Cmuy ATCC 51329, inserted near the isocitrate dehydrogenase gene, icdA, and a transposon inserted in the yhiN - puuA intergenic region of Csak BAA-894, carrying copper and silver resistance genes (Table  4, Additional file 2: Table S2). We also observed a number of type six secretion system (T6SS) gene clusters in the eight Cronobacter genomes (Table  4, Figure  3, Additional file 2: Table S2). All genomes contained a very large T6SS cluster as a component of the Cronobacter core genome, which is flanked by a highly variable region of different sizes in each genome containing several hypothetical protein CDS as well as those encoding numerous homologues of vgrG, Rhs-family and YD-repeat proteins (Table  4, T6SS7; Additional file 2: Table S2). Additionally, seven of the eight genomes contain four to six accessory T6SS clusters; Cmuy ATCC 51329 does not contain any additional T6SS clusters. The gene content of each cluster is variable between clusters present at different chromosomal loci, but largely conserved among clusters located at the same chromosomal locus. Previously, we reported the presence of a T6SS cluster on a repFIB plasmid in strains of C. sakazakii[23]. Not surprisingly, many of the mobile genetic elements, such as lysogenic prophages, in Cronobacter genomes are inserted at tRNA loci (Table  4). We also found T6SS gene clusters and some genomic regions inserted at tRNA sites. And as with genomic regions, we observed cassette-like insertion of multiple types of genetic elements at single sites (Table  4).

Discussion

Like many bacterial genera, the taxonomy of Cronobacter has evolved and expanded as more sensitive molecular- and sequence-based tools have developed. In this study, we performed two genome-scale sequence analyses to discern the taxonomic relationships of extant Cronobacter species, namely ANI and genome-scale alignment and phylogenetic reconstruction using syntenic, orthologous chromosomal sequence. The taxonomic reclassification by Iversen et al. [1], which relied on both DNA studies and on results from biochemical tests, was confirmed by both analyses. We found that the ANI results from this study were more meaningful in discerning relationships between pairs of Cronobacter species that are more distantly related as compared to DNA-DNA hybridization [1]. This is most likely a reflection of the differences in the range of meaningful values for each analysis. We were able to confirm the presence or absence of eight of the genetic determinants of the biochemical characteristics used previously for Cronobacter biotyping (Table  3); namely, indole (tryptophanase), dulcitol (galactitol), malonate, myo-inositol, and two genomic regions that are likely responsible for utilization of 4-aminobutyrate and production of α-methyl glucoside (Farmer biotype 15 [2]), as well as those biotyping traits contained in the core genome of these eight strains, utilization of palatinose and putrescine (Additional file 1: Table S1). The distribution of these operons and genes were in complete agreement with the biochemical results and species description reported by Iversen et al. [1]. Inositol fermentation has recently been proposed as a marker of pathogenicity for Cronobacter, based on the presence of the inositol monophosphatase gene (suhB) in pathogenic strains [32]. In this study, we found that this gene, which is seemingly ubiquitous and highly conserved among the Enterobacteriaceae, is a component of the Cronobacter core genome (Additional file 1: Table S1). Additionally, we found that the inositol utilization operon (GR29, Table  3, Additional file 2: Table S2) was present, and functional [1], in the genomes of strains isolated from the environment (water sources), Cuni NCTC 9529T, Cdubdub LMG 23823T, Cdublac LMG 23825T, and absent in the genomes of pathogenic strains, Cmal LMG 23826T and Csak BAA-894. Using comparative genomics, we were able to define the syntenic Cronobacter core genome for the eight species genomes analyzed in this study, which is approximately 77% of the total protein coding sequences, on average, per genome. This value is considerably higher as compared to the core genome content of other genera. In fact, the core genus genome size of Cronobacter is comparable to the core genome size of certain bacterial species [33,34], and considerably larger than that of the related E. coli[35]. This is a reflection of the phylogenetic closeness of this genus, as shown in the ANI results (Table  2), and indicative of a more “closed” Cronobacter genome. The core genome size is considerably higher than that reported by Kucerova et al. [20], 1,899 genes, which incorporated four of the six strains used in this study. This discrepancy is best explained by the divergent evolution of the genus to form two distinct clades (Figure  1). This divergent evolution would undoubtedly have a significant impact on the efficiency of hybridization of probes designed from the sequence of Csak BAA-894 to DNA from strains of Cdub and Cmuy, resulting in the smaller reported core genome size [20]. With regard to the genomic regions revealed by the comparative genomic hybridization analysis of Csak BAA-894, reported by Kucerova et al. [20], we classified 12 of the 15 reported genomic regions as part of the Cronobacter mobilome. They included T6SS clusters, GR1, 2 (ESA_0292-00302), 9, and 15 (repFIB plasmid-associated T6SS); putative prophages, GR3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12; transposons, GR7, 14; and O-antigen gene clusters, GR5 (Additional file 2: Table S2, from [20]). The comparably large core genome size and overall high sequence identity within the genus support the hypothesis that these two clades have evolved as a result of sympatric speciation; however, the divergence of the two clades indicates that they are under different evolutionary pressures, to some degree. In addition to the divergent evolution of shared genome content, several non-core genomic regions were found to be either present (or absent) in one of the two species-complex clades. For example, the Cdub-Cmuy clade has acquired 13 genomic regions that are not present in the Csak-Cmal-Cuni-Ctur clade (Figure  2). An examination of the dispensable gene content of each species provides clues as to differences in environmental niches and pathogenicity, such as virulence potential. Among putative virulence-related properties, the presence and diversity of appendages within the Cronobacter genus is intriguing. Many causative agents of meningitis, such as Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa encode for type IV pili (TFP), necessary to colonize in the face of shear forces of blood flow, associated with the capillary beds of the blood–brain barrier. The Cronobacter core genome also contains the genes that encode a TFP. Bioinformatically, the presence of a TFP, as opposed to a T2SS, was hypothesized due to the presence of the TFP-unique gene, pilT, and the genetic organization of the pilQ loci, similar to the TFP of P. aeruginosa. Several chaperone-usher fimbriae were also present in the core genome. Additionally, seven other chaperone-usher fimbriae were differentially distributed among the eight genomes analyzed in this study (Table  3), including a P pilus homologue (GR9, missing in Csak BAA-894), which is a prominent virulence factor of uropathogenic E. coli, also a causative agent of neonatal meningitis. Csak BAA-894 and Cmal LMG 23826T harbor a unique type I fimbriae (GR82), which is absent in the other genomes, and Csak BAA-894 also harbors a β class CU fimbriae (GR76), shared with Cdublac LMG 23825T, and a second, unique type I fimbriae (GR126, which corresponds to GR8 of Kucerova et al. [20]). Of interest is the finding that Cmuy ATCC 51329T possesses only one additional fimbriae operon, in addition to those encoded in the genus core genome. Some genomes also harbored curli biosynthesis genes, homologous to curli of E. coli and tafi fimbriae of Salmonella. Although implicated directly in cell-cell contact and biofilm formation, these organelles likely contribute to the colonization of Cronobacter, after initial cell attachment has taken place. We hypothesize that this operon was a component of the ancestral core, and has been lost in all strains of C. sakazakii and C. muytjensii (data not shown). In addition to appendages potentially involved in adhesion, several type V(a), or autotransporter, secretion loci are present in the genomes of the Cronobacter analyzed in this study, which are annotated as hemolysin, adhesin, outer membrane autotransporter barrel, filamentous hemagglutinin, large exoproteins, etc. They are found as accessory genomic regions (GRs 4, 16, 21, 50, 101, 123), and present as single genes or pairs of genes in the core genome (Additional file 2: Table S2). Of particular interest is GR123, found exclusively in Csak BAA-894, and GR118, found in the three routinely isolated pathogenic species, Ctur, Cmal, and Csak. GR123 contains two putative invasins and an eae homologue and may constitute a pathogenicity island. This region was found to be present in the genomes of three neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outbreak strains (including Csak BAA-894) and absent in the C. sakazakii type strain, ATCC 29544, which was isolated from a child’s throat (defined as a component of cluster 3, Additional file 1: Table S1, from [20]). Also interesting is the presence of two genomic regions (GRs 127 and 129) involved in the utilization of sialic acid in the genome of Csak BAA-894. Sialic acid is a generic term for a family of derivatives of the nine carbon sugar acid, neuraminic acid, which are found at surface-exposed end positions of eukaryotic, primarily animal, tissues. Many pathogens have evolved to either coat their surfaces with sialic acid derivatives, in order to evade the innate immune response, or to use this biopolymer as a nutrient source [36]. In addition to Csak BAA-894, we found that 55 out of 57 strains of C. sakazakii are able to utilize N-acetyl-neuraminic acid, a derivative of sialic acid (by Biolog PM Microarray, data not shown). Conversely, no other Cronobacter strains were able to utilize this substrate, except four of six C. turicensis strains (data not shown). It has been hypothesized that the environmental niche of Cronobacter is as a plant commensal [37]. Accordingly, we found several genomic features, both in the Cronobacter core- and pan-genome, which would be beneficial for an organism to possess in this habitat. For example, the Cronobacter core genome contains the maltose transporter operon, malGFE- malKlamBmalM, repressor, malT, and α-glucosidases that can hydrolzye maltose to two glucose molecules. Maltose is primarily restricted to plants, particularly seed tissues. An operon for the transport and hydrolysis of isomaltulose is also present in the core genome of Cronobacter, in agreement with the taxonomic description of Iversen et al. [1], and previously reported by Lehner et al. [38]. Isomaltulose (palatinose), also used in the original Cronobacter biotyping scheme, is a disaccharide of glucose and fructose and a component of honey and sugar cane. Additionally, we found the following characteristics in the core Cronobacter core genome: utilization of arabinogalactan, a major component of plant gums; transport and utilization of xylose, a precursor to hemicellulose; galacturonate, the principal component of pectin; albicidin, a phytotoxin of Xanthomonas spp., resistance; β-carotene pigmentation, and several α and β glucosidases. It is of interest to find that an albicidin resistance protein coding gene was found as a core genome component. Albicidin is a bacteriocin-like molecule that degrades DNA gyrase, both of bacterial and chloroplast origins [39]. Speculatively, Cronobacter possessing a gene promoting resistance to the action of albicidin adds further evidence for a plant-associated evolutionary history, as well as, the impartation of a competitive edge to Cronobacter survival in a mixed organism environment where competition is controlled through the action of bacteriocin expression. In addition to these conserved features, several other genomic regions and operons were found that have putative functions for plant association, or homologies to proteins from plant commensals. These include GR95/117 of Cmuy ATCC 51329 and Cuni NCTC 9529; GR70, metabolism of pyroxidine/pyroxidal (vitamin B6), of which green plants and grains and nuts contain high amounts; GR72, maltose derivative metabolism; GR73, galactose (glycoside-pentoside-hexuronide) homologue permease (possible role in cellulose degradation); GR92, mannanase; GR102, L-rhamnose ABC transporter; and GR107 of Ctur z3032. Several inherent properties of Cronobacter have been proposed as mechanisms that aid the bacteria in survival and persistence in dried foods, such as PIF, food powders, and spices. Chief among these have been enhanced heat resistance, as compared to other enterics and contaminating microorganisms. However, most studies have reported variable results in terms of heat resistance at the strain level, and cross-tolerance to other environmental stressors, such as pH and water activity. One consistent finding is an unusually high resistance to dry stress [17]. Accordingly, we found several genomic determinants, which would be beneficial in a dry or low water activity environment, including cellulose biosynthesis (bcs and yhj) operons, colanic acid EPS, capsular biosynthesis operon (kps), an environmental persistence capsule (yih, GR3), and curli (GR55). Recently, it has been reported that the synergistic expression of the yih operon encoded capsule, cellulose and curli or tafi provides resistance to desiccation stress in Salmonella[40,41]. We hypothesize that the same genetic determinants, combined with other capsular and EPS operons, likely play a similar role in the environmental persistence and desiccation resistance in Cronobacter. Although not all Cronobacter produce curli, those species possess several other fimbriae which could substitute in this adhesin and/or scaffolding role. In addition to this extracellular matrix, we also found two operons, present in all Cronobacter genomes, that encode transporters involved in osmoprotection, yeh and bet operons, with homology to plant commensals and pathogens, such as Burkholderia and Erwinia species.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found a large core genome among representative type species strains of the genus Cronobacter, which encodes factors for enhanced environmental persistence and plant commensalism, as well as numerous appendages that may aid in attachment and colonization, advantageous both in the environment and in the host. Conversely, we found that the genus has diverged in a bidirectional manner. The Cdub-Cmuy clade has evolved to be more adapted for primarily an environmental and plant association niche, while the other clade, particularly Csak and Cmal, has evolved and acquired accessory genes that have enhanced its virulence capacity, and host species adaption, and promoted pathogenicity. Clearly, in silico analysis of strain level differences, coupled with experimental studies, will reveal which of these factors are most important for environmental, plant, and human pathogenic lifestyles of this group of organisms. This study establishes a powerful platform for further functional genomics research of this diverse group; an important prerequisite towards future development of countermeasures against this foodborne pathogen.

Methods

Bacterial strains

Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis LMG 23823, C. dublinensis subsp. lausannensis LMG 23824, C. dublinensis subsp. lactaridi LMG 23825, C. malonaticus LMG 23826, and C. universalis NCTC 9529 were acquired from Dr. Carol Iversen; C. muytjensii ATCC 51329 was acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA).

DNA sequencing and assembly

Genomic DNA was fragmented to an average size of 3 kb using a Covaris (Woburn, MA) E210 focused-ultrasonicator. Then, Multiplex Identifier (MID)-tagged, paired-end libraries were prepared using a modified version of the 454 Life Sciences (Roche, Branford, CT) protocol. The procedure has been adapted to 96-well plate format using automated pipetting robots, and includes QC steps and AMPure (Beckman-Coulter (Agencourt), Indianapolis, IN) bead-based DNA purifications between enzymatic reactions as described by Fisher et al. [42]. Libraries were pooled and sequenced using the Roche 454 FLX pyrosequencer to an average depth of 15× coverage. Raw sequence data were processed using manufacturer’s software and quality filtering algorithms. Resulting demultiplexed data sets were assembled using Celera Assembler v6.1 (http://sourceforge.net/projects/wgs-assembler/).

Annotation and comparative genomics

Genomic contigs were submitted as multiple-sequence FASTA files and annotated using the RAST annotation server [43], to identify RNAs and protein-coding genes. The RAST server is a free web portal (rast.nmpdr.org), provided by the SEED [44], which automatically and rapidly curates both closed and draft genomes using a subsystems approach, as opposed to a tedious gene by gene method. Comparative genomics was performed as previously reported [29,44-47], with some exceptions. In this study, genome to genome comparisons were performed primarily with the SEED viewer [48], which utilizes bi-directional protein-protein BLAST (blastp) sequence comparison of translated ORFs. Because sequencing resulted in draft genomes (Table  1), we used the closed genomes of C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894 (BioProject Accession PRJNA12720) and C. turicensis z3032 (BioProject Accession PRJEA39965) as references to align draft contigs using MUMmer [49]. The syntenic core genome of Cronobacter was determined using the SEED viewer sequence based comparative genomics tool. To ensure the most complete and robust syntenic core gene set among the genomes analyzed, the genomes of C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894 and C. turicensis z3032 were uploaded and annotated via the RAST server, and used as reference genomes for comparative genomics. For the draft genomes, genes at the end of a contig or interrupted by contig gaps were reconciled using bi-directional BLASTN analysis, against all other genomes. Genomic regions (GR), defined as regions which are present in one or more Cronobacter genomes and missing in at least one other genome (dispensable), were identified as previously reported [44,45,47]. Most probable insertion and deletions of genomic regions were estimated as done previously [44], using a maximum parsimony approach. Clade-specific, as well as ancestral genome genomic regions were identified by collapsing shared genome genomic regions to the farthest branch point that maintained the most parsimonious outcome. For clarity, only the last common ancestor to all eight Cronobacter spp. genomes analyzed in this study is shown in Figure  2. It is assumed that each branch point would produce a hypothetical ancestral genome common to those genomes beyond that branch point. Genomic region identification numbers were assigned such that genomic regions that are unique or shared by an individual Cronobacter genome were successively numbered. Mobile genetic elements were identified in a similar fashion as genomic regions. In addition, mobility was determined based on significant identity alignments, using BLASTP, of its member ORFs to phage integrases and structural genes, transposases, and conjugative pili transfer genes, contained in the GenBank NR database. Average nucleotide identity, by BLAST, (ANI) [50] was computed using the JSpecies package [51]. A genome-scale phylogeny was computed as previously described [44,47,52], with some exceptions. As opposed to using sets of orthologues of individual genes, 16 conserved chromosomal syntenic regions, were first aligned individually using MEGA version 5 [53], and then concatenated. These regions spanned the following gene loci from C. sakazakii ATCC BAA-894 (GenBank CP000783.1), ESA_00107-00117, 00146–00223, 00399–00443, 00671–00737, 01048–01094, 03220–03278, 03280–03289, 03331–03353, 03358–03402, 03447–03511, 03536–03550, 03554–03599, 03614–03648, 03871–03886, 03982–04015, 04016–04029, and included 591 coding sequences (CDS) and intergenic regions. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed in MEGA, using the neighbor-joining method. The bootstrap consensus tree shown in Figure  1 was inferred from 1000 replicates. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree, i.e., the number of base substitutions per site, as determined using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method. The original dataset included 600,341 bps. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 574,352 positions in the final dataset.

Accession numbers

The Whole Genome Shotgun projects described in this study have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accessions, C. dublinensis subsp. dublinensis LMG 23823, [GenBank: AJKZ00000000]; C. dublinensis subsp. lausanensis LMG 23824, [GenBank: AJKY00000000]; C. dublinensis subsp. lactaridii LMG 23825, [GenBank: AJKX00000000]; C. malonaticus LMG 23826, [GenBank: AJKV00000000]; C. muytjensii ATCC 51329, [GenBank: AJKU00000000]; and C. universalis NCTC 9529, [GenBank: AJKW00000000]. The versions described in this paper are the first, XXXX01000000.

Competing interest

All of the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CJG carried out the comparative genomics analyses and wrote the paper. MLK coordinated DNA sequencing with IGS (Baltimore, MD). All authors helped to draft the manuscript. FP, CI, AL, RS, MLK, GG, SF, KAP, CJG, AAF, KGJ, VS, and BDT conceived of the study and of the concepts involved in the formation of an international Cronobacter consortium. All authors participated in the study’s design and in the coordination of efforts by the consortium. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1: Table S1

Core genome of eight Cronobacter spp. Core genome components are shown, using Csak ATCC BAA-894 as a reference genome, to include contig, start, stop, length in bp, and % identity (BLASTn). Genomes were annotated using the RAST server; gene identification numbers (ID) were assigned by RAST. Click here for file

Additional file 2: Table S2

Feature tables of eight Cronobacter genomes. Annotated feature tables, generated by RAST, of the eight Cronobacter genomes used in this study. Each feature (column E) was assigned as a component of: a genomic region (GR, column A), the mobilome (column B), a plasmid (column C), or the core Cronobacter genome (column D); however, not all features could be assigned to one of these classifications. Several feature characteristics are presented. The feature table for each genome is given as a separate worksheet, named according to the particular strain. Click here for file

Additional file 3: Figure S1

Phylogenetic relationship of integrases of eight genomes of Cronobacter spp. See Additional file 2: Table S2 for further details of each putative integrase. Notation to the right of each integrase indicates insertion locus. Click here for file

Additional file 4: Figure S2

Phylogenetic relationship of transposases of eight genomes of Cronobacter spp. See Additional file 2: Table S2 for further details of each putative transposase. Notation to the right of each transposase indicates insertion locus. Click here for file
  51 in total

1.  Characterization of a collection of Enterobacter sakazakii isolates from environmental and food sources.

Authors:  Denise Drudy; Michele O'Rourke; Mary Murphy; Niall R Mullane; Rebecca O'Mahony; Lorraine Kelly; Matthias Fischer; Suhad Sanjaq; Pauline Shannon; Patrick Wall; Micheál O'Mahony; Paul Whyte; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  A top-down proteomics approach for differentiating thermal resistant strains of Enterobacter sakazakii.

Authors:  Tracie L Williams; Steven R Monday; Sharon Edelson-Mammel; Robert Buchanan; Steven M Musser
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Cronobacter gen. nov., a new genus to accommodate the biogroups of Enterobacter sakazakii, and proposal of Cronobacter sakazakii gen. nov., comb. nov., Cronobacter malonaticus sp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov., Cronobacter genomospecies 1, and of three subspecies, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis subsp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis subsp. nov. and Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi subsp. nov.

Authors:  Carol Iversen; Niall Mullane; Barbara McCardell; Ben D Tall; Angelika Lehner; Séamus Fanning; Roger Stephan; Han Joosten
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 4.  New trends in emerging pathogens.

Authors:  Niels Skovgaard
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  The core genome of the anaerobic oral pathogenic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Authors:  Jorg Brunner; Floyd R A Wittink; Martijs J Jonker; Mark de Jong; Timo M Breit; Marja L Laine; Johannes J de Soet; Wim Crielaard
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  In Silico identification of pathogenic strains of Cronobacter from Biochemical data reveals association of inositol fermentation with pathogenicity.

Authors:  Stephen E Hamby; Susan Joseph; Stephen J Forsythe; Nadia Chuzhanova
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Adhesive properties of Enterobacter sakazakii to human epithelial and brain microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Mange; Roger Stephan; Nicole Borel; Peter Wild; Kwang Sik Kim; Andreas Pospischil; Angelika Lehner
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  The phytotoxin albicidin is a novel inhibitor of DNA gyrase.

Authors:  Saeed M Hashimi; Melisa K Wall; Andrew B Smith; Anthony Maxwell; Robert G Birch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Claire Hoede; Olivier Tenaillon; Valérie Barbe; Simon Baeriswyl; Philippe Bidet; Edouard Bingen; Stéphane Bonacorsi; Christiane Bouchier; Odile Bouvet; Alexandra Calteau; Hélène Chiapello; Olivier Clermont; Stéphane Cruveiller; Antoine Danchin; Médéric Diard; Carole Dossat; Meriem El Karoui; Eric Frapy; Louis Garry; Jean Marc Ghigo; Anne Marie Gilles; James Johnson; Chantal Le Bouguénec; Mathilde Lescat; Sophie Mangenot; Vanessa Martinez-Jéhanne; Ivan Matic; Xavier Nassif; Sophie Oztas; Marie Agnès Petit; Christophe Pichon; Zoé Rouy; Claude Saint Ruf; Dominique Schneider; Jérôme Tourret; Benoit Vacherie; David Vallenet; Claudine Médigue; Eduardo P C Rocha; Erick Denamur
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  27 in total

1.  Reconstituting the History of Cronobacter Evolution Driven by Differentiated CRISPR Activity.

Authors:  Haiyan Zeng; Jumei Zhang; Qingping Wu; Wenjing He; Haoming Wu; Yingwang Ye; Chengsi Li; Na Ling; Moutong Chen; Juan Wang; Shuzhen Cai; Tao Lei; Yu Ding; Liang Xue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Functional genomic characterization of virulence factors from necrotizing fasciitis-causing strains of Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Christopher J Grim; Elena V Kozlova; Duraisamy Ponnusamy; Eric C Fitts; Jian Sha; Michelle L Kirtley; Christina J van Lier; Bethany L Tiner; Tatiana E Erova; Sandeep J Joseph; Timothy D Read; Joshua R Shak; Sam W Joseph; Ed Singletary; Tracy Felland; Wallace B Baze; Amy J Horneman; Ashok K Chopra
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Profiling of Virulence Determinants in Cronobacter sakazakii Isolates from Different Plant and Environmental Commodities.

Authors:  Niharika Singh; Mamta Raghav; Shifa Narula; Simran Tandon; Gunjan Goel
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 4.  Insights into virulence factors determining the pathogenicity of Cronobacter sakazakii.

Authors:  Niharika Singh; Gunjan Goel; Mamta Raghav
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Comparative Genotypic and Phenotypic Analysis of Cronobacter Species Cultured from Four Powdered Infant Formula Production Facilities: Indication of Pathoadaptation along the Food Chain.

Authors:  Qiongqiong Yan; Juan Wang; Jayanthi Gangiredla; Yu Cao; Marta Martins; Gopal R Gopinath; Roger Stephan; Keith Lampel; Ben D Tall; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Development of a Custom-Designed, Pan Genomic DNA Microarray to Characterize Strain-Level Diversity among Cronobacter spp.

Authors:  Ben Davies Tall; Jayanthi Gangiredla; Gopal R Gopinath; Qiongqiong Yan; Hannah R Chase; Boram Lee; Seongeun Hwang; Larisa Trach; Eunbi Park; YeonJoo Yoo; TaeJung Chung; Scott A Jackson; Isha R Patel; Venugopal Sathyamoorthy; Monica Pava-Ripoll; Michael L Kotewicz; Laurenda Carter; Carol Iversen; Franco Pagotto; Roger Stephan; Angelika Lehner; Séamus Fanning; Christopher J Grim
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 7.  Strategies for the identification and tracking of cronobacter species: an opportunistic pathogen of concern to neonatal health.

Authors:  Qiongqiong Yan; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Genome Sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii Serogroup O:4, Sequence Type 4 Strain CDC 2009-03746, Isolated from a Fatal Case of Infantile Meningitis.

Authors:  Christopher J Grim; Gopal R Gopinath; Karen G Jarvis; Venugopal Sathyamoorthy; Larissa H Trach; Hannah R Chase; Ben D Tall
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 9.  Novel approaches to improve the intrinsic microbiological safety of powdered infant milk formula.

Authors:  Robert M Kent; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Colin Hill; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Complete genome sequence and phenotype microarray analysis of Cronobacter sakazakii SP291: a persistent isolate cultured from a powdered infant formula production facility.

Authors:  Qiongqiong Yan; Karen A Power; Shane Cooney; Edward Fox; Gopal R Gopinath; Christopher J Grim; Ben D Tall; Matthew P McCusker; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.