Literature DB >> 28272742

Bounds to parapatric speciation: A Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibility model involving autosomes, X chromosomes, and mitochondria.

Ilse Höllinger1,2, Joachim Hermisson1.   

Abstract

We investigate the conditions for the origin and maintenance of postzygotic isolation barriers, so called (Bateson-)Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities or DMIs, among populations that are connected by gene flow. Specifically, we compare the relative stability of pairwise DMIs among autosomes, X chromosomes, and mitochondrial genes. In an analytical approach based on a continent-island framework, we determine how the maximum permissible migration rates depend on the genomic architecture of the DMI, on sex bias in migration rates, and on sex-dependence of allelic and epistatic effects, such as dosage compensation. Our results show that X-linkage of DMIs can enlarge the migration bounds relative to autosomal DMIs or autosome-mitochondrial DMIs, in particular in the presence of dosage compensation. The effect is further strengthened with male-biased migration. This mechanism might contribute to a higher density of DMIs on the X chromosome (large X-effect) that has been observed in several species clades. Furthermore, our results agree with empirical findings of higher introgression rates of autosomal compared to X-linked loci.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid incompatibility; Introgression on X and autosomes; Large X-effect; Speciation-with-gene-flow; Two-locus DMI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28272742     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   4.171


  11 in total

Review 1.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Gene flow mediates the role of sex chromosome meiotic drive during complex speciation.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; Emily L Landeen; Kathleen E Gordon; Thomas Rzatkiewicz; Sarah B Kingan; Anthony J Geneva; Jeffrey P Vedanayagam; Christina A Muirhead; Daniel Garrigan; David L Stern; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  The Population Genetics of Evolutionary Rescue in Diploids: X Chromosomal versus Autosomal Rescue.

Authors:  Robert L Unckless; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Sexual conflict through mother's curse and father's curse.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Manisha Munasinghe; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  The Effects on Parapatric Divergence of Linkage between Preference and Trait Loci versus Pleiotropy.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  The Limits to Parapatric Speciation II: Strengthening a Preexisting Genetic Barrier to Gene Flow in Parapatry.

Authors:  Alexandre Blanckaert; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  In search of the Goldilocks zone for hybrid speciation.

Authors:  Alexandre Blanckaert; Claudia Bank
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The rates of introgression and barriers to genetic exchange between hybridizing species: sex chromosomes vs autosomes.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; Himani Sachdeva
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  When genes move, genomes collide.

Authors:  Yaniv Brandvain; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The limits to parapatric speciation 3: evolution of strong reproductive isolation in presence of gene flow despite limited ecological differentiation.

Authors:  Alexandre Blanckaert; Claudia Bank; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.