Literature DB >> 31054851

Sexual conflict through mother's curse and father's curse.

J Arvid Ågren1, Manisha Munasinghe2, Andrew G Clark3.   

Abstract

In contrast with autosomes, lineages of sex chromosomes reside for different amounts of time in males and females, and this transmission asymmetry makes them hotspots for sexual conflict. Similarly, the maternal inheritance of the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) means that mutations that are beneficial in females can spread in a population even if they are deleterious in males, a form of sexual conflict known as Mother's Curse. While both Mother's Curse and sex chromosome induced sexual conflict have been well studied on their own, the interaction between mitochondrial genes and genes on sex chromosomes is poorly understood. Here, we use analytical models and computer simulations to perform a comprehensive examination of how transmission asymmetries of nuclear, mitochondrial, and sex chromosome-linked genes may both cause and resolve sexual conflicts. For example, the accumulation of male-biased Mother's Curse mtDNA mutations will lead to selection in males for compensatory nuclear modifier loci that alleviate the effect. We show how the Y chromosome, being strictly paternally transmitted provides a particularly safe harbor for such modifiers. This analytical framework also allows us to discover a novel kind of sexual conflict, by which Y chromosome-autosome epistasis may result in the spread of male beneficial but female deleterious mutations in a population. We christen this phenomenon Father's Curse. Extending this analytical framework to ZW sex chromosome systems, where males are the heterogametic sex, we also show how W-autosome epistasis can lead to a novel kind of nuclear Mother's Curse. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive framework to understand how genetic transmission asymmetries may both cause and resolve sexual conflicts.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomic conflict; Mitochondria; Sex chromosomes; Sexual antagonism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31054851      PMCID: PMC8808426          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2018.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  78 in total

1.  Evidence that the human X chromosome is enriched for male-specific but not female-specific genes.

Authors:  Martin J Lercher; Araxi O Urrutia; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Merging theory and mechanism in studies of gynodioecy.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Pascal Touzet; Maia F Bailey
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  The genetics of sex chromosomes: evolution and implications for hybrid incompatibility.

Authors:  Norman A Johnson; Joseph Lachance
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Coadaptation of mitochondrial and nuclear genes, and the cost of mother's curse.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; M Florencia Camus; Edward H Morrow; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Selfish evolution of cytonuclear hybrid incompatibility in Mimulus.

Authors:  Andrea L Case; Findley R Finseth; Camille M Barr; Lila Fishman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Intergenomic interactions between mitochondrial and Y-linked genes shape male mating patterns and fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Winston K W Yee; Björn Rogell; Bernardo Lemos; Damian K Dowling
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mitochondrial-Nuclear Interactions Mediate Sex-Specific Transcriptional Profiles in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jim A Mossman; Jennifer G Tross; Nan Li; Zhijin Wu; David M Rand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.

Authors:  A E Wright; J E Mank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Sex-biased chromatin and regulatory cross-talk between sex chromosomes, autosomes, and mitochondria.

Authors:  Katherine Silkaitis; Bernardo Lemos
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.027

View more
  11 in total

1.  Mitochondrial-Y chromosome epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Manisha Munasinghe; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Migration restores hybrid incompatibility driven by mitochondrial-nuclear sexual conflict.

Authors:  Manisha Munasinghe; Benjamin C Haller; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Sex-limited chromosomes and non-reproductive traits.

Authors:  Aivars Cīrulis; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.364

4.  Mitonuclear interactions alter sex-specific longevity in a species without sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Ben A Flanagan; Ning Li; Suzanne Edmands
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Temperature-Sensitive Reproduction and the Physiological and Evolutionary Potential for Mother's Curse.

Authors:  Kristi L Montooth; Abhilesh S Dhawanjewar; Colin D Meiklejohn
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution between the sex chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Katrine K Lund-Hansen; Colin Olito; Edward H Morrow; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Adaptive co-evolution of mitochondria and the Y-chromosome: A resolution to conflict between evolutionary opponents.

Authors:  Michael J Wade; Laurel Fogarty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  Sex-specific aging in animals: Perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Anne M Bronikowski; Richard P Meisel; Peggy R Biga; James R Walters; Judith E Mank; Erica Larschan; Gerald S Wilkinson; Nicole Valenzuela; Ashley Mae Conard; João Pedro de Magalhães; Jingyue Ellie Duan; Amy E Elias; Tony Gamble; Rita M Graze; Kristin E Gribble; Jill A Kreiling; Nicole C Riddle
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 9.304

9.  The Aphid X Chromosome Is a Dangerous Place for Functionally Important Genes: Diverse Evolution of Hemipteran Genomes Based on Chromosome-Level Assemblies.

Authors:  Yiyuan Li; Bo Zhang; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Mitonuclear conflict and cooperation govern the integration of genotypes, phenotypes and environments.

Authors:  David M Rand; Jim A Mossman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.