Literature DB >> 28271870

Participation in psychosocial oncology and quality-of-life research: a systematic review.

Claire E Wakefield1, Joanna E Fardell2, Emma L Doolan2, Neil K Aaronson3, Paul B Jacobsen4, Richard J Cohn2, Madeleine King5.   

Abstract

Quality-of-life and psychosocial oncology studies that have low participation might have less precision, less statistical power, and can have non-response bias. In this systematic Review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo, for paediatric studies published in 2010-15 and adults studies published 2014-15. Studies were eligible if they were original studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 years at diagnosis) with cancer or their parents, or adult patients with cancer; and assessed psychosocial outcomes, including quality of life, depression, anxiety, wellbeing, distress, coping, or adjustment as a primary or secondary outcome. We assessed participation reporting quality, calculated percentages of participation achieved, and measured the influence of study design and participant characteristics. We reviewed 311 studies including a total of 87 240 adults, children, and parents. Mean participation across studies was more than 70% (paediatric participation was 72% and adult participation was 74%). Many studies did not report data essential for the assessment of participation, especially for non-respondents. Studies using a longitudinal cohort design had higher participation than randomised trials. In paediatric studies, recruitment of participants at diagnosis, face to face, and with the use of short questionnaires yielded higher participation. Other study design characteristics (method of data collection, who enrolled the participants, and incentives) and patient characteristics (cancer type, patient or parent age, and sex) did not affect participation in either paediatric or adult studies. Researchers can use these data to improve reporting quality and make evidence-based choices to maximise participation in future studies.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28271870     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  20 in total

1.  Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents' and adolescents' views and perceptions.

Authors:  Eden G Robertson; Claire E Wakefield; Joanne Shaw; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Brittany C McGill; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Herbal medicine for depression and anxiety: A systematic review with assessment of potential psycho-oncologic relevance.

Authors:  K Simon Yeung; Marisol Hernandez; Jun J Mao; Ingrid Haviland; Jyothirmai Gubili
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.878

Review 3.  Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-25

Review 4.  Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca E Hill; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn; Joanna E Fardell; Mary-Ellen E Brierley; Emily Kothe; Paul B Jacobsen; Kate Hetherington; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-10-25

5.  Genetic Testing in the Pediatric Nephrology Clinic: Understanding Families' Experiences.

Authors:  Suzanne M Nevin; Jordana McLoone; Claire E Wakefield; Sean E Kennedy; Hugh J McCarthy
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2020-12-15

6.  Strategies for Successful Recruitment and Retention of Parents in Pediatric Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: A Qualitative Study in Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  Kimberly S Canter; Gabriela Vega; Alejandra Perez Ramirez; Janet E Deatrick; Anne E Kazak
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2020-06-01

7.  Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies.

Authors:  Morgan M Millar; Anita Y Kinney; Nicola J Camp; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Mia Hashibe; David F Penson; Anne C Kirchhoff; Deborah W Neklason; Alicia W Gilsenan; Gretchen S Dieck; Antoinette M Stroup; Sandra L Edwards; Carrie Bateman; Marjorie E Carter; Carol Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Psychosomatic Disorders in Patients with Gastrointestinal Diseases: Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study of 1186 Inpatients.

Authors:  Lijuan Feng; Zichun Li; Xuerong Gu; Jiahui Jiang; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Factors associated with unwillingness to seek professional help for depression: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Eisho Yoshikawa; Toshiatsu Taniguchi; Nanako Nakamura-Taira; Shin Ishiguro; Hiromichi Matsumura
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-04

10.  Online, Group-Based Psychological Support for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Results from the Recapture Life Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Claire E Wakefield; Sarah J Ellis; Brittany C McGill; Mark W Donoghoe; Phyllis Butow; Richard A Bryant; Susan M Sawyer; Pandora Patterson; Antoinette Anazodo; Megan Plaster; Kate Thompson; Lucy Holland; Michael Osborn; Fiona Maguire; Catherine O'Dwyer; Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.