| Literature DB >> 28271401 |
Elek Molnár1, Karen Luyt2,3, Anikó Váradi4, Shavanthi Rajatileka5, David Odd2,6, Matthew T Robinson7, Alexandra C Spittle1, Louis Dwomoh5, Maggie Williams8, David Harding3, Miles Wagstaff9, Marie Owen9, Charlene Crosby8, Jared Ching2.
Abstract
Preterm delivery is associated with neurodevelopmental impairment caused by environmental and genetic factors. Dysfunction of the excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) and the resultant impaired glutamate uptake can lead to neurological disorders. In this study, we investigated the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; g.-200C>A and g.-181A>C) in the EAAT2 promoter in susceptibility to brain injury and neurodisability in very preterm infants born at or before 32-week gestation. DNA isolated from newborns' dried blood spots were used for pyrosequencing to detect both SNPs. Association between EAAT2 genotypes and cerebral palsy, cystic periventricular leukomalacia and a low developmental score was then assessed. The two SNPs were concordant in 89.4% of infants resulting in three common genotypes all carrying two C and two A alleles in different combinations. However, in 10.6% of cases, non-concordance was found, generating six additional rare genotypes. The A alleles at both loci appeared to be detrimental and consequently, the risk of developing cerebral palsy increased four- and sixfold for each additional detrimental allele at -200 and -181 bp, respectively. The two SNPs altered the regulation of the EAAT2 promoter activity and glutamate homeostasis. This study highlights the significance of glutamate in the pathogenesis of preterm brain injury and subsequent development of cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Furthermore, the described EAAT2 SNPs may be an early biomarker of vulnerability to neurodisability and may aid the development of targeted treatment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Brain injury; Cerebral palsy; Excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2); Glutamate; Glutamate transporter; Neurodevelopmental disorder; Periventricular leukomalacia; Preterm infant; Promoter activity; Pyrosequencing; Single nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28271401 PMCID: PMC5840247 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-017-0462-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Neurobiol ISSN: 0893-7648 Impact factor: 5.590
Birth-related information and neurodevelopmental outcomes (n = 541). Values are numbers with % or means ± standard deviation, as appropriate. All measures were analysed independently so denominator may vary
| Measure | Avon Premature Infant Project (APIP; | Gloucestershire Royal Hospital ( | Southmead Hospital ( | St Michael’s Hospital ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age (week) | 29.9 (±2.0) | 27.8 (±2.2) | 26.8 (±1.8) | 27.4 (±1.7) |
| Birth weight (g) | 1435 (±384) | 1130 (±347) | 916 (±278) | 992 (±404) |
| Male | 131 (57.5%) | 44 (49.4%) | 42 (52.5%) | 69 (50.4%) |
| Multiple birth | 48 (21.1%) | 27 (30.0%) | 29 (36.3%) | 35 (25.6%) |
| White ethnicity | 209 (92.1%) | 80 (90.9%) | – | 44 (81.5%) |
| Apgar score | ||||
| 1 min | 6.3 (±2.2) | 6.2 (±2.1) | 5.7 (±2.1) | 6.3 (±2.1) |
| 5 min | 8.5 (±1.6) | 8.4 (±1.5) | 7.6 (±2.1) | 8.4 (±1.4) |
| Cerebral palsy | 19 (8.3%) | 12 (14.0%) | – | 10 (8.4%) |
| Cystic PVL | 18 (8.1%) | 6 (6.9%) | 7 (8.6%) | 6 (4.4%) |
| Low developmental score | 16 (8.0%) | 9 (10.2%) | – | 17 (16.4%) |
Pyrosequencing primers and reaction conditions used in the study
| Oligonucleotide | Sequence 5′-3′ | Product (bp) | Annealing T (°C) | Modifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAAT2PyroF-BIO | GGGGCTAAACCTTGCAATC | 166 | 60 | 5′ Biotin |
| EAAT2PyroSeq | GGGTGTGTGCGCGCC | N/A | None | |
| Target sequence for pyrosequencing |
| |||
| Nucleotide dispensation order |
| |||
Primer pair EAAT2PyroF-BIO/EAAT2PyroR were used to generate biotinylated PCR products flanking SNPs g.-200C>A and g.-181A>C. Primer EAAT2PyroSeq was used for pyrosequencing. The target sequence and the order of nucleotide dispensation for the pyrosequencing assay are listed. In the dispensation order the nucleotides used as negative controls are underlined. In optimal pyrosequencing conditions, these nucleotides are not incorporated into the target DNA sequence and therefore their addition do not generate peaks on the pyrogram (Fig. 1). The nucleotide change in the target sequence for pyrosequencing is indicated in bold
N/A not available
Fig. 1Pyrograms of the EAAT2 promoter SNPs. The position of the SNPs is highlighted in yellow boxes, the x-axis of each pyrogram indicates the order of reagent addition (E-enzyme, S-substrate and nucleotide A, G, T or C); the y-axis shows the light intensity generated. The numbering of pyrograms corresponds to the genotype numbers in Table 2. Due to the high GC content of the target sequence and the four C repeats before the SNP at position -181 bp, the pyrosequencing was carried out on the reverse strand. Thus, note that the sequence is in reverse orientation
Summary neurodevelopmental scores and standardised assessment used. Results are median (interquartile range-IQR). The standardised neurodevelopmental assessment scales used were: Griffith Mental Developmental Scale [30], Bayley Scales of infant development 2nd edition (BSID-II) [31] and 3rd edition (BSID-III) [32]. (For details, see the “Materials and Methods” section)
| Developmental assessment used | Median (IQR) | ‘Low developmental score’—10th percentile cut-off |
|---|---|---|
| APIP | ||
| Griffith Mental Developmental Scale | 96 (90–105) | <82 |
| Gloucestershire Royal Hospital | ||
| Griffith Mental Developmental Scale | 101 (90–111) | <64 |
| St Michael’s Hospital | ||
| BSID-II-Mental Developmental Index | 94 (70–108) | <51 |
| BSID-II-Psychomotor Developmental Index | 87 (71–100) | <53 |
| BSID-III-Cognitive Developmental Index | 100 (85–110) | <76 |
| BSID-III-Language Developmental Index | 96 (85–103) | <76 |
| BSID-III-Psychomotor Developmental Index | 96 (89–107) | <84 |
Distribution of genotypes in the sample cohort. Genotypes were identified by pyrosequencing and confirmed by Sanger sequencing (n = 51)
| Genotype Genotype | -200C>A | -181A>C | Number and proportion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C/C | A/A | 95 (20.2%) |
| 2 | C/A | A/C | 261 (55.4%) |
| 3 | A/A | C/C | 63 (13.4%) |
| 4 | C/A | A/A | 9 (1.9%) |
| 5 | A/A | A/A | 2 (0.4%) |
| 6 | C/C | A/C | 19 (4.0%) |
| 7 | A/A | A/C | 8 (1.7%) |
| 8 | C/C | C/C | 1 (0.2%) |
| 9 | C/A | C/C | 13 (2.8%) |
| Allele frequency | C = 0.56 | A = 0.53 |
|
Fig. 2Promoter activity of EAAT2. Astrocytes were transiently transfected with sequences corresponding to genotype 1 (-200 C/C; -181 A/A) and 3 (-200 A/A; -181 C/C) reporter constructs. Firefly and R. reniformis luciferase activities were measured as detailed in the “Materials and Methods” section and the relative firefly/Renilla luciferase values are shown. Bars represent relative luciferase values from three independent experiments with standard deviation
Intrapartum/perinatal characteristics of the cohort
| Perinatal measure |
| -200C>A | -181A>C |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | AC | AA | AA | AC | CC | |||
| Gestation (week) | 466 | 28.5 (±2.3) | 28.4 (±2.4) | 29.0 (±2.3) | 28.6 (±2.4) | 28.4 (±2.3) | 28.7 (±2.5) | 0.673 |
| Birth weight (g) | 466 | 1217 (±402) | 1182 (±437) | 1267 (±466) | 1218 (±403) | 1185 (±438) | 1254 (±462) | 0.690 |
| Male | 465 | 63 (56.8%) | 147 (52.7%) | 40 (54.8%) | 59 (56.2%) | 149 (52.7%) | 42 (54.6%) | 0.525 |
| Multiple birth | 466 | 28 (24.6%) | 68 (24.4%) | 22 (30.1%) | 24 (22.9%) | 75 (26.4%) | 19 (24.7%) | 0.268 |
| White ethnicity | 333 | 78 (91.8%) | 183 (90.2%) | 40 (88.9%) | 77 (93.9%) | 180 (90.5%) | 44 (84.6%) | <0.001 |
| Apgar score | ||||||||
| 1 min | 452 | 6.1 (±1.9) | 6.3 (±2.2) | 6.1 (±2.1) | 6.1 (±2.0) | 6.3 (±2.1) | 6.0 (±2.2) | 0.526 |
| 5 min | 451 | 8.3 (±1.5) | 8.3 (±1.7) | 8.3 (±1.6) | 8.3 (±1.5) | 8.4 (±1.6) | 8.2 (±1.7) | 0.769 |
n-number of infants with data available. Values are numbers with % or means ± standard deviation, as appropriate
Univariable associations between genotype and outcome measures
| Outcome measure |
| Homozygote | Heterozygote | Homozygote |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -200C>A | CC | AC | AA | ||
| Cerebral palsya | 385 | 9 (9.6%) | 23 (9.7%) | 3 (5.6%) | 0.621 |
| Cystic PVL | 458 | 7 (6.3%) | 21 (7.6%) | 3 (4.2%) | 0.566 |
| Low developmental scorea | 349 | 7 (7.7%) | 26 (12.4%) | 3 (6.3%) | 0.286 |
| -181A>C | AA | AC | CC | ||
| Cerebral palsya | 385 | 10 (11.4%) | 23 (9.5%) | 2 (3.9%) | 0.263 |
| Cystic PVL | 458 | 7 (6.7%) | 20 (7.3%) | 4 (5.2%) | 0.817 |
| Low developmental scorea | 349 | 11 (12.9%) | 22 (10.3%) | 3 (5.9%) | 0.424 |
n-number of infants with data available. Values are numbers with %
aCerebral palsy and low developmental score data were only available from three cohorts (for details, see Table 1)
Multi-level regression analysis for presence of each increasing -200 or -181 A allele and outcomes
| Outcome measure | Unadjusted (1) | Adjusted (2) | Adjusted (3) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
|
| OR (95% CI) |
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| -200C>A | |||||||||
| Cerebral palsy | 385 | 1.70 (0.62–4.66) | 0.299 | 365 | 1.68 (0.57–4.94) | 0.346 | 314 | 4.34 (1.12–16.77) | 0.033 |
| Cystic PVL | 458 | 0.88 (0.30–2.58) | 0.812 | 444 | 0.82 (0.26–2.60) | 0.740 | 317 | 0.68 (0.13–3.50) | 0.641 |
| Low developmental score | 349 | 3.73 (1.29–10.80) | 0.015 | 329 | 3.23 (1.04–10.02) | 0.042 | 282 | 2.84 (0.71–11.44) | 0.142 |
| -181A>C | |||||||||
| Cerebral palsy | 385 | 2.44 (0.87–6.79) | 0.089 | 365 | 2.72 (0.90–8.22) | 0.083 | 314 | 6.64 (1.76–25.07) | 0.005 |
| Cystic PVL | 458 | 1.00 (0.32–3.13) | 0.812 | 444 | 0.99 (0.31–3.10) | 0.980 | 317 | 0.88 (0.18–4.31) | 0.870 |
| Low developmental score | 349 | 4.56 (1.53–13.60) | 0.007 | 329 | 3.93 (1.23–12.57) | 0.013 | 282 | 4.15 (1.05–16.38) | 0.042 |
(1) Multi-level for neonatal unit of care and developmental tool used. (2) Adjusted for gender, birth weight, gestation and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. (3) Additionally adjusted for ethnicity. n—number of infants with data available. Values are odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
EAAT2 genotypes and outcomes
| Genotype | Low developmental score | Cerebral palsy | Low developmental score OR cerebral palsy | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A alleles | Genotype | SNP | SNP | Number with outcomes | % | Number with outcomes | % | Number with at least one outcome | % |
| 0 | 8 | C/C | C/C | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| 1 | 9 | C/A | C/C | 10 | 1 (10.0%) | 10 | 0 (0.0%) | 10 | 1 (10.0%) |
| 1 | 6 | C/C | A/C | 14 | 0 (0.0%) | 16 | 1 (6.3%) | 16 | 1 (6.3%) |
| 2 | 3 | A/A | C/C | 41 | 2 (4.9%) | 46 | 2 (4.4%) | 46 | 4 (8.7%) |
| 2 | 2 | C/A | A/C | 192 | 21 (10.9%) | 218 | 21 (9.6%) | 220 | 32 (14.6%) |
| 2 | 1 | C/C | A/A | 77 | 7 (9.1%) | 78 | 8 (10.3%) | 80 | 10 (12.5%) |
| 3 | 7 | A/A | A/C | 7 | 1 (14.3%) | 7 | 1 (14.3%) | 7 | 2 (28.6%) |
| 3 | 4 | C/A | A/A | 8 | 4 (50.0%) | 9 | 2 (22.2%) | 9 | 4 (44.4%) |
| 4 | 5 | A/A | A/A | 0 | – | 1 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 0 (0.0%) |
Fig. 3Proposed model of the SNPs impact on EAAT2 gene regulation. a EAAT2 promoter contains a consensus binding site for transcription factor activating enhancer binding protein 2 (AP-2), which is an activator of transcription in the developing brain [53]. b Nucleotide change from A to C at -181 bp abolishes this AP-2 consensus sequence and creates a binding site for transcription factor GC-binding factor 2 (GCF2) which represses EAAT2 gene expression [19]. c, d EAAT2 promoter is not only controlled by the transcriptional machinery, but is also subject to modulation by epigenetic mechanism such as DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides that inhibits gene expression [38, 39, 41, 42]. DNA methylation is reversible and subject to dynamic regulation throughout embryogenesis. Nucleotide changes from C to A might interfere with the normal DNA methylation process of EAAT2 at both -200 and -181 bp, affecting gene expression. The ability to downregulate EAAT2 in the developing brain seems beneficial since infants with three C alleles have better outcomes than those with only one