Literature DB >> 27591346

Temporal and Regional Variations in Operative Vaginal Delivery in Canada by Pelvic Station, 2004-2012.

Giulia M Muraca1, Yasser Sabr2, Rollin Brant3, Geoffrey W Cundiff4, K S Joseph1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe temporal and regional variations in Canada in the use of operative vaginal delivery (OVD) at term for singleton pregnancies by pelvic station between 2004 and 2013.
METHODS: Rates of OVD among term singleton pregnancies in Canada (excluding Quebec) were estimated using information from the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information for the years 2004-2012 (n = 2 284 109). Deliveries were stratified by pelvic station. Temporal trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test for linear trend in proportions by year. Geographic variation was assessed by calculating the rate and 95% confidence interval of each mode of delivery from 2010-2012 for each province and territory.
RESULTS: Among singleton pregnancies at term, the OVD rate decreased from 12.0% in 2004 to 10.7% in 2012 (P < 0.001), whereas Caesarean section rates (excluding those following failed OVDs) increased from 24.9% to 26.7%. Forceps deliveries decreased from 3.1% to 2.5%, primarily due to decreases in midpelvic forceps delivery. Vacuum-assisted delivery increased significantly at outlet and low stations (by 26.0% and 15.1%, respectively) and remained stable at midpelvic station. The failed OVD rate was 0.3% and decreased by 23.7% (P < 0.001). There were large variations in OVD rates by province.
CONCLUSION: Temporal trends in OVD rates varied by pelvic station, with rates of outlet and low OVD increasing and rates of midpelvic and failed OVD decreasing. Vacuum extraction is increasingly replacing forceps deliveries at outlet and low stations, whereas Caesarean sections are replacing forceps deliveries at midpelvic stations. Variations in OVD rates across provinces suggest differences in instrument preference and/or an evolution in standards of practice.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Operative vaginal delivery; caesarean section; forceps delivery; instrumental vaginal delivery; vacuum extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591346     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  8 in total

1.  An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  D A Crosby; A Sarangapani; A Simpson; R Windrim; A Satkunaratnam; M F Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Yasser Sabr; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Shiliang Liu; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Olof Stephansson; Neda Razaz; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A Prospective, Population-Based Study of Trends in Operative Vaginal Delivery Compared to Cesarean Delivery Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Sarah Saleem; Sumera Ali; Omrana Pasha; Elwyn Chomba; Waldemar A Carlo; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Shivaprasad S Goudar; S M Dhaded; Bhala Kodkany; Richard J Derman; Archana Patel; Patricia L Hibberd; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Antoinette Tshefu; Adrien Lokangaka; Melissa Bauserman; Carl L Bose; Fernando Althabe; Jose M Belizan; Pierre Buekens; Janet L Moore; Dennis D Wallace; Menachem Miodovnik; Marion Koso-Thomas; Elizabeth M McClure; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Temporal trends in severe maternal and neonatal trauma during childbirth: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Qi Wen; Giulia M Muraca; Joseph Ting; Sarah Coad; Kenneth I Lim; Sarka Lisonkova
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery.

Authors:  G M Muraca; A Skoll; S Lisonkova; Y Sabr; R Brant; G W Cundiff; K S Joseph
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Amélie Boutin; Neda Razaz; Sarka Lisonkova; Sid John; Joseph Y Ting; Heather Scott; Michael S Kramer; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.