Literature DB >> 21470764

Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.

J Unterscheider1, M McMenamin, F Cullinane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To audit caesarean sections performed at full cervical dilatation over a three year period in a tertiary referral centre in Ireland. To evaluate (i) the rate of caesarean deliveries in the second stage of labour, (ii) the indication for delivery and (iii) the associated fetal and maternal morbidity in this cohort of women. STUDY
DESIGN: This cohort study was carried out in the University Hospital Galway (UHG). Medical records of 136 consecutive women with singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, identified from the hospital database, who underwent a second stage caesarean section (CS) between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008, were reviewed retrospectively and demographic and outcome data were collected.
RESULTS: During the study period 2801/10,202 (27.5%) babies were delivered by CS. One hundred and thirty six CS (4.8%) were performed at full dilatation. The rate of CS during the second stage increased from 0.9% in 2006 to 1.8% in 2008. The majority of women were nulliparous (76.5%) and in spontaneous labour (64%). 44.1% of women had a second stage CS without a trial of instrumental delivery. 41.3% of public deliveries were attended by a consultant. The majority of babies (54%) were delivered because of a prolonged second stage with a mean duration of 146 min from full dilatation to delivery. Twenty-four of 59 primiparous women (40.7%), who underwent CS because of a prolonged second stage, did not receive oxytocin. 13.2% of babies were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Estimated blood loss was documented in 67% of cases (n=91); 14.3% of women (n=13) had a postpartum haemorrhage greater than or equal to 1000 mls. 23% of these women (n=3) required a blood transfusion. The overall blood transfusion rate was 2.2%. 50% of women had a hospital stay of greater than four days.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a worrying rise in the overall rate of CS at full dilatation. Audit of the second stage CS rate is a useful measure of clinical standards. Strategies for improved care include increased consultant presence, meticulous documentation and ongoing training of junior obstetric staff to ensure safe intrapartum care. CONDENSATION: The increase of second stage caesarean sections requires urgent strategies for improved care including increased consultant presence, meticulous documentation and training of junior obstetric staff.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470764     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  11 in total

1.  An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  D A Crosby; A Sarangapani; A Simpson; R Windrim; A Satkunaratnam; M F Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Abigail R Aiken; Catherine E Aiken; Medhat S Alberry; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London.

Authors:  Sian McDonnell; Edwin Chandraharan
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-05-11

5.  Late-stage Cesarean section causes recurrent early preterm birth: how to tackle this problem?

Authors:  A Glazewska-Hallin; L Story; N Suff; A Shennan
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  The acceptability to women of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section and of randomised trials evaluating those techniques: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gabriella Romano; Eleanor Mitchell; Rachel Plachcinski; Natalie Wakefield; Kate Walker; Susan Ayers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Developmental Immunotoxicity, Perinatal Programming, and Noncommunicable Diseases: Focus on Human Studies.

Authors:  Rodney R Dietert
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  Reporting errors, incidence and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage and progression to severe PPH: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A Briley; P T Seed; G Tydeman; H Ballard; M Waterstone; J Sandall; L Poston; R M Tribe; S Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Babies in occiput posterior position are significantly more likely to require an emergency cesarean birth compared with babies in occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nicola Tempest; Steven Lane; Dharani Hapangama
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Perinatal outcomes of babies delivered by second-stage Caesarean section versus vacuum extraction in a resource-poor setting, Nigeria - a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Paul Eze; Lucky Osaheni Lawani; Raphael Ugochukwu Chikezie; Chukwuemeka Ikechi Ukaegbe; Chukwuemeka Anthony Iyoke
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.