| Literature DB >> 28271077 |
Olfa Khalifa1, Nathalie Balandraud2, Nathalie Lambert3, Isabelle Auger3, Jean Roudier2, Audrey Sénéchal4, David Geneviève5, Christophe Picard6, Gérard Lefranc7, Isabelle Touitou8, Bakridine M'Madi Mrenda9, Cécilia Benedito9, Etienne Pardoux9, Anne-Laure Gagez10, Yves-Marie Pers11, Christian Jorgensen11, Touhami Mahjoub12, Florence Apparailly11.
Abstract
Polymorphisms have been identified in the Xq28 locus as risk loci for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we investigated the association between three polymorphisms in the Xq28 region containing TMEM187 and IRAK1 (rs13397, rs1059703, and rs1059702) in two unstudied populations: Tunisian and French. The rs13397 G and rs1059703 T major alleles were significantly increased in RA patients (n = 408) compared with age-matched controls (n = 471) in both Tunisian and French women. These results were confirmed by a meta-analysis replication study including two independent Greek and Korean cohorts. The rs1059702 C major allele was significantly associated with RA, only with French women. In the French population, the GTC haplotype displayed a protective effect against RA, while the ATC, GCC, and GTT haplotypes conferred significant risk for RA. No association for these haplotypes was found in the Tunisian population. Our results replicated for the first time the association of the three Xq28 polymorphisms with RA risk in Tunisian and French populations and suggested that RA susceptibility is associated with TMEM187-IRAK1 polymorphisms in women. Our data further support the involvement of X chromosome in RA susceptibility and evidence ethnicities differences that might be explained by differences in the frequencies of SE HLA-DRB1 alleles between both populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28271077 PMCID: PMC5320318 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4915950
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Characteristics of female samples from Tunisian and French cohort.
| Characteristic | Tunisian population | French population | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | RA patients | Controls | RA patients | |
| Size of the cohort | 131 | 119 | 340 | 289 |
| Age | 56.65 ± 17.37 | 52.16 ± 13.61 | 46.24 ± 8.92 | 63.15 ± 20.71 |
| Disease duration (years) | NA | 15.3 ± 5.6 | NA | 14.8 ± 6.9 |
| Positive ACPA, | NA | 119 (100) | NA | 289 (100) |
| Positive RF, | NA | 98 (74.7) | NA | 200 (69.20) |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | NA | 12.2 ± 22.7 | NA | 13.6 ± 21.8 |
| DAS28 | NA | 6.3 ± 1.2 | NA | 5.2 ± 1.4 |
| Smoking status% | 66 | 55 | 76 | 47 |
Shared epitope frequency and HLA-DRB1 alleles frequency in Tunisian and French RA.
| Alleles HLA-DRB1 | Tunisian RA | Tunisian allele frequency (%) | French RA | French allele frequency (%) | OR [95% CI] |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
#DRB1 | 16 | 6.06 | 59 | 22.35 | 0.31 [0–0.51] | 1.6 | 35.2 |
| DRB1 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 [0–4.55] | 0.32 | NS |
| DRB1 | 42 | 15.91 | 15 | 5.68 | 4.17 [2.48–+∞] | 1 | 22 |
|
#DRB1 | 11 | 4.17 | 48 | 18.18 | 0.26 [0–0.47] | 1.5 | 33 |
| DRB1 | 1 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.38 | 1.31 [0.20–+∞] | 0.39 | NS |
| DRB1 | 3 | 1.14 | 4 | 1.52 | 0.98 [0–3.23] | 0.51 | NS |
|
#DRB1 | 8 | 3.03 | 30 | 11.36 | 0.32 [0–0.64] | 0.001 | 0.0022 |
|
#DRB1 | 19 | 7.20 | 12 | 4.55 | 2.15 [1.16–+∞] | 0.01 | NS |
| DRB1 | 6 | 2.27 | 0 | 0.00 | +∞ [2.49–+∞] | 0.002 | 0.044 |
| DRB1 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 [0–4.56] | 0.32 | NS |
|
#DRB1 | 3 | 1.14 | 9 | 3.41 | 0.43 [0–1.27] | 0.11 | NS |
| DRB1 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 0.00 | +∞ [0.37–+∞] | 0.18 | NS |
| DRB1 | 41 | 15.53 | 46 | 17.42 | 1.19 [0.81–+∞] | 0.21 | NS |
| DRB1 | 3 | 1.14 | 1 | 0.38 | 3.96 [0.68–+∞] | 0.11 | NS |
| DRB1 | 1 | 0.38 | 2 | 0.76 | 0.65 [0–3.98] | 0.41 | NS |
|
#DRB1 | 33 | 12.50 | 13 | 4.92 | 3.65 [2.09–+∞] | 2.3 | 50.6 |
| DRB1 | 19 | 7.20 | 25 | 9.47 | 0.99 [0–1.66] | 0.5 | NS |
| DRB1 | 0 | 0.00 | 5 | 1.89 | 0 [0–0.83] | 0.03 | NS |
| DRB1 | 40 | 15.15 | 24 | 9.09 | 2.39 [1.52–+∞] | 0.0005 | 0.011 |
| DRB1 | 4 | 1.52 | 4 | 1.52 | 1.31 [0.43–+∞] | 0.33 | NS |
| DRB1 | 12 | 4.55 | 33 | 12.50 | 0.45 [0–0.80] | 0.009 | NS |
| DRB1 | 1 | 0.38 | 13 | 4.92 | 0.09 [0–0.49] | 0.002 | 0.044 |
#Shared epitope, XX means all known alleles, DRB114: XX apart from DRB114:02
p value corrected with Bonferroni correction.
NS: not significant.
TMEM187-IRAK1 genotypes for samples of RA and healthy controls in Tunisian and French female populations.
| Gene/SNPs | Population | Genotype | Controls | RA cases | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tunisian | GG | 92 (70) | 66 (53) | 0.48 (0.12–0.73) | 0.0025 |
| AG | 23 (18) | 46 (41) | ||||
| AA | 16 (12) | 7 (6) | ||||
| French | GG | 220 (65) | 131 (45) | 0.45 (0.21–0.59) | 1.0 | |
| AG | 97 (28) | 137 (47) | ||||
| AA | 23 (7) | 21 (8) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| Tunisian | CC | 15 (11) | 9 (7) | 0.46 (0.13–0.71) | 0.0017 |
| CT | 27 (21) | 51 (43) | ||||
| TT | 89 (68) | 59 (50) | ||||
| French | CC | 27 (8) | 34 (12) | 0.36 (0.15–0.47) | 1.0 | |
| CT | 85 (25) | 133 (46) | ||||
| TT | 228 (67) | 122 (42) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| Tunisian | CC | 81 (62) | 62 (52) | 0.67 (0.18–1.02) | 0.0608 |
| CT | 34 (26) | 43 (36) | ||||
| TT | 16 (12) | 14 (12) | ||||
| French | CC | 237 (70) | 157 (54) | 0.52 (0.24–0.68) | 3.7 | |
| CT | 83 (24) | 100 (35) | ||||
| TT | 20 (6) | 32 (11) | ||||
p values compared genotypes according to the dominant/recessive model.
Shared epitope single dose/double dose frequency in Tunisian and French RA women.
| Shared epitope (SE) | Tunisian RA | Tunisian SE frequency | French RA | French SE frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE single dose | 66 | 50.00 | 100 | 57.80 |
| SE double dose | 12 | 9.09 | 35 | 20.34 |
|
| ||||
| Total | 78 | 59.09 | 135 | 78.48 |
TMEM187-IRAK1 allelic frequencies in samples of RA and healthy controls from Tunisian and French female populations.
| Gene/SNPs | Populations | Alleles | Controls (%) | RA cases (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tunisian | G | 207 (79) | 178 (75) |
| A | 55 (21) | 60 (25) | ||
| French | G | 537 (79) | 399 (69) | |
| A | 143 (21) | 179 (31) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Tunisian | C | 57 (22) | 69 (29) |
| T | 205 (78) | 169 (71) | ||
| French | C | 139 (20) | 201 (35) | |
| T | 541 (80) | 377 (65) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Tunisian | C | 196 (75) | 167 (70) |
| T | 66 (25) | 71 (30) | ||
| French | C | 557 (82) | 414 (72) | |
| T | 123 (18) | 164 (28) | ||
Figure 1Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between TMEM187-IRAK1 SNPs. Correlations (r2 values) among all 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the TMEM187-IRAK1 locus are indicated in the diamonds for the Tunisian (a) and French (b) populations. Haploview 4.2 software was used for LD analyses.
Association of SNP haplotypes in the TMEM187-IRAK1 region with RA susceptibility.
| Chromosome | Populations | Haplotypes | Frequencies | OR (95%CI) |
| Effects | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | Cases | ||||||
| X | Tunisian | [ATC] | 0.15 | 0.15 | 1.00 (0.63–1.59) | 0.995 | NA |
| French | 0.09 | 0.19 | 3.97 (2.57–6.13) | <0.001 | Risk | ||
| Tunisian | [GCC] | 0.14 | 0.17 | 1.21 (0.79–1.89) | 0.379 | NA | |
| French | 0.06 | 0.15 | 2.39 (1.52–3.77) | <0.001 | Risk | ||
| Tunisian | [GTT] | 0.15 | 0.18 | 1.09 (0.70–1.71) | 0.692 | NA | |
| French | 0.04 | 0.10 | 2.05 (1.16–3.62) | 0.009 | Risk | ||
| Tunisian | [GTC] | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.77 (0.57–1.04) | 0.083 | NA | |
| French | 0.68 | 0.39 | 0.23 (0.16–0.33) | <0.001 | Protector | ||
Order of SNPs: [rs13397, rs1059703, rs1059702]
NA: no association.
Characteristics of all studies included in meta-analysis within the TMEM187-IRAK1 locus.
| Study | Population | Group | Subjects | Women's sex% | Average age in years | Genotype | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| GG | AG | AA | G | A | CC | CT | TT | C | T | CC | CT | TT | C | T | AA | AC | CC | A | C | ||||||
| This study | Tunisia | Case | 119 | 100% | 52.16 ± 13.61 | 66 | 46 | 7 | 178 | 60 | 9 | 51 | 59 | 69 | 169 | 62 | 43 | 14 | 167 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Control | 131 | 100% | 56.65 ± 17.37 | 92 | 23 | 16 | 207 | 55 | 15 | 27 | 89 | 57 | 205 | 81 | 34 | 16 | 196 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| This study | French | Case | 289 | 100% | 63.15 ± 20.71 | 131 | 137 | 21 | 399 | 179 | 34 | 133 | 122 | 201 | 377 | 157 | 100 | 32 | 414 | 164 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Control | 340 | 100% | 46.24 ± 8.92 | 220 | 97 | 23 | 537 | 143 | 27 | 85 | 228 | 139 | 541 | 237 | 83 | 20 | 557 | 123 | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| Chatzikyriakidou et al. (2010) | Greece | Case | 136 | 80% | 60.8 ± 12.7 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 52 | 77 | 66 | 206 | — | — | — | — | — | 71 | 45 | 20 | 187 | 85 |
| Control | 147 | 78% | 56.23 ± 5.13 | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 46 | 94 | 60 | 234 | — | — | — | — | — | 91 | 47 | 9 | 229 | 65 | ||
| Han et al. (2013) | Korea | Case | 1,318 | 100% | 51.8 ± 12.2 | — | — | — | — | — | 715 | 389 | 59 | 1819 | 507 | 62 | 393 | 707 | 517 | 1807 | 719 | 383 | 56 | 1821 | 495 |
| Control | 1,016 | 100% | 36.7 ± 12.5 | — | — | — | — | — | 468 | 337 | 52 | 1273 | 441 | 59 | 336 | 465 | 454 | 1266 | 478 | 321 | 50 | 1277 | 421 | ||
| Zhang et al. (2013) | China | Case | 214 | 71% | 54.63 (±15.77) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28 | 42 | 141 | 98 | 324 |
| Control | 478 | 71% | 54.84 (±10.45) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 337 | 103 | 35 | 173 | 777 | ||
Figure 2Forest plot of the association between TMEM187 rs13397 (a), IRAK1 rs1059703 (b), and IRAK1 rs1059702 (c) polymorphisms and RA. Meta-analyses were performed for the rs13397 (a), rs1059703 (b), and rs1059702 (c) polymorphisms, respectively, using Review Manager 5.3 software.