Pierce Boyne1, Sandra Billinger, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Brian Barney, Jane Khoury, Kari Dunning. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati (P.B., B.B., K.D.), Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati (P.B., J.K., K.D.), and Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (J.K.), Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (S.B.); and School of Physiotherapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada (M.M.-L.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Best practice recommendations indicate that aerobic exercise (AEX) should be incorporated into stroke rehabilitation. However, this may be challenging in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to assess physical therapist (PT) AEX prescription for patients with stroke, including AEX utilization, barriers to AEX prescription, dosing parameters, and safety considerations. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey study was conducted. Physical therapists with valid e-mail addresses on file with the state boards of Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, and Wyoming were eligible to participate. Survey invitations were e-mailed to all licensed PT in these states. Analysis focused on respondents who were currently involved with clinical stroke rehabilitation in common practice settings. RESULTS: Results from 568 respondents were analyzed. Most respondents (88%) agreed that AEX should be incorporated into stroke rehabilitation, but 84% perceived at least one barrier. Median prescribed AEX volume varied between practice settings from 20- to 30-minute AEX sessions, 3 to 5 days per week for 2 to 8 weeks. Prescribed intensity was most commonly light or moderate; intensity was determined by the general response to AEX and patient feedback. Only 2% of respondents reported that the majority of their patients with stroke had stress tests. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Most US PTs appear to recognize the importance of AEX for persons poststroke, but clinical implementation can be challenging. Future studies and consensus are needed to clarify best practices and to develop implementation interventions to optimize AEX utilization in stroke rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A167).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Best practice recommendations indicate that aerobic exercise (AEX) should be incorporated into stroke rehabilitation. However, this may be challenging in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to assess physical therapist (PT) AEX prescription for patients with stroke, including AEX utilization, barriers to AEX prescription, dosing parameters, and safety considerations. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey study was conducted. Physical therapists with valid e-mail addresses on file with the state boards of Florida, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, and Wyoming were eligible to participate. Survey invitations were e-mailed to all licensed PT in these states. Analysis focused on respondents who were currently involved with clinical stroke rehabilitation in common practice settings. RESULTS: Results from 568 respondents were analyzed. Most respondents (88%) agreed that AEX should be incorporated into stroke rehabilitation, but 84% perceived at least one barrier. Median prescribed AEX volume varied between practice settings from 20- to 30-minute AEX sessions, 3 to 5 days per week for 2 to 8 weeks. Prescribed intensity was most commonly light or moderate; intensity was determined by the general response to AEX and patient feedback. Only 2% of respondents reported that the majority of their patients with stroke had stress tests. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Most US PTs appear to recognize the importance of AEX for persons poststroke, but clinical implementation can be challenging. Future studies and consensus are needed to clarify best practices and to develop implementation interventions to optimize AEX utilization in stroke rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A167).
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Neil F Gordon; Meg Gulanick; Fernando Costa; Gerald Fletcher; Barry A Franklin; Elliot J Roth; Tim Shephard Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-04-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paul D Thompson; Barry A Franklin; Gary J Balady; Steven N Blair; Domenico Corrado; N A Mark Estes; Janet E Fulton; Neil F Gordon; William L Haskell; Mark S Link; Barry J Maron; Murray A Mittleman; Antonio Pelliccia; Nanette K Wenger; Stefan N Willich; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frederick M Ivey; Alice S Ryan; Charlene E Hafer-Macko; Andrew P Goldberg; Richard F Macko Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Barbara M Quaney; Lara A Boyd; Joan M McDowd; Laura H Zahner; Jianghua He; Matthew S Mayo; Richard F Macko Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; Amanda Penko; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Dermot Phelan; Jay L Alberts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Elizabeth W Regan; Reed Handlery; Jill C Stewart; Joseph L Pearson; Sara Wilcox; Stacy Fritz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Sandra A Billinger; Janice J Eng; Alex Dromerick; Nicholas Giacomantonio; Charlene Hafer-Macko; Richard Macko; Emily Nguyen; Peter Prior; Neville Suskin; Ada Tang; Marianne Thornton; Karen Unsworth Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-01-23
Authors: Susan M Linder; Sara Davidson; Anson Rosenfeldt; John Lee; Mandy Miller Koop; Francois Bethoux; Jay L Alberts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.966