BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous work demonstrates that older adults have a lower response in the middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) to an acute bout of moderate-intensity exercise when compared with young adults. However, no information exists regarding MCAv response to exercise after stroke. We tested whether MCAv response to an acute bout of moderate-intensity exercise differed between participants 3 months after stroke and an age- and sex-matched control group of older adults (CON). A secondary objective was to compare MCAv response between the stroke- and non-stroke-affected MCAv. METHODS: Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we recorded MCAv during a 90-second baseline (BL) followed by a 6-minute moderate-intensity exercise bout using a recumbent stepper. Heart rate (HR), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), and beat-to-beat mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were additional variables of interest. The MCAv response measures included BL, peak response amplitude (Amp), time delay (TD), and time constant (τ). RESULTS: The Amp was significantly lower in the stroke-affected MCAv compared with CON (P < 0.01) and in the nonaffected MCAv compared with CON (P = 0.03). No between-group differences were found between TD and τ. No significant differences were found during exercise for PETCO2 and MAP while HR was lower in participants with stroke (P < 0.01). Within the group of participants with stroke, no differences were found between the stroke-affected and non-stroke-affected sides for any measures. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of the dynamic response profile has the potential to increase our understanding of the cerebrovascular control mechanisms and test cerebrovascular response to physical therapy-driven interventions such as exercise.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A284).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous work demonstrates that older adults have a lower response in the middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) to an acute bout of moderate-intensity exercise when compared with young adults. However, no information exists regarding MCAv response to exercise after stroke. We tested whether MCAv response to an acute bout of moderate-intensity exercise differed between participants 3 months after stroke and an age- and sex-matched control group of older adults (CON). A secondary objective was to compare MCAv response between the stroke- and non-stroke-affected MCAv. METHODS: Using transcranial Doppler ultrasound, we recorded MCAv during a 90-second baseline (BL) followed by a 6-minute moderate-intensity exercise bout using a recumbent stepper. Heart rate (HR), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), and beat-to-beat mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were additional variables of interest. The MCAv response measures included BL, peak response amplitude (Amp), time delay (TD), and time constant (τ). RESULTS: The Amp was significantly lower in the stroke-affected MCAv compared with CON (P < 0.01) and in the nonaffected MCAv compared with CON (P = 0.03). No between-group differences were found between TD and τ. No significant differences were found during exercise for PETCO2 and MAP while HR was lower in participants with stroke (P < 0.01). Within the group of participants with stroke, no differences were found between the stroke-affected and non-stroke-affected sides for any measures. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of the dynamic response profile has the potential to increase our understanding of the cerebrovascular control mechanisms and test cerebrovascular response to physical therapy-driven interventions such as exercise.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A284).
Authors: R F Macko; C A DeSouza; L D Tretter; K H Silver; G V Smith; P A Anderson; N Tomoyasu; P Gorman; D R Dengel Journal: Stroke Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Alice S Ryan; C Lynne Dobrovolny; Gerald V Smith; Kenneth H Silver; Richard F Macko Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Sandra A Billinger; Jesse C Craig; Sarah J Kwapiszeski; Jason-Flor V Sisante; Eric D Vidoni; Rebecca Maletsky; David C Poole Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-03-09
Authors: Joel D Trinity; Gwenael Layec; Corey R Hart; Russell S Richardson Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Benjamin Y Tseng; Jinsoo Uh; Heidi C Rossetti; C Munro Cullum; Ramon F Diaz-Arrastia; Benjamin D Levine; Hanzhang Lu; Rong Zhang Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K R Marsden; M J Haykowsky; J D Smirl; H Jones; M D Nelson; Luis A Altamirano-Diaz; J C Gelinas; Y C Tzeng; K J Smith; C K Willie; D M Bailey; P N Ainslie Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2011-05-11
Authors: Alicen A Whitaker; Madison L Henry; Allegra Morton; Jaimie L Ward; Sarah M Eickmeyer; Michael G Abraham; Sandra A Billinger Journal: Cardiopulm Phys Ther J Date: 2022-03-25
Authors: Carolyn S Kaufman; Jill K Morris; Eric D Vidoni; Jeffrey M Burns; Sandra A Billinger Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2021 Jul-Sep 01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Sandra A Billinger; Alicen A Whitaker; Allegra Morton; Carolyn S Kaufman; Sophy J Perdomo; Jaimie L Ward; Sarah M Eickmeyer; Stephen X Bai; Luke Ledbetter; Michael G Abraham Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Christine M Tallon; Jack S Talbot; Kurt J Smith; Nia Lewis; Daniela Nowak-Flück; Mike Stembridge; Philip Ainslie; Ali M McManus Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-08
Authors: Allegra Morton; Moira Myers; Alicen A Whitaker; Katie S Kempf; Sarah M Eickmeyer; Michael Abraham; Michael A Rippee; Sandra A Billinger Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 4.655
Authors: Carolyn S Kaufman; Eric D Vidoni; Jeffrey M Burns; Mohammed R Alwatban; Sandra A Billinger Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Alicen A Whitaker; Mohammed Alwatban; Andrea Freemyer; Jaime Perales-Puchalt; Sandra A Billinger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240