BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits impede stroke recovery. Aerobic exercise (AEX) improves cognitive executive function (EF) processes in healthy individuals, although the learning benefits after stroke are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To understand AEX-induced improvements in EF, motor learning, and mobility poststroke. METHODS: Following cardiorespiratory testing, 38 chronic stroke survivors were randomized to 2 different groups that exercised 3 times a week (45-minute sessions) for 8 weeks. The AEX group (n = 19; 9 women; 10 men; 64.10 +/- 12.30 years) performed progressive resistive stationary bicycle training at 70% maximal heart rate, whereas the Stretching Exercise (SE) group (n = 19; 12 women; 7 men; 58.96 +/- 14.68 years) performed stretches at home. Between-group comparisons were performed on the change in performance at "Post" and "Retention" (8 weeks later) for neuropsychological and motor function measures. RESULTS:VO(2)max significantly improved at Post with AEX (P = .04). AEX also improved motor learning in the less-affected hand, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d calculation). Specifically, AEX significantly improved information processing speed on the serial reaction time task (SRTT; ie, "procedural motor learning") compared with the SE group at Post (P = .024), but not at Retention. Also, at Post (P = .038), AEX significantly improved predictive force accuracy for a precision grip task requiring attention and conditional motor learning of visual cues. Ambulation and sit-to-stand transfers were significantly faster in the AEX group at Post (P = .038), with balance control significantly improved at Retention (P = .041). EF measurements were not significantly different for the AEX group. CONCLUSION: AEX improved mobility and selected cognitive domains related to motor learning, which enhances sensorimotor control after stroke.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cognitive deficits impede stroke recovery. Aerobic exercise (AEX) improves cognitive executive function (EF) processes in healthy individuals, although the learning benefits after stroke are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To understand AEX-induced improvements in EF, motor learning, and mobility poststroke. METHODS: Following cardiorespiratory testing, 38 chronic stroke survivors were randomized to 2 different groups that exercised 3 times a week (45-minute sessions) for 8 weeks. The AEX group (n = 19; 9 women; 10 men; 64.10 +/- 12.30 years) performed progressive resistive stationary bicycle training at 70% maximal heart rate, whereas the Stretching Exercise (SE) group (n = 19; 12 women; 7 men; 58.96 +/- 14.68 years) performed stretches at home. Between-group comparisons were performed on the change in performance at "Post" and "Retention" (8 weeks later) for neuropsychological and motor function measures. RESULTS: VO(2)max significantly improved at Post with AEX (P = .04). AEX also improved motor learning in the less-affected hand, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d calculation). Specifically, AEX significantly improved information processing speed on the serial reaction time task (SRTT; ie, "procedural motor learning") compared with the SE group at Post (P = .024), but not at Retention. Also, at Post (P = .038), AEX significantly improved predictive force accuracy for a precision grip task requiring attention and conditional motor learning of visual cues. Ambulation and sit-to-stand transfers were significantly faster in the AEX group at Post (P = .038), with balance control significantly improved at Retention (P = .041). EF measurements were not significantly different for the AEX group. CONCLUSION: AEX improved mobility and selected cognitive domains related to motor learning, which enhances sensorimotor control after stroke.
Authors: A F Kramer; S Hahn; N J Cohen; M T Banich; E McAuley; C R Harrison; J Chason; E Vakil; L Bardell; R A Boileau; A Colcombe Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Judith M Lam; Christoph Globas; Joachim Cerny; Benjamin Hertler; Kamil Uludag; Larry W Forrester; Richard F Macko; Daniel F Hanley; Clemens Becker; Andreas R Luft Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.919