Babar A Khan1, Anthony J Perkins, Sujuan Gao, Siu L Hui, Noll L Campbell, Mark O Farber, Linda L Chlan, Malaz A Boustani. 1. 1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 2Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN. 3Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN. 4Indiana University Center for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indianapolis, IN. 5Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, IN. 6Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN. 7Nursing Research Division, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Delirium severity is independently associated with longer hospital stays, nursing home placement, and death in patients outside the ICU. Delirium severity in the ICU is not routinely measured because the available instruments are difficult to complete in critically ill patients. We designed our study to assess the reliability and validity of a new ICU delirium severity tool, the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 delirium severity scale. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and progressive ICUs of three academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Five hundred eighteen adult (≥ 18 yr) patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients received the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 assessments. A 7-point scale (0-7) was derived from responses to the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale items. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and good correlation with Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 scores (correlation coefficient = 0.64). Known-groups validity was supported by the separation of mechanically ventilated and nonventilated assessments. Median Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores demonstrated good predictive validity with higher odds (odds ratio = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.30-1.66) of in-hospital mortality and lower odds (odds ratio = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.72-0.9) of being discharged home after adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, and chronic comorbidities. Higher Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores were also associated with increased length of ICU stay (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 is a valid and reliable delirium severity measure among ICU patients. Further research comparing it to other delirium severity measures, its use in delirium efficacy trials, and real-life implementation is needed to determine its role in research and clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES:Delirium severity is independently associated with longer hospital stays, nursing home placement, and death in patients outside the ICU. Delirium severity in the ICU is not routinely measured because the available instruments are difficult to complete in critically illpatients. We designed our study to assess the reliability and validity of a new ICU delirium severity tool, the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 delirium severity scale. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and progressive ICUs of three academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Five hundred eighteen adult (≥ 18 yr) patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Patients received the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 assessments. A 7-point scale (0-7) was derived from responses to the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale items. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and good correlation with Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 scores (correlation coefficient = 0.64). Known-groups validity was supported by the separation of mechanically ventilated and nonventilated assessments. Median Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores demonstrated good predictive validity with higher odds (odds ratio = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.30-1.66) of in-hospital mortality and lower odds (odds ratio = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.72-0.9) of being discharged home after adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, and chronic comorbidities. Higher Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores were also associated with increased length of ICU stay (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 is a valid and reliable delirium severity measure among ICU patients. Further research comparing it to other delirium severity measures, its use in delirium efficacy trials, and real-life implementation is needed to determine its role in research and clinical practice.
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E Wesley Ely; Ayumi Shintani; Brenda Truman; Theodore Speroff; Sharon M Gordon; Frank E Harrell; Sharon K Inouye; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: E W Ely; S Gautam; R Margolin; J Francis; L May; T Speroff; B Truman; R Dittus; R Bernard; S K Inouye Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Richard N Jones; Sevdenur Cizginer; Laura Pavlech; Asha Albuquerque; Lori A Daiello; Kumar Dharmarajan; Lauren J Gleason; Benjamin Helfand; Lauren Massimo; Esther Oh; Olivia I Okereke; Patricia Tabloski; Laura A Rabin; Jirong Yue; Edward R Marcantonio; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Eran D Metzger; Kristen Erickson; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Babar A Khan; Anthony J Perkins; Nagendra K Prasad; Anantha Shekhar; Noll L Campbell; Sujuan Gao; Sophia Wang; Sikandar H Khan; Edward R Marcantonio; Homer L Twigg; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Heidi Lindroth; Babar A Khan; Janet S Carpenter; Sujuan Gao; Anthony J Perkins; Sikandar H Khan; Sophia Wang; Richard N Jones; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-09
Authors: Christina S Boncyk; Kimberly F Rengel; Pratik P Pandharipande; Christopher G Hughes Journal: Curr Opin Crit Care Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.687
Authors: Heidi Lindroth; Lisa Bratzke; Sara Twadell; Paul Rowley; Janie Kildow; Mara Danner; Lily Turner; Brandon Hernandez; Roger Brown; Robert D Sanders Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Babar A Khan; Anthony J Perkins; Noll L Campbell; Sujuan Gao; Mark O Farber; Sophia Wang; Sikandar H Khan; Ben L Zarzaur; Malaz A Boustani Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sikandar H Khan; Chenjia Xu; Russell Purpura; Sana Durrani; Heidi Lindroth; Sophia Wang; Sujuan Gao; Annie Heiderscheit; Linda Chlan; Malaz Boustani; Babar A Khan Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 2.228