Babar A Khan1,2,3, Anthony J Perkins1, Noll L Campbell1,2,3,4,5, Sujuan Gao1, Mark O Farber1, Sophia Wang1,6, Sikandar H Khan1, Ben L Zarzaur1,7, Malaz A Boustani1,2,3,4. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 2. Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, Indiana. 3. Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana. 4. Sandra Eskenazi Center for Brain Care Innovation at Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, Indiana. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. 7. Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Delirium in the intensive care units (ICUs) is prevalent, with both delirium duration and delirium severity associated with adverse outcomes. We designed a pragmatic trial to test the efficacy of a pharmacological management of delirium (PMD) bundle in improving delirium/coma-free days and reducing delirium severity among ICU patients. DESIGN: A randomized pragmatic clinical trial. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and progressive ICUs of three tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 351 critically ill patients. INTERVENTION: A multicomponent PMD bundle consisting of reducing the exposure to 20 definite anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines and prescribing low-dose haloperidol. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were delirium/coma-free days, measured through the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), and delirium severity, measured through Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 and the CAM-ICU-7. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and posthospital discharge 30-day mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and delirium-related hospital complications. RESULTS: We randomized 351 critically ill delirious patients (mean age = 59.3 years [SD = 16.9 years]; 52% female, 42% African Americans) to receive the PMD bundle or usual care. There were no significant differences in median delirium/coma-free days at day 8 (PMD vs usual care = 4 [interquartile range {IQR} = 2-7] days vs 5 [IQR = 1-7] days; P = .888) or at day 30 (PMD vs usual care = 26 [IQR 19-29] days vs 26 [IQR, 14-29] days; P = .991). There were no significant differences for decrease in delirium severity at day 8, but at hospital discharge, the intervention group showed a greater reduction in delirium severity (mean decrease in CAM-ICU-7 score for PMD vs usual care = 3.2 [SD = 3.3] vs 2.5 [SD = 3.2]; P = .046). No differences were observed between groups for ICU and hospital lengths of stay, mortality, and delirium-related hospital complications. Similar results were observed when analyses were limited to patients 65 years or older and 75 years or older. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Implementing the PMD bundle in the ICU did not reduce delirium duration or severity among critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00842608. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1057-1065, 2019.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE:Delirium in the intensive care units (ICUs) is prevalent, with both delirium duration and delirium severity associated with adverse outcomes. We designed a pragmatic trial to test the efficacy of a pharmacological management of delirium (PMD) bundle in improving delirium/coma-free days and reducing delirium severity among ICU patients. DESIGN: A randomized pragmatic clinical trial. SETTING: Medical, surgical, and progressive ICUs of three tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 351 critically illpatients. INTERVENTION: A multicomponent PMD bundle consisting of reducing the exposure to 20 definite anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines and prescribing low-dose haloperidol. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were delirium/coma-free days, measured through the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU), and delirium severity, measured through Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 and the CAM-ICU-7. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and posthospital discharge 30-day mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and delirium-related hospital complications. RESULTS: We randomized 351 critically ill deliriouspatients (mean age = 59.3 years [SD = 16.9 years]; 52% female, 42% African Americans) to receive the PMD bundle or usual care. There were no significant differences in median delirium/coma-free days at day 8 (PMD vs usual care = 4 [interquartile range {IQR} = 2-7] days vs 5 [IQR = 1-7] days; P = .888) or at day 30 (PMD vs usual care = 26 [IQR 19-29] days vs 26 [IQR, 14-29] days; P = .991). There were no significant differences for decrease in delirium severity at day 8, but at hospital discharge, the intervention group showed a greater reduction in delirium severity (mean decrease in CAM-ICU-7 score for PMD vs usual care = 3.2 [SD = 3.3] vs 2.5 [SD = 3.2]; P = .046). No differences were observed between groups for ICU and hospital lengths of stay, mortality, and delirium-related hospital complications. Similar results were observed when analyses were limited to patients 65 years or older and 75 years or older. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Implementing the PMD bundle in the ICU did not reduce delirium duration or severity among critically illpatients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00842608. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1057-1065, 2019.
Authors: E W Ely; S K Inouye; G R Bernard; S Gordon; J Francis; L May; B Truman; T Speroff; S Gautam; R Margolin; R P Hart; R Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Curtis N Sessler; Mark S Gosnell; Mary Jo Grap; Gretchen M Brophy; Pam V O'Neal; Kimberly A Keane; Eljim P Tesoro; R K Elswick Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Eric B Milbrandt; Stephen Deppen; Patricia L Harrison; Ayumi K Shintani; Theodore Speroff; Renée A Stiles; Brenda Truman; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: E W Ely; S Gautam; R Margolin; J Francis; L May; T Speroff; B Truman; R Dittus; R Bernard; S K Inouye Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Babar A Khan; Anthony J Perkins; Nagendra K Prasad; Anantha Shekhar; Noll L Campbell; Sujuan Gao; Sophia Wang; Sikandar H Khan; Edward R Marcantonio; Homer L Twigg; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Heidi Lindroth; Babar A Khan; Janet S Carpenter; Sujuan Gao; Anthony J Perkins; Sikandar H Khan; Sophia Wang; Richard N Jones; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-09
Authors: Sikandar H Khan; Chenjia Xu; Russell Purpura; Sana Durrani; Heidi Lindroth; Sophia Wang; Sujuan Gao; Annie Heiderscheit; Linda Chlan; Malaz Boustani; Babar A Khan Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Lisa Burry; Brian Hutton; David R Williamson; Sangeeta Mehta; Neill Kj Adhikari; Wei Cheng; E Wesley Ely; Ingrid Egerod; Dean A Fergusson; Louise Rose Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-09-03
Authors: Noll L Campbell; Richard J Holden; Qing Tang; Malaz A Boustani; Evgenia Teal; Jennifer Hillstrom; Wanzhu Tu; Daniel O Clark; Christopher M Callahan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 7.538