Literature DB >> 21775787

Continuous electrical stimulation decreases retinal excitability but does not alter retinal morphology.

A Ray1, E-J Lee, M S Humayun, J D Weiland.   

Abstract

Retinal prostheses aim to provide visual perception through electrical stimulation of the retina. Hence they have to operate between threshold charge density and maximum safe charge density. To date most studies in the retina have concentrated on understanding the threshold, while stimulation safety has predominantly been studied in structures other than the retina. Toward this end, the present study focuses on determining the effect of continuous electrical stimulation of the retina both on retinal morphology and on the electrically evoked responses in the superior colliculus in a rodent model. The results demonstrate that the retina is able to tolerate 1 h long stimulation with only minor changes evident in retinal histology when examined three to 14 days later, even at charge densities (0.68 mC cm(-2)) above the safe limit of platinum delivered at high stimulus frequency (300 Hz). However, this continuous electrical stimulation causes an elevation in the threshold of the electrically evoked response in the superior colliculus, indicating some form of adaptation to continuous stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775787     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/045003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Retina with Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  A Gonzalez-Calle; J D Weiland
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Inner retinal preservation in rat models of retinal degeneration implanted with subretinal photovoltaic arrays.

Authors:  Jacob G Light; James W Fransen; Adewumi N Adekunle; Alice Adkins; Gobinda Pangeni; James Loudin; Keith Mathieson; Daniel V Palanker; Maureen A McCall; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.467

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.