Literature DB >> 28257886

Effects of Payment for Performance on accountability mechanisms: Evidence from Pwani, Tanzania.

Iddy Mayumana1, Jo Borghi2, Laura Anselmi3, Masuma Mamdani4, Siri Lange5.   

Abstract

Payment for Performance (P4P) aims to improve provider motivation to perform better, but little is known about the effects of P4P on accountability mechanisms. We examined the effect of P4P in Tanzania on internal and external accountability mechanisms. We carried out 93 individual in-depth interviews, 9 group interviews and 19 Focus Group Discussions in five intervention districts in three rounds of data collection between 2011 and 2013. We carried out surveys in 150 health facilities across Pwani region and four control districts, and interviewed 200 health workers, before the scheme was introduced and 13 months later. We examined the effects of P4P on internal accountability mechanisms including management changes, supervision, and priority setting, and external accountability mechanisms including provider responsiveness to patients, and engagement with Health Facility Governing Committees. P4P had some positive effects on internal accountability, with increased timeliness of supervision and the provision of feedback during supervision, but a lack of effect on supervision intensity. P4P reduced the interruption of service delivery due to broken equipment as well as drug stock-outs due to increased financial autonomy and responsiveness from managers. Management practices became less hierarchical, with less emphasis on bureaucratic procedures. Effects on external accountability were mixed, health workers treated pregnant women more kindly, but outreach activities did not increase. Facilities were more likely to have committees but their role was largely limited. P4P resulted in improvements in internal accountability measures through improved relations and communication between stakeholders that were incentivised at different levels of the system and enhanced provider autonomy over funds. P4P had more limited effects on external accountability, though attitudes towards patients appeared to improve, community engagement through health facility governing committees remained limited. Implementers should examine the lines of accountability when setting incentives and deciding who to incentivise in P4P schemes.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountability; P4P; PBF; Payment for performance; Performance-based financing; RBF; Results-based financing; Tanzania

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257886     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  15 in total

1.  Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Karin Diaconu; Jennifer Falconer; Adrian Verbel; Atle Fretheim; Sophie Witter
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-05

2.  Towards improved health service quality in Tanzania: An approach to increase efficiency and effectiveness of routine supportive supervision.

Authors:  Sabine Renggli; Iddy Mayumana; Dominick Mboya; Christopher Charles; Justin Maeda; Christopher Mshana; Flora Kessy; Fabrizio Tediosi; Constanze Pfeiffer; Alexander Schulze; Ann Aerts; Christian Lengeler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Understanding for whom, why and in what circumstances payment for performance works in low and middle income countries: protocol for a realist review.

Authors:  Josephine Borghi; Neha S Singh; Garrett Brown; Laura Anselmi; Soren Kristensen
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-06-27

4.  Health care purchasing in Kenya: Experiences of health care providers with capitation and fee-for-service provider payment mechanisms.

Authors:  Melvin Obadha; Jane Chuma; Jacob Kazungu; Edwine Barasa
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-11-13

5.  Implementing performance-based financing in peripheral health centres in Mali: what can we learn from it?

Authors:  Abdourahmane Coulibaly; Lara Gautier; Tony Zitti; Valéry Ridde
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-06-03

6.  Understanding efficiency and the effect of pay-for-performance across health facilities in Tanzania.

Authors:  Peter Binyaruka; Laura Anselmi
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-05

7.  Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania.

Authors:  Peter Binyaruka; Bjarne Robberstad; Gaute Torsvik; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-01-29

8.  Combining Theory-Driven Evaluation and Causal Loop Diagramming for Opening the 'Black Box' of an Intervention in the Health Sector: A Case of Performance-Based Financing in Western Uganda.

Authors:  Dimitri Renmans; Nathalie Holvoet; Bart Criel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Does payment for performance increase performance inequalities across health providers? A case study of Tanzania.

Authors:  Peter Binyaruka; Bjarne Robberstad; Gaute Torsvik; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 10.  What's Needed to Develop Strategic Purchasing in Healthcare? Policy Lessons from a Realist Review.

Authors:  Joe Sanderson; Chris Lonsdale; Russell Mannion
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.