| Literature DB >> 28257085 |
Pilar Navarro1, Olaya de Dios2, Asha Jois3, Teresa Gavela-Pérez4,5, Lydia Gorgojo6, José M Martín-Moreno7, Leandro Soriano-Guillen8,9, Carmen Garcés10.
Abstract
The influence of diet on inflammation in children remains unclear. We aimed to analyze the influence of diet on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in a pre-pubertal population free of other influences that may affect hs-CRP levels. We determined hs-CRP levels in 571 six- to eight-year-old children using an hs-CRP ELISA kit. Information on food and nutrient intake was obtained through a food-frequency questionnaire. Overall dietary quality was assessed using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). We found that girls in the highest tertile of hs-CRP levels had a higher intake of saturated fatty acid, and lower intakes of fiber and vitamin E and a lower HEI score when compared to those in tertiles 1 and 2. We also observed a significant decrease in fruit and vegetable intakes by hs-CRP tertile. Factor analysis showed that a dietary pattern that was loaded most strongly with vegetable, fruit, fiber and vitamin A and E intakes correlated negatively (-0.132, p < 0.05) with hs-CRP. No such association was found in boys. In conclusion, our data show that girls with a poorer quality diet show higher hs-CRP levels already at a pre-pubertal age.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; fibre intake; fruit intake; hs-CRP levels; pre-pubertal children; vegetable intake
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28257085 PMCID: PMC5372887 DOI: 10.3390/nu9030224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Anthropometrics measures, hs-CRP levels (mean ± SD) and daily nutrient intake in children by sex.
| Variable | Girls ( | Boys ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 0.6 |
| Weight (kg) | 27.4 ± 5.9 | 27.5 ± 5.6 |
| Height (m) | 1.26 ± 0.07 | 1.27 ± 0.06 |
| BMI | 17.2 ± 2.7 | 17.2 ± 2.6 |
| 0.01 ± 0.96 | 0.05 ± 0.98 | |
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 1.05 ± 1.74 | 0.87 ± 1.55 * |
| Energy (Kcal) | 2090 ± 497 | 2186 ± 518 * |
| Protein energy (%) | 17.2 ± 2.4 | 17.3 ± 2.5 |
| Total fat energy (%) | 45.7 ± 4.5 | 46.4 ± 4.6 |
| Saturated-fat energy (%) | 16.4 ± 2.7 | 17.2 ± 2.8 ** |
| Monounsaturated-fat energy (%) | 18.4 ± 2.7 | 18.3 ± 2.6 |
| Polyunsaturated-fat energy (%) | 8.3 ± 1.8 | 8.2 ± 1.9 |
| Total carbohydrate energy (%) | 38.4 ± 5.8 | 37.8 ± 6.0 |
| Complex-carbohydrate energy (%) | 18.0 ± 4.5 | 17.3 ± 4.1 * |
| Simple-carbohydrate energy (%) | 21.1 ± 5.6 | 21.3 ± 6.1 |
| Fiber (g) | 19.6 ± 7.2 | 19.9 ± 7.6 |
t-test or Mann–Whitney Test when required, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Simple carbohydrates: Sugars in milk, fruit and sugar cane. Complex carbohydrates: Fiber and starches in whole grains, legumes, nuts, seeds and vegetables.
Daily energy, nutrient intakes and HEI score (mean ± SD) by hs-CRP tertile in pre-pubertal children by sex, adjusted for BMI.
| Nutritional Variable | Girls | Boys | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 (≤0.15 mg/L) | Tertile 2 (0.16–0.61 mg/L) | Tertile 3 (≥0.62 mg/L) | Tertile 1 (≤0.15 mg/L) | Tertile 2 (0.16–0.61 mg/L) | Tertile 3 (≥0.62 mg/L) | |||
| Energy (kcal) | 2083 ± 446 | 2104 ± 531 | 2021 ± 492 | NS | 2162 ± 542 | 2173 ± 510 | 2223 ± 539 | NS |
| Protein (%) | 16.9 ± 2.5 | 17.3 ± 2.7 | 17.3 ± 2.5 | NS | 16.9 ± 2.7 | 17.1 ± 2.3 | 17.5 ± 2.4 | NS |
| Total fat (%) | 45.3 ± 4.8 | 46.3 ± 4.2 | 45.7 ± 4.3 | NS | 46.0 ± 4.3 | 46.7 ± 4.5 | 45.6 ± 4.3 | NS |
| Saturated-fat (%) | 15.7 ± 2.7 | 16.6 ± 2.3 | 17.1 ± 3.0 | 1–3 ** | 17.3 ± 2.8 | 17.0 ± 2.7 | 16.9 ± 2.7 | NS |
| Monounsaturated-fat (%) | 17.9 ± 2.5 | 18.5 ± 2.8 | 18.7 ± 2.9 | NS | 18.1 ± 2,4 | 18.5 ± 2.5 | 18.0 ± 2.4 | NS |
| Polyunsaturated-fat (%) | 8.5 ± 1.9 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | 8.1 ± 1.8 | NS | 8.1 ± 1.8 | 8.5 ± 2.1 | 7.9 ± 1.8 | NS |
| Total carbohydrate (%) | 39.3 ± 6.1 | 37.7 ± 5.3 | 38.4 ± 5.8 | NS | 38.4 ± 5.9 | 37.5 ± 5.6 | 38.6 ± 5.7 | NS |
| Simple-carbohydrate (%) | 21.6 ± 5.1 | 20.8 ± 5.9 | 21.3 ± 6.5 | NS | 21.9 ± 6.1 | 21.1 ± 5.4 | 21.7 ± 5.8 | NS |
| Complex-carbohydrate (%) | 18.1 ± 4.5 | 17.8 ± 5.1 | 17.7 ± 3.9 | NS | 17.4 ± 3.9 | 17.5 ± 4.6 | 17.5 ± 4.1 | NS |
| Fiber (g) | 20.8 ± 7.3 | 19.3 ± 7.7 | 17.9 ± 6.3 | 1–3 ** | 19.9 ± 7.4 | 19.5 ± 6.2 | 20.1 ± 6.5 | NS |
| Vitamin A (μg) | 646 ± 169 | 659 ± 170 | 616 ± 206 | NS | 706 ± 207 | 693 ± 191 | 700 ± 212 | NS |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 10.8 ± 3.5 | 10.9 ± 4.3 | 9.8 ± 4.2 | 1–3 * | 10.8 ± 4.7 | 10.9 ± 3.7 | 10.6 ± 3.9 | NS |
| 2–3 * | ||||||||
| HEI score | 66.1 ± 8.9 | 64.7 ± 8.5 | 62.8 ± 10.3 | 1–3 * | 63.4 ± 8.6 | 64.3 ± 7.6 | 65.4 ± 7.9 | NS |
%: percentage of total caloric intake supplied by the nutrient; HEI: Healthy Eating Index; NS: not significant; p value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ANOVA adjusting for BMI with the Tukey or Games–Howell post hoc test.
Figure 1(a) Vegetable, (b) fruit and (c) fiber intakes and (d) HEI score by hsCRP tertiles in pre-pubertal girls after adjusting for BMI. (ANOVA and Tukey or Games–Howell Post Hoc test, p-value: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Factor-loading matrix of two dietary patterns (high vegetable intake pattern and high fat intake dietary pattern) identified in our population by factor analysis.
| Nutritional Variable | Dietary Patterns as Detected by Factor Analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| Factor 1: High Vegetable Intake Diet | Factor 2: High Fat Intake Diet | |
| Energy | 0.786 | −0.160 |
| Protein energy (%) | −0.156 | 0.163 |
| Total fat energy (%) | −0.127 | 0.921 |
| Saturated fat energy (%) | −0.446 | 0.217 |
| Monounsaturated fat energy (%) | −0.002 | 0.782 |
| Polyunsaturated fat energy (%) | −0.005 | 0.712 |
| Total carbohydrate energy (%) | 0.195 | −0.853 |
| Complex carbohydrate energy (%) | 0.009 | −0.384 |
| Simple carbohydrate energy (%) | 0.129 | −0.538 |
| Fiber | 0.814 | −0.307 |
| Vitamin A | 0.521 | 0.071 |
| Vitamin E | 0.779 | −0.002 |
| Fruit | 0.711 | −0.239 |
| Fruit and vegetables | 0.785 | −0.267 |
Coefficients with a significant contribution to the model (values ≥ 0.30) have been underscored.