Literature DB >> 28256385

The role of parotid gland irradiation in the development of severe hyposalivation (xerostomia) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Temporal patterns, risk factors, and testing the QUANTEC guidelines.

Adepitan A Owosho1, Maria Thor2, Jung Hun Oh2, Nadeem Riaz3, C Jillian Tsai3, Haley Rosenberg1, Spyridon Varthis1, Sae Hee K Yom1, Joseph M Huryn1, Nancy Y Lee3, Joseph O Deasy2, Cherry L Estilo4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate temporal patterns and potential risk factors for severe hyposalivation (xerostomia) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), and to test the two QUANTEC (Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2006 and 2015, who had a minimum of three stimulated whole mouth saliva flow measurements (WMSFM) at a median follow-up time of 11 (range: 3-24) months were included. Xerostomia was defined as WMSFM ≤25% compared to relative pre-radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into three follow-up groups: 1: <6 months; 2: 6-11 months; and 3: 12-24 months. Potential risk factors were investigated (Mann-Whitney U test), and relative risks (RRs) assessed for the two QUANTEC guidelines.
RESULTS: The incidence of xerostomia was 27%, 14% and 17% at follow-up time points 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At <6 months, the mean dose to the contralateral and the ipsilateral parotid glands (Dmeancontra, Dmeanipsi) was higher among patients with xerostomia (Dmeancontra: 25 Gy vs. 15 Gy; Dmeanipsi: 44 Gy vs. 25 Gy). Patients with xerostomia had higher pre-RT WMSFM (3.5 g vs. 2.4 g), and had been treated more frequently with additional chemotherapy (93% vs. 63%; all 4 variables: p < 0.05). At 6-11 months, Dmeancontra among patients with xerostomia was higher compared to patients without (26 Gy vs. 20 Gy). The RR as specified by the one- and two-gland QUANTEC guideline was 2.3 and 1.4 for patients with <6 months follow-up time, and 2.0 and 1.2 for patients with longer follow-up (6-11 + 6-24 months).
CONCLUSION: Xerostomia following IMRT peaks within six months post-radiotherapy and fades with time. Limiting the mean dose to both parotid glands (ipsilateral <25 Gy, contralateral <25 Gy) and reducing the use of chemotherapy will likely decrease the rate of xerostomia. Both QUANTEC guidelines are effective in preventing xerostomia.
Copyright © 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck cancer; IMRT; QUANTEC; Severe hyposalivation; Xerostomia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28256385      PMCID: PMC6619497          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Trends in Human Papillomavirus-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Incidence, Vermont 1999-2013.

Authors:  Adepitan A Owosho; Rashidah Wiley; Tessie Stansbury; Semiu O Gbadamosi; Jon S Ryder
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-08

2.  Prognostic Factors for Complete Recovery From Xerostomia After Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Britta Warwas; Karsten Gerull; Ralph Pries; Anke Leichtle; Karl L Bruchhage; Samer G Hakim; Steven E Schild; Florian Cremers
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer reduces rates of late xerostomia.

Authors:  Jianzhong Cao; Xiaodong Zhang; Bo Jiang; Jiayun Chen; Xiaochun Wang; Li Wang; Narayan Sahoo; X Ronald Zhu; Rong Ye; Pierre Blanchard; Adam S Garden; C David Fuller; G Brandon Gunn; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.901

4.  Image guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer: A comparative analysis of dosimetry for target volume and organs at risk.

Authors:  Hironori Akiyama; Csilla Pesznyák; Dalma Béla; Örs Ferenczi; Tibor Major; Csaba Polgár; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Dose/Volume histogram patterns in Salivary Gland subvolumes influence xerostomia injury and recovery.

Authors:  Peijin Han; Pranav Lakshminarayanan; Wei Jiang; Ilya Shpitser; Xuan Hui; Sang Ho Lee; Zhi Cheng; Yue Guo; Russell H Taylor; Sauleh A Siddiqui; Michael Bowers; Khadija Sheikh; Ana Kiess; Brandi R Page; Junghoon Lee; Harry Quon; Todd R McNutt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Yue Guo; Wei Jiang; Pranav Lakshminarayanan; Peijin Han; Zhi Cheng; Michael Bowers; Xuan Hui; Ilya Shpitser; Sauleh Siddiqui; Russell H Taylor; Harry Quon; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.