Literature DB >> 28254585

The Potential Role of Sensory Testing, Skin Biopsy, and Functional Brain Imaging as Biomarkers in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Considerations.

Shannon M Smith, Robert H Dworkin, Dennis C Turk, Ralf Baron, Michael Polydefkis, Irene Tracey, David Borsook, Robert R Edwards, Richard E Harris, Tor D Wager, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Laurie B Burke, Daniel B Carr, Amy Chappell, John T Farrar, Roy Freeman, Ian Gilron, Veeraindar Goli, Juergen Haeussler, Troels Jensen, Nathaniel P Katz, Jeffrey Kent, Ernest A Kopecky, David A Lee, William Maixner, John D Markman, Justin C McArthur, Michael P McDermott, Lav Parvathenani, Srinivasa N Raja, Bob A Rappaport, Andrew S C Rice, Michael C Rowbotham, Jeffrey K Tobias, Ajay D Wasan, James Witter.   

Abstract

Valid and reliable biomarkers can play an important role in clinical trials as indicators of biological or pathogenic processes or as a signal of treatment response. Currently, there are no biomarkers for pain qualified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for use in clinical trials. This article summarizes an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials meeting in which 3 potential biomarkers were discussed for use in the development of analgesic treatments: 1) sensory testing, 2) skin punch biopsy, and 3) brain imaging. The empirical evidence supporting the use of these tests is described within the context of the 4 categories of biomarkers: 1) diagnostic, 2) prognostic, 3) predictive, and 4) pharmacodynamic. Although sensory testing, skin punch biopsy, and brain imaging are promising tools for pain in clinical trials, additional evidence is needed to further support and standardize these tests for use as biomarkers in pain clinical trials. PERSPECTIVE: The applicability of sensory testing, skin biopsy, and brain imaging as diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for use in analgesic treatment trials is considered. Evidence in support of their use and outlining problems is presented, as well as a call for further standardization and demonstrations of validity and reliability.
Copyright © 2017 American Pain Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; IMMPACT; brain imaging; sensory testing; skin punch biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254585      PMCID: PMC5484729          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  214 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Post-herpetic neuralgia: the relation of pain complaint, sensory disturbance, and skin temperature.

Authors:  Michael C Rowbotham; Howard L Fields
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Basal heat pain thresholds predict opioid analgesia in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Prabhav Tella; Mitchell B Max; Srinivasa Raja
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Objective evidence that small-fiber polyneuropathy underlies some illnesses currently labeled as fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Anne Louise Oaklander; Zeva Daniela Herzog; Heather M Downs; Max M Klein
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Dynamic Pain Phenotypes are Associated with Spinal Cord Stimulation-Induced Reduction in Pain: A Repeated Measures Observational Pilot Study.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Luis F Buenaver; Srinivasa N Raja; Kasey B Kiley; Lauren J Swedberg; Paul W Wacnik; Steven P Cohen; Michael A Erdek; Kayode A Williams; Paul J Christo
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Altered quantitative sensory testing outcome in subjects with opioid therapy.

Authors:  Lucy Chen; Charlene Malarick; Lindsey Seefeld; Shuxing Wang; Mary Houghton; Jianren Mao
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The association between pre-operative pain sensitisation and chronic pain after knee replacement: an exploratory study.

Authors:  V Wylde; S Palmer; I D Learmonth; P Dieppe
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Effects of buprenorphine maintenance dose on mu-opioid receptor availability, plasma concentrations, and antagonist blockade in heroin-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Mark K Greenwald; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; David E Moody; James H Woods; Michael R Kilbourn; Robert A Koeppe; Charles R Schuster; Jon-Kar Zubieta
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Brain white matter changes associated with urological chronic pelvic pain syndrome: multisite neuroimaging from a MAPP case-control study.

Authors:  Lejian Huang; Jason J Kutch; Benjamin M Ellingson; Katherine T Martucci; Richard E Harris; Daniel J Clauw; Sean Mackey; Emeran A Mayer; Anthony J Schaeffer; A Vania Apkarian; Melissa A Farmer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  The Pain in Neuropathy Study (PiNS): a cross-sectional observational study determining the somatosensory phenotype of painful and painless diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Andreas C Themistocleous; Juan D Ramirez; Pallai R Shillo; Jonathan G Lees; Dinesh Selvarajah; Christine Orengo; Solomon Tesfaye; Andrew S C Rice; David L H Bennett
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.926

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral and central viewpoints of chronic pain, and translational implications.

Authors:  A Vania Apkarian; Diane Reckziegel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Progress in pain medicine: where are we now?

Authors:  Lesley A Colvin; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Breaking barriers to novel analgesic drug development.

Authors:  Ajay S Yekkirala; David P Roberson; Bruce P Bean; Clifford J Woolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Composite Pain Biomarker Signatures for Objective Assessment and Effective Treatment.

Authors:  Irene Tracey; Clifford J Woolf; Nick A Andrews
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  Essential statistical principles of clinical trials of pain treatments.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Scott R Evans; Omar Mbowe; Michael P McDermott
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 6.  Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Headache and Migraine: Why to Prescribe and What New Research Is Critical for Advancing Integrated Biobehavioral Care.

Authors:  Ashley M Kroon Van Diest; Scott W Powers
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 7.  Deconstructing biomarkers for chronic pain: context- and hypothesis-dependent biomarker types in relation to chronic pain.

Authors:  Diane Reckziegel; Etienne Vachon-Presseau; Bogdan Petre; Thomas J Schnitzer; Marwan N Baliki; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Similarities and Differences Between Migraine in Children and Adults: Presentation, Disability, and Response to Treatment.

Authors:  Ashley M Kroon Van Diest; Michelle M Ernst; Shalonda Slater; Scott W Powers
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2017-10-25

9.  Test-Retest and Inter-Examiner Reliability of a Novel Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery in Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients.

Authors:  Ajay D Wasan; Benedict J Alter; Robert R Edwards; Charles E Argoff; Nalini Sehgal; David Walk; Toby Moeller-Bertram; Mark S Wallace; Misha Backonja
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Pharmacologic Modulation of Noxious Stimulus-evoked Brain Activation in Cynomolgus Macaques Observed with Functional Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Tomomi Shirai; Mizuho Yano; Takahiro Natsume; YūJi Awaga; Yoshitaka Itani; Aldric Hama; Akihisa Matsuda; Hiroyuki Takamatsu
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.