Literature DB >> 28254243

Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Psychometric properties and cut-off values.

Akvile Bukenaite1, Jan Stochl1, Nilufar Mossaheb2, Miriam R Schäfer3, Claudia M Klier4, Jana Becker5, Monika Schloegelhofer6, Konstantinos Papageorgiou7, Angel L Montejo8, Debra A Russo1, Peter B Jones9, Jesus Perez10, G Paul Amminger3.   

Abstract

A need for a brief, easy to complete self-report questionnaire to detect people at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) in busy clinical settings has been recognised. Our aim was to explore whether the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences - Positive 15-items Scale (CAPE-P15) could be used as a screening tool to identify people at UHR in a clinical setting. Our objectives were to confirm the CAPE-P15 factorial structure as well as its reliability and determine cut-off values for the detection of such individuals using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS), a commonly used clinical interview for the detection of UHR. 165 participants aged between 13 and 18 referred to the General Hospital of Vienna were included in the analysis. 50.9% of the sample were "CAARMS-positive" and 49.1% "CAARMS-negative". The Youden method determined CAPE-P15 cut-off values for UHR detection of 1.47 for both frequency of and distress associated with psychotic experiences. The cut-off value of 1.47 for frequency showed sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 58%, a positive predictive value of 66% and a negative predictive value of 71%; whilst for distress it showed sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 63%, a positive predictive value of 69% and a negative predictive value of 66%. Good reliability and the previously suggested three-correlated factor model as well as an alternative bi-factor model of the CAPE-P15 were confirmed. The CAPE-P15 seems to be a promising screening tool for identifying people who might be at UHR in busy clinical settings.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAARMS; CAPE; CAPE-P15; Psychosis; Screening; Ultra-high risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254243     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  18 in total

1.  Association Between Wisdom and Psychotic-Like Experiences in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Zhipeng Wu; Zhengqian Jiang; Zhipeng Wang; Yuqiao Ji; Feiwen Wang; Brendan Ross; Xiaoqi Sun; Zhening Liu; Yicheng Long
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  A Latent Profile Analysis of Psychotic Experiences, Non-psychotic Symptoms, Suicidal Ideation and Underlying Mechanisms in a Sample of Adolescents From the General Population.

Authors:  Álvaro I Langer; Klaas Wardenaar; Johanna T W Wigman; José Luis Ulloa; Daniel Núñez
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Expanding the positivity offset theory of anhedonia to the psychosis continuum.

Authors:  Marcel Riehle; Matthias Pillny; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Schizophrenia (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Mediating role of impaired wisdom in the relation between childhood trauma and psychotic-like experiences in Chinese college students: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jiamei Zhang; Zhening Liu; Yicheng Long; Haojuan Tao; Xuan Ouyang; Guowei Wu; Min Chen; Miaoyu Yu; Liang Zhou; Meng Sun; Dongsheng Lv; Guangcheng Cui; Qizhong Yi; Hong Tang; Cuixia An; Jianjian Wang; Zhipeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.144

5.  Three types of psychotic-like experiences in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Henry R Cowan; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.760

6.  Coproducing healthcare service improvement for people with common mental health disorders including psychotic experiences: a study protocol of a multiperspective qualitative study.

Authors:  Alexandros Georgiadis; Robbie Duschinsky; Jesus Perez; Peter B Jones; Debra Russo; Clare Knight; Emma Soneson; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A physiological examination of perceived incorporation during trance.

Authors:  Helané Wahbeh; Cedric Cannard; Jennifer Okonsky; Arnaud Delorme
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-17

8.  Cultural differences in positive psychotic experiences assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-42 (CAPE-42): a comparison of student populations in the Netherlands, Nigeria and Norway.

Authors:  Margriet Vermeiden; Mayke Janssens; Viviane Thewissen; Esther Akinsola; Sanne Peeters; Jennifer Reijnders; Nele Jacobs; Jim van Os; Johan Lataster
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Evidence for Specific Associations Between Depressive Symptoms, Psychotic Experiences, and Suicidal Ideation in Chilean Adolescents From the General Population.

Authors:  Daniel Núñez; Pía Monjes; Susana Campos; Johanna T W Wigman
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Validation of the Korean Version of the 15-Item Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a College Population.

Authors:  Sung-Wan Kim; Jae-Kyeong Kim; Ji Hun Han; Min Jhon; Ju-Wan Kim; Ju-Yeon Lee; Jae-Min Kim; Hyun Ju Na; Young-Shin Kang; Young-Chul Chung; Jin-Sang Yoon
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.