Henry R Cowan1, Vijay A Mittal2. 1. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Swift Hall, 2029 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. hrcowan@u.northwestern.edu. 2. Psychology, Psychiatry, Medical Social Sciences, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A fully dimensional model of psychosis implies that psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) connect the entire psychosis spectrum. Three types of self-reported PLEs-persecutory ideation, bizarre experiences, and perceptual abnormalities-are commonly found in the general population. This study assessed the construct, predictive, and incremental validity of self-reported PLEs in youth at clinical high risk for psychotic disorders (CHR). METHODS: Self-report data on PLEs (community assessment of psychic experiences; CAPE) were collected from 105 CHR youth (mage = 19.3). Interview measures of attenuated psychotic symptoms and self-report measures of psychosis proneness, depression, and anxiety were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up (n = 70 at follow-up). Factor, cross-sectional, and longitudinal analyses examined relationships between study variables. RESULTS: Self-reported PLEs were best represented by the same three factors found in the general population: persecutory ideation, bizarre experiences, and perceptual abnormalities. Cross-sectionally, PLEs-particularly persecutory ideation-correlated with interview-rated attenuated psychotic symptoms and self-reported psychosis proneness, depression, and anxiety. Longitudinally, baseline PLEs trended toward predicting 12-month change in positive attenuated psychotic symptoms (r = .29, pFDR = .058). Incrementally, baseline PLEs predicted 12-month change in positive and disorganized symptoms, when accounting for the effect of baseline positive symptoms and demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Three types of PLEs were valid in this CHR sample. Self-reported PLEs may be used not only to screen individuals for inclusion in the CHR classification, but also to characterize individuals within this population. Self-reported PLEs may help to forecast which CHR individuals will progress toward psychotic illness.
BACKGROUND: A fully dimensional model of psychosis implies that psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) connect the entire psychosis spectrum. Three types of self-reported PLEs-persecutory ideation, bizarre experiences, and perceptual abnormalities-are commonly found in the general population. This study assessed the construct, predictive, and incremental validity of self-reported PLEs in youth at clinical high risk for psychotic disorders (CHR). METHODS: Self-report data on PLEs (community assessment of psychic experiences; CAPE) were collected from 105 CHR youth (mage = 19.3). Interview measures of attenuated psychotic symptoms and self-report measures of psychosis proneness, depression, and anxiety were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up (n = 70 at follow-up). Factor, cross-sectional, and longitudinal analyses examined relationships between study variables. RESULTS: Self-reported PLEs were best represented by the same three factors found in the general population: persecutory ideation, bizarre experiences, and perceptual abnormalities. Cross-sectionally, PLEs-particularly persecutory ideation-correlated with interview-rated attenuated psychotic symptoms and self-reported psychosis proneness, depression, and anxiety. Longitudinally, baseline PLEs trended toward predicting 12-month change in positive attenuated psychotic symptoms (r = .29, pFDR = .058). Incrementally, baseline PLEs predicted 12-month change in positive and disorganized symptoms, when accounting for the effect of baseline positive symptoms and demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Three types of PLEs were valid in this CHR sample. Self-reported PLEs may be used not only to screen individuals for inclusion in the CHR classification, but also to characterize individuals within this population. Self-reported PLEs may help to forecast which CHR individuals will progress toward psychotic illness.
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Stefan Borgwardt; Andreas Bechdolf; Jean Addington; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Matcheri Keshavan; Stephen Wood; Stephan Ruhrmann; Larry J Seidman; Lucia Valmaggia; Tyrone Cannon; Eva Velthorst; Lieuwe De Haan; Barbara Cornblatt; Ilaria Bonoldi; Max Birchwood; Thomas McGlashan; William Carpenter; Patrick McGorry; Joachim Klosterkötter; Philip McGuire; Alison Yung Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Colm Healy; Ross Brannigan; Niamh Dooley; Helen Coughlan; Mary Clarke; Ian Kelleher; Mary Cannon Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Akvile Bukenaite; Jan Stochl; Nilufar Mossaheb; Miriam R Schäfer; Claudia M Klier; Jana Becker; Monika Schloegelhofer; Konstantinos Papageorgiou; Angel L Montejo; Debra A Russo; Peter B Jones; Jesus Perez; G Paul Amminger Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Álvaro I Langer; Klaas Wardenaar; Johanna T W Wigman; José Luis Ulloa; Daniel Núñez Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 5.435