Literature DB >> 28253635

The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.

Rachel L Ellinger1, Kasey M Jakien1, Frederick J Gallun1.   

Abstract

Interaural differences in time (ITDs) and interaural differences in level (ILDs) contribute to a listener's ability to achieve spatial release from masking (SRM), and help to improve speech intelligibility in noisy environments. In this study, the extent to which ITDs and ILDs contribute to SRM and the relationships with aging and hearing loss were examined. SRM was greatest when stimuli were presented with consistent ITD and ILD, relative to ITD or ILD alone, all of which produced greater SRM than when ITD and ILD cues were in conflict with each other. This pattern was independent of age and hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28253635      PMCID: PMC5392079          DOI: 10.1121/1.4976113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.

Authors:  R S Bolia; W T Nelson; M A Ericson; B D Simpson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 3.  Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Louise Hickson; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-08

4.  TIME-INTENSITY RELATIONS IN BINAURAL UNMASKING.

Authors:  H S COLBURN; N I DURLACH
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of head-induced interaural time and level differences in the speech reception threshold for multiple interfering sound sources.

Authors:  John F Culling; Monica L Hawley; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Analysis of binaural detection models for dependence on interaural target parameters.

Authors:  R H Domnitz; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Jörg M Buchholz; Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron; Louise Hickson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency stimuli: the inability to trade time and intensity completely.

Authors:  E R Hafter; S C Carrier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The extent to which a position-based explanation accounts for binaural release from informational masking.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Nathaniel I Durlach; H Steven Colburn; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Enhancing the perceptual segregation and localization of sound sources with a triple beamformer.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Todd R Jennings; Andrew J Byrne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort.

Authors:  Jan Rennies; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Laura Coco; Tess K Koerner; E Sebastian Lelo de Larrea-Mancera; Michelle R Molis; David A Eddins; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Comparing Spatial Release From Masking Using Traditional Methods and Portable Automated Rapid Testing iPad App.

Authors:  Nirmal Kumar Srinivasan; Allison Holtz; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Microsecond interaural time difference discrimination restored by cochlear implants after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl; Alexa N Buck; Kongyan Li; Jan Wh Schnupp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.

Authors:  Jan Rennies; Virginia Best; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Nicole E Corbin; Emily Buss; Brian B Monson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Normative Data for a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Kasey M Jakien; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Kasey M Jakien; Sean D Kampel; Meghan M Stansell; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.