Literature DB >> 23927217

The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.

Helen Glyde1, Jörg M Buchholz, Harvey Dillon, Sharon Cameron, Louise Hickson.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have described improvements in speech understanding when interaural time differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs) are present. The present study aimed to investigate whether either cue in isolation can elicit spatial release from masking (SRM) in a speech-on-speech masking paradigm with maskers positioned symmetrically around the listener. Twelve adults were tested using three presentations of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test, with each presentation modified to contain different interaural cues in the stimuli. Results suggest that ILDs provide a similar amount of SRM as ITDs and ILDs combined. ITDs alone provide significantly less benefit.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927217     DOI: 10.1121/1.4812441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A New Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Informational Masking in Speech Perception Among Elderly Listeners.

Authors:  Marzieh Amiri; Farnoush Jarollahi; Shohreh Jalaie; Seyyed Jalal Sameni
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-21

2.  The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.

Authors:  Rachel L Ellinger; Kasey M Jakien; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Jörg M Buchholz; Lillian Nielsen; Virginia Best; Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron; Louise Hickson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.

Authors:  Yuqi Deng; Inyong Choi; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Robert Baumgartner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Can visual capture of sound separate auditory streams?

Authors:  Chiara Valzolgher; Elena Giovanelli; Roberta Sorio; Giuseppe Rabini; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Gusztáv Lőcsei; Julie H Pedersen; Søren Laugesen; Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The Benefits of Increased Sensation Level and Bandwidth for Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Kasey M Jakien; Sean D Kampel; Samuel Y Gordon; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Toward Optimal Care for Children With Congenital Unilateral Aural Atresia.

Authors:  Filip Asp; Robert J Stokroos; Martijn J H Agterberg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.