Literature DB >> 28252983

Assessing inter-model continuity between the Section II and Section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5.

Chloe M Evans1, Leonard J Simms1.   

Abstract

DSM-5 includes 2 competing models of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in Sections II and III. Empirical comparisons between these models are required to understand and improve intermodel continuity. We compared Section III BPD traits to Section II BPD criteria assessed via semistructured interviews in 455 current/recent psychiatric patients using correlation and regression analyses, and also evaluated the incremental predictive power of other Section III traits. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that self-harm would incrementally predict BPD Criterion 5 over the Section III traits. Results supported Section III BPD traits as an adequate representation of traditional BPD symptomatology, although modifications that would increase intermodel continuity were identified. Finally, we found support for the incremental validity of suspiciousness, anhedonia, perceptual dysregulation, and self-harm, suggesting possible gaps in the Section III PD trait definitions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28252983      PMCID: PMC5581731          DOI: 10.1037/per0000243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Personal Disord        ISSN: 1949-2723


  27 in total

1.  The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Lisa M Saulsman; Andrew C Page
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-01

2.  A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures.

Authors:  Jaime Anderson; Stephen Snider; Martin Sellbom; Robert Krueger; Christopher Hopwood
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Comparing External Correlates of DSM-5 Section II and Section III Dimensional Trait Operationalizations of Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Jaime L Anderson; Martin Sellbom; Randy A Sansone; Douglas A Songer
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2015-04-23

4.  Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5.

Authors:  Robert F Krueger; Nicholas R Eaton; Lee Anna Clark; David Watson; Kristian E Markon; Jaime Derringer; Andrew Skodol; W John Livesley
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2011-04

5.  Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: introducing the CAT-PD project.

Authors:  Leonard J Simms; Lewis R Goldberg; John E Roberts; David Watson; John Welte; Jane H Rotterman
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2011-07

6.  Comparing criterion- and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5.

Authors:  Wern How Yam; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2014-08-11

7.  DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders.

Authors:  Christopher J Hopwood; Katherine M Thomas; Kristian E Markon; Aidan G C Wright; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2012-01-16

8.  A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07-04

9.  Coverage of the DSM-IV-TR/DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders With the DSM-5 Dimensional Trait Model.

Authors:  Stephanie L Rojas; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2016-09-12

Review 10.  Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder: implications for classification.

Authors:  W J Livesley; M L Schroeder; D N Jackson; K L Jang
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-02
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  The role of DSM-5 borderline personality symptomatology and traits in the link between childhood trauma and suicidal risk in psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Bo Bach; Rita Fjeldsted
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2017-06-18

3.  Familial risk and heritability of diagnosed borderline personality disorder: a register study of the Swedish population.

Authors:  Charlotte Skoglund; Annika Tiger; Christian Rück; Predrag Petrovic; Philip Asherson; Clara Hellner; David Mataix-Cols; Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  Borderline personality disorder diagnosis in a new key.

Authors:  Abby L Mulay; Mark H Waugh; J Parks Fillauer; Donna S Bender; Anthony Bram; Nicole M Cain; Eve Caligor; Miriam K Forbes; Laurel B Goodrich; Jan H Kamphuis; Jared W Keeley; Robert F Krueger; John E Kurtz; Peter Jacobsson; Katie C Lewis; Gina M P Rossi; Jeremy M Ridenour; Michael Roche; Martin Sellbom; Carla Sharp; Andrew E Skodol
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2019-12-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.