Literature DB >> 24656519

A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures.

Jaime Anderson1, Stephen Snider2, Martin Sellbom3, Robert Krueger4, Christopher Hopwood5.   

Abstract

The DSM-5 Section III includes a hybrid model for the diagnosis of personality disorders, in which sets of dimensional personality trait facets are configured into personality disorder types. These PD types resemble the Section II categorical counterparts with dimensional traits descriptive of the Section II criteria to maintain continuity across the diagnostic systems. The current study sought to evaluate the continuity across the Section II and III models of personality disorders. This sample consisted of 397 undergraduate students, administered the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (Krueger et al., 2012) and the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis II Disorders-Personality Questionnaire (First et al., 2013). We examined whether the DSM-5 Section III trait facets for the PDs would be associated with their respective Section II counterparts, as well as determining whether additional facets could augment the prediction of the Section II disorders. Results revealed that, generally, the DSM-5 Section II disorders were most strongly associated with their Section III traits. Results also showed evidence to support the addition of facets not included in the Section III diagnostic criteria in the prediction of most disorders. These results show general support for the Section III model of personality disorders, however, results also show that additional research is needed to replicate these findings.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DSM-5; PID-5; Personality disorders; Personality traits

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24656519     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  12 in total

1.  Associations between changes in normal personality traits and borderline personality disorder symptoms over 16 years.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Christopher J Hopwood; Mary C Zanarini
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 2.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Hopwood; Roman Kotov; Robert F Krueger; David Watson; Thomas A Widiger; Robert R Althoff; Emily B Ansell; Bo Bach; R Michael Bagby; Mark A Blais; Marina A Bornovalova; Michael Chmielewski; David C Cicero; Christopher Conway; Barbara De Clercq; Filip De Fruyt; Anna R Docherty; Nicholas R Eaton; John F Edens; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Michael P Hengartner; Masha Y Ivanova; Daniel Leising; W John Livesley; Mark R Lukowitsky; Donald R Lynam; Kristian E Markon; Joshua D Miller; Leslie C Morey; Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt; J Hans Ormel; Christopher J Patrick; Aaron L Pincus; Camilo Ruggero; Douglas B Samuel; Martin Sellbom; Tim Slade; Jennifer L Tackett; Katherine M Thomas; Timothy J Trull; David D Vachon; Irwin D Waldman; Monika A Waszczuk; Mark H Waugh; Aidan G C Wright; Mathew M Yalch; David H Zald; Johannes Zimmermann
Journal:  Personal Ment Health       Date:  2017-12-11

4.  Assessing inter-model continuity between the Section II and Section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5.

Authors:  Chloe M Evans; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2017-03-02

5.  Improving characterization of psychopathy within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), alternative model for personality disorders: Creation and validation of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Triarchic scales.

Authors:  Laura E Drislane; Martin Sellbom; Sarah J Brislin; Casey M Strickland; Elliott Christian; Dustin B Wygant; Robert F Krueger; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 6.  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, alternative model conceptualization of borderline personality disorder: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Salome Vanwoerden; Stephanie D Stepp
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2022-07

7.  Reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).

Authors:  Zita S Nagy; Ella Salgó; Bettina Bajzát; Bálint Hajduska-Dér; Zsolt Szabolcs Unoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Continuity between DSM-5 Categorical Criteria and Traits Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Bo Bach; Martin Sellbom
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Personality Pathology among Adults with History of Childhood Sexual Abuse: Study of the Relevance of DSM-5 Proposed Traits and Psychobiological Features of Temperament and Character.

Authors:  Azad Hemmati; Giles Newton-Howes; Shafea Falahi; Sattar Mostafavi; Calvin A Colarusso; Saeid Komasi
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2020-08-11

10.  The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population.

Authors:  Jens C Thimm; Stian Jordan; Bo Bach
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2016-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.