| Literature DB >> 28638621 |
Bo Bach1,2, Rita Fjeldsted2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood traumas appear to be linked to suicidal behavior. However, the factors that mediate between these two phenomena are not sufficiently understood. Recent findings suggest that borderline personality disorder (BPD) may explain some of the association.Entities:
Keywords: Borderline personality disorder; Child abuse; Child maltreatment; Childhood trauma; DSM-5 Section III personality traits; Depressivity; Dissociation; Personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5); Suicidal risk; Suicidality
Year: 2017 PMID: 28638621 PMCID: PMC5474295 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-017-0063-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul ISSN: 2051-6673
Sociodemographic characteristics of the 124 patients
| Gender; | |
| Female | 97 (78.2%) |
| Male | 27 (21.8%) |
| Age; years | |
| Mean ( | 28.9 (8.45) |
| Range | 18 – 56 |
| Relationship status; | |
| In a relationship | 72 (58.1%) |
| Single | 52 (41.9%) |
| Occupational status; | |
| Employeda | 24 (19.4%) |
| Unemployedb | 100 (80.6%) |
| Educational level; | |
| Above bachelor level | 6 (4.8%) |
| At bachelor level | 9 (7.3%) |
| Below bachelor level | 47 (27.9%) |
| No education | 62 (50.0%) |
| Psychiatric Services History; | |
| Acute/emergency admission | 48 (38.7%) |
| Inpatient admission | 46 (37.1%) |
| Outpatient admission | 55 (44.4%) |
| Lifetime Suicidality; | |
| Never had any suicidal ideations | 13 (10.5%) |
| Have contemplated suicide | 36 (29.0%) |
| Have planned suicide | 12 (9.7%) |
| Have attempted suicide | 63 (50.8%) |
aStudent, employee, or self-employed; bincludes long-term sick leave and disability pension
Characteristics of DSM-5 section II personality disorders and mental disorders
| Personality disorder |
| Mental disorders |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Paranoid | 61 (49.2%) | Major Depressive Disorder | 36 (29.0%) |
| Schizotypal | 10 (8.1%) | Dysthymia | 38 (30.6%) | |
| Schizoid | 5 (4.0%) | Social Phobia | 58 (46.8%) | |
| Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder | 39 (31.5%) | |||
| B | Borderline | 89 (71.8%) | Panic Disorder | 52 (41.9%) |
| Narcissistic | 3 (2.4%) | Agoraphobia | 66 (53.2%) | |
| Histrionic | 0 (0.0%) | Obsessive Compulsive Disorder | 42 (33.9%) | |
| Antisocial | 22 (17.7%) | Anorexia Nervosa | 5 (4.0%) | |
| C | Bulimia Nervosa | 26 (21.0%) | ||
| Avoidant | 65 (52.4%) | Generalized Anxiety Disorder | 25 (20.2%) | |
| Dependent | 18 (14.5%) | Substance Use Disorder | 13 (10.5%) | |
| Obsessive-Compulsive | 40 (32.3%) | Alcohol Use Disorder | 10 (8.1%) | |
| Lifetime Psychotic Episode | 14 (11.3%) | |||
| Not Otherwise Specified | 6 (4.8%) | No criteria met | 1 (0.8%) | |
| No criteria met | 7 (5.6%) |
N = 124
Bivariate associations among study variables
| 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. | 9. | 10. | 11. | M (SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | MINI Level of Suicidal Risk | 2.67 (1.03) | |||||||||||
| 2. | CTQ Childhood Trauma | .22 | 2.17 (0.73) | ||||||||||
| 3. | SCID-II BPD criterion count | .37 | .42 | 5.65 (2.41) | |||||||||
| 4. | PID-5 Emotional Lability | .30 | .06 | .49 | 1.80 (0.65) | ||||||||
| 5. | PID-5 Separation Insecurity | .38 | .12 | .44 | .45 | 1.34 (0.90) | |||||||
| 6. | PID-5 Anxiousness | .31 | .19 | .40 | .53 | .49 | 1.91 (0.67) | ||||||
| 7. | PID-5 Depressivity | .53 | .30 | .45 | .43 | .45 | .58 | 1.53 (0.70) | |||||
| 8. | PID-5 Hostility | .23 | .20 | .53 | .33 | .41 | .34 | .25 | 1.32 (0.67) | ||||
| 9. | PID-5 Impulsivity | .24 | .20 | .51 | .30 | .27 | .09 | .21 | .45 | 1.10 (0.74) | |||
| 10. | PID-5 Risk Taking | .09 | .14 | .21 | -.15 | -.05 | -.26 | -.05 | .25 | .40 | 1.10 (0.64) | ||
| 11. | PID-5 Suspiciousnessa | .34 | .39 | .65 | .44 | .48 | .52 | .56 | .58 | .36 | .11 | 1.49 (0.80) | |
| 12. | PID-5 Perceptual Dysregulationa | .39 | .37 | .39 | .25 | .20 | .38 | .41 | .34 | .32 | .28 | .46 | 0.86 (0.53) |
N = 124; MINI Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 6.0 – Suicidality Module, CTQ Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (total score), SCID-II Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Borderline Personality Disorder, PID-5 Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Correlations from .19 are significant at the 0.05 level and correlations from .30 are significant at the 0.001 level. aPID-5 facets that were added to the operationalization of BPD based on empirical findings [29, 30, 32, 33]
Fig. 1Mediation analyses of BPD features between Childhood Trauma and Level of Suicidal Risk. Note. N = 124 patients. Bolded values are indirect/mediating effects, with standardized effects in parentheses. The a-, b- and c-paths represent regression coefficients. c = total effect, c’ = direct effect (when a and b are accounted for). All coefficients marked with an asterisk (*) are significant in terms of 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals that do not contain zero (10,000 bootstrapped samples). In mediation model B, all mediator variables (i.e., PID-5 scales) were analyzed simultaneously while controlling for the effect of the other scales. Estimations were statistically adjusted for age, gender, and educational level. a DSM-5 Section II. b DSM-5 Section-III Traits
Fig. 2Parallel mediation analysis comparing the indirect effect of DSM-5 Section II versus Section III BPD composite scores. Note. N = 124 patients. Bolded values are indirect/mediating effects with standardized effects in parentheses. The a-, b- and c-paths represent regression coefficients. Coefficients marked with an asterisk (*) are significant in terms of 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals that do not contain zero (10,000 bootstrapped samples). c = total effect, c’ = direct effect (when a and b are accounted for). The two mediator variables (i.e., BPD scores) were analyzed simultaneously while controlling for the effect of one another. The contrast between the two BPD measures in terms of mediating effect was -.011*. Estimations were statistically adjusted for age, gender, and educational level