Literature DB >> 28251314

Molecular diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis: evaluation in rat model and application in suspected human cases.

Adriana Oliveira Costa1, Cinthia Furst2, Lucas Oliveira Rocha3, Cecília Cirelli4, Carolina Neris Cardoso4, Fagner Salmazo Neiva3, Cynara Oliveira Possamai2, Daniel de Assis Santos5, Vanete Thomaz-Soccol3.   

Abstract

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a progressive corneal infection that demands rapid and sensitive techniques for diagnosis to avoid risk of visual impairment. We evaluated two DNA extraction techniques and a semi-nested-PCR (snPCR) targeting the 18S rRNA gene to detect Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites. The most effective protocol was evaluated in samples of corneal scrapings and biopsies from an AK rat model and applied to diagnosis of human cases of AK. DNA extraction performed with a commercial kit based on DNA binding to magnetic beads was more efficient than a method based on alkaline lysis, allowing the detection of one trophozoite and one cyst of Acanthamoeba in samples prepared from cultures. This technique and sn-PCR were applied in corneal scrapings of rats experimentally infected with Acanthamoeba (n = 6), resulting in 100% of positivity, against 16.7% (n = 6) of positive identification in culture method using non-nutrient agar (NNA) with Escherichia coli. Corneal biopsies from rats were also tested (n = 6) and resulted in positivity in all samples in both molecular and culture methods. Eight out of ten presumptive human cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis were also confirmed by sn-PCR of scrapping samples, while the culture method was positive in only four cases. We discuss that animal model of AK can be an efficient tool to validate diagnostic methods and conclude that DNA extraction with the kit and snPCR protocol described here is an effective alternative for diagnosis of AK.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acanthamoeba keratitis; Culture; Diagnosis; Rat model; Semi-nested PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251314     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5411-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  24 in total

1.  Pathogenicity, morphology, and differentiation of Acanthamoeba.

Authors:  N A Khan
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  A simple PCR condition for detection of a single cyst of Acanthamoeba species.

Authors:  Porntip Laummaunwai; Wipaporn Ruangjirachuporn; Thidarut Boonmars
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009.

Authors:  John K G Dart; Valerie P J Saw; Simon Kilvington
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Comparison of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. from clinical specimens submitted for keratitis.

Authors:  Krishna Khairnar; Gurdip S Tamber; Filip Ralevski; Dylan R Pillai
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Microbiologic and histopathologic assessment of corneal biopsies in the evaluation of microbial keratitis.

Authors:  Jared R Younger; R Duncan Johnson; Gary N Holland; Jon P Page; Richard L Nepomuceno; Ben J Glasgow; Anthony J Aldave; Fei Yu; Jason Litak; Bartly J Mondino
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Light and electron microscopic observations on encystment of Acanthamoeba palestinensis, Reich.

Authors:  M Lasman
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1977-05

7.  A review of 72 consecutive cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis, 1984-1992.

Authors:  A S Bacon; D G Frazer; J K Dart; M Matheson; L A Ficker; P Wright
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Update on Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Nicholas J R Maycock; Rakesh Jayaswal
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Validation of real-time PCR for laboratory diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Authors:  Paul P Thompson; Regis P Kowalski; Robert M Q Shanks; Y Jerold Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Resistance of Acanthamoeba to classic DNA extraction methods used for the diagnosis of corneal infections.

Authors:  P Goldschmidt; S Degorge; C Saint-Jean; H Yera; H Year; F Zekhnini; L Batellier; L Laroche; C Chaumeil
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  3 in total

1.  Acanthamoeba of three morphological groups and distinct genotypes exhibit variable and weakly inter-related physiological properties.

Authors:  Cynara Oliveira Possamai; Ana Carolina Loss; Adriana Oliveira Costa; Aloisio Falqueto; Cinthia Furst
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Clinical and molecular diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens wearers in southern Brazil reveals the presence of an endosymbiont.

Authors:  Denise Leal Dos Santos; Veridiana Gomes Virginio; Francisco Kercher Berté; Karina Rodrigues Lorenzatto; Diane Ruschel Marinho; Sergio Kwitko; Claudete Inês Locatelli; Eduarda Correa Freitas; Marilise Brittes Rott
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.383

3.  A history of over 40 years of potentially pathogenic free-living amoeba studies in Brazil - a systematic review.

Authors:  Natália Karla Bellini; Otavio Henrique Thiemann; María Reyes-Batlle; Jacob Lorenzo-Morales; Adriana Oliveira Costa
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.747

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.