PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of corneal biopsy in the evaluation of infectious keratitis; to compare results of culture and histopathologic examination of the same specimens; to investigate potential factors related to positive biopsy results. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: We reviewed medical records for all patients who underwent corneal biopsy because of infectious keratitis at the Jules Stein Eye Institute from June 1989 through June 2009. In general, biopsy specimens were both cultured and examined histopathologically. Lesion size, lesion progression, and interval from presentation to biopsy were analyzed as possible predictors of positive biopsies. RESULTS: Organisms were identified in 20 of 48 (42%) consecutive biopsies (positive cultures in 9 of 47 cases [19%]; positive histopathologic examination in 19 of 47 cases [40%]). Culture and histopathologic results were concordant in 30 of 46 biopsies (65%) for which both techniques were performed; 10 of the 16 discordant cases were culture-negative/histopathology-positive, while the remaining 6 had positive but discordant results for the 2 techniques (cultures all showed bacteria; histopathologic examination showed fungi or cysts consistent with Acanthamoeba sp.). Corneal biopsy revealed microorganisms in 12 of 27 patients (44%) with negative cultures of corneal scrapings obtained at presentation. None of the potential risk factors was statistically associated with positive biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biopsy can be useful for identifying the cause of infectious keratitis in selected cases. Culture and histopathologic examination can provide complementary information, but discordant results may occur. Acanthamoebic and fungal infections are more likely to be identified by histopathologic examination.
PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of corneal biopsy in the evaluation of infectious keratitis; to compare results of culture and histopathologic examination of the same specimens; to investigate potential factors related to positive biopsy results. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. METHODS: We reviewed medical records for all patients who underwent corneal biopsy because of infectious keratitis at the Jules Stein Eye Institute from June 1989 through June 2009. In general, biopsy specimens were both cultured and examined histopathologically. Lesion size, lesion progression, and interval from presentation to biopsy were analyzed as possible predictors of positive biopsies. RESULTS: Organisms were identified in 20 of 48 (42%) consecutive biopsies (positive cultures in 9 of 47 cases [19%]; positive histopathologic examination in 19 of 47 cases [40%]). Culture and histopathologic results were concordant in 30 of 46 biopsies (65%) for which both techniques were performed; 10 of the 16 discordant cases were culture-negative/histopathology-positive, while the remaining 6 had positive but discordant results for the 2 techniques (cultures all showed bacteria; histopathologic examination showed fungi or cysts consistent with Acanthamoeba sp.). Corneal biopsy revealed microorganisms in 12 of 27 patients (44%) with negative cultures of corneal scrapings obtained at presentation. None of the potential risk factors was statistically associated with positive biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal biopsy can be useful for identifying the cause of infectious keratitis in selected cases. Culture and histopathologic examination can provide complementary information, but discordant results may occur. Acanthamoebic and fungal infections are more likely to be identified by histopathologic examination.
Authors: J Michael Miller; Matthew J Binnicker; Sheldon Campbell; Karen C Carroll; Kimberle C Chapin; Peter H Gilligan; Mark D Gonzalez; Robert C Jerris; Sue C Kehl; Robin Patel; Bobbi S Pritt; Sandra S Richter; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Joseph D Schwartzman; James W Snyder; Sam Telford; Elitza S Theel; Richard B Thomson; Melvin P Weinstein; Joseph D Yao Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Allen O Eghrari; Connie Gibas; Tonya Watkins; Sina Vahedi; Rick Lee; Elizabeth Houle; Maria Jose Suarez; Charles Eberhart; Deanna A Sutton; Nathan P Wiederhold; Shameema Sikder; Sean X Zhang Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-06-24 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Darren S J Ting; Bhavesh P Gopal; Rashmi Deshmukh; Gerami D Seitzman; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Mihail Zemba; Otilia-Maria Dumitrescu; Andreea-Elena Dimirache; Daniel Constantin Branisteanu; Florian Balta; Marian Burcea; Andreea Dana Moraru; Sinziana Gradinaru Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 2.447