Literature DB >> 21658877

Comparison of molecular diagnostic methods for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. from clinical specimens submitted for keratitis.

Krishna Khairnar1, Gurdip S Tamber, Filip Ralevski, Dylan R Pillai.   

Abstract

Acanthamoeba spp. are responsible for a significant annual number of keratitis (AK) cases leading to vision-threatening disease worldwide. Current methods rely on direct examination of specimens by microscopy and/or culture. The former lacks sensitivity and the latter suffers from a poor turnaround time. We undertook a comparison of all published molecular methods, evaluating performance characteristics such as analytical sensitivity, specificity, limit of detection (LOD), reproducibility, accuracy, and cost of test. The study population comprised 128 patients. Eligible specimens were tested prospectively between April 2007 and May 2010 by microscopy and/or culture. Eleven different specimen types were used including corneal scrapings (51.5%), corneal swab (17.9%), and contact lens material (10.9%). Results of 2 published gel-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and 2 published real-time quantitative (Q) PCR methods were compared in a blinded manner to direct microscopic examination and/or culture for the detection of Acanthamoeba in clinical specimens. QPCR (Riviere method) had the highest sensitivity at 89.3%, excellent accuracy using ROC analysis (AUC ∼0.90), lowest LOD down to 0.1 organism per microliter, and superior linear correlation with parasite density (R(2) = 0.9965) when compared with microscopy, culture, and other molecular methods. Phylogenetic analysis using a sequence-based typing method revealed that clinical isolates in this population with AK were genetically distinct from granulomatous amebic encephalitis or environmental isolates. The QPCR method was more expensive ($14.80) than traditional methods such as culture ($2.50) or microscopy ($2.50). However, 13 culture- and microscopy-negative specimens were positive by QPCR during the study period, suggesting that detection using QPCR may result in reduced complications and health care costs associated with misdiagnosed AK.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21658877     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  9 in total

1.  Use of multiple immunosuppressive agents in recalcitrant ACANTHAMOEBA scleritis.

Authors:  Estera Igras; Conor Murphy
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-15

2.  Role of molecular diagnostics in ocular microbiology.

Authors:  Parisa Taravati; Deborah Lam; Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Molecular diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis: evaluation in rat model and application in suspected human cases.

Authors:  Adriana Oliveira Costa; Cinthia Furst; Lucas Oliveira Rocha; Cecília Cirelli; Carolina Neris Cardoso; Fagner Salmazo Neiva; Cynara Oliveira Possamai; Daniel de Assis Santos; Vanete Thomaz-Soccol
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Reevaluation of an Acanthamoeba Molecular Diagnostic Algorithm following an Atypical Case of Amoebic Keratitis.

Authors:  Rachel Lau; Marlou Cunanan; Jonathan Jackson; Ibne Karim M Ali; Ann Chong-Kit; Jason Gasgas; Jinfang Tian; Filip Ralevski; Andrea K Boggild
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The role of domestic tap water on Acanthamoeba keratitis in non-contact lens wearers and validation of laboratory methods.

Authors:  Ismail Soner Koltas; Fadime Eroglu; Elif Erdem; Meltem Yagmur; Ferdi Tanır
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  The Risk Factors and Clinical Features of Acanthamoeba Keratitis: First Time Detection of Acanthamoeba T5 Genotype from Keratitis Patients in Turkey.

Authors:  Derya Dirim Erdogan; Mehmet Aykur; Nur Selvi Gunel; Melis Palamar; Ozlem Barut Selver; Buket Ozel; Ayse Yagci; Cumhur Gunduz; Hande Dagci
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 1.534

7.  Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis in Mashhad, Northeastern Iran: A Gene-Based PCR Assay.

Authors:  Nazgol Khosravinia; Abdolmajid Fata; Elham Moghaddas; Bibi Razieh Hosseini Farash; Mohammad Reza Sedaghat; Ali Raza Eslampour; Lida Jarahi
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.012

8.  Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis.

Authors:  Benjamin Clarke; Arti Sinha; Dipak N Parmar; Evripidis Sykakis
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 9.  Detection of microorganisms in granulomas that have been formalin-fixed: review of the literature regarding use of molecular methods.

Authors:  Jeannette Guarner
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.