Literature DB >> 28250209

Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths.

Frank van Langevelde1, Roy H A van Grunsven2,3, Elmar M Veenendaal2, Thijs P M Fijen4,2.   

Abstract

One major, yet poorly studied, change in the environment is nocturnal light pollution, which strongly alters habitats of nocturnally active species. Artificial night lighting is often considered as driving force behind rapid moth population declines in severely illuminated countries. To understand these declines, the question remains whether artificial light causes only increased mortality or also sublethal effects. We show that moths subjected to artificial night lighting spend less time feeding than moths in darkness, with the shortest time under light conditions rich in short wavelength radiation. These findings provide evidence for sublethal effects contributing to moth population declines. Because effects are strong under various types of light compared with dark conditions, the potential of spectral alterations as a conservation tool may be overestimated. Therefore, restoration and maintenance of darkness in illuminated areas is essential for reversing declines of moth populations.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Lepidoptera; feeding behaviour; moth population declines; nocturnal light pollution; sublethal effect

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28250209      PMCID: PMC5377031          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat.

Authors:  Franz Hölker; Christian Wolter; Elizabeth K Perkin; Klement Tockner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Feeding and hemolymph trehalose concentration influence sex pheromone production in virgin Heliothis virescens moths.

Authors:  Stephen P Foster; Chris P Johnson
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Migration of moth species in a network of small islands.

Authors:  Marko Nieminen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Apple and sugar feeding in adult codling moths, Cydia pomonella: effects on longevity, fecundity, and egg fertility.

Authors:  Erik J Wenninger; Peter J Landolt
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

6.  Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; John Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.528

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Light at Night and Disrupted Circadian Rhythms Alter Physiology and Behavior.

Authors:  Jacob R Bumgarner; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.392

3.  Moths complement bumblebee pollination of red clover: a case for day-and-night insect surveillance.

Authors:  Jamie Alison; Jake M Alexander; Nathan Diaz Zeugin; Yoko L Dupont; Evelin Iseli; Hjalte M R Mann; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.812

Review 4.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Nocturnal city lighting elicits a macroscale response from an insect outbreak population.

Authors:  Elske K Tielens; Paula M Cimprich; Bonne A Clark; Alisha M DiPilla; Jeffrey F Kelly; Djordje Mirkovic; Alva I Strand; Mengyuan Zhai; Phillip M Stepanian
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders.

Authors:  Suet Wai Yuen; Timothy C Bonebrake
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Dim artificial light at night reduces the cellular immune response of the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  Joanna Durrant; Mark P Green; Therésa M Jones
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.262

9.  Pollination and fruit infestation under artificial light at night:light colour matters.

Authors:  Michiel P Boom; Kamiel Spoelstra; Arjen Biere; Eva Knop; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.