Literature DB >> 33784873

Nocturnal city lighting elicits a macroscale response from an insect outbreak population.

Elske K Tielens1, Paula M Cimprich2,3, Bonne A Clark2,3, Alisha M DiPilla2,3, Jeffrey F Kelly1,2,3, Djordje Mirkovic4, Alva I Strand1,2,3, Mengyuan Zhai1,5, Phillip M Stepanian6.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic environmental change affects organisms by exposing them to enhanced sensory stimuli that can elicit novel behavioural responses. A pervasive feature of the built environment is artificial nocturnal lighting, and brightly lit urban areas can influence organism abundance, distribution and community structure within proximate landscapes. In some cases, the attractive or disorienting effect of artificial light at night can draw animals into highly unfavourable habitats, acting as a macroscale attractive ecological sink. Despite their significance for animal ecology, identifying cases of these phenomena and determining their effective scales and the number of organisms impacted remains challenging. Using an integrated set of remote-sensing observations, we quantify the effect of a large-scale attractive sink on nocturnal flights of an outbreak insect population in Las Vegas, USA. At the peak of the outbreak, over 45 million grasshoppers took flight across the region, with the greatest numbers concentrating over high-intensity city lighting. Patterns of dusk ascent from vegetated habitat toward urban areas suggest a daily pull toward a time-varying nocturnal attractive sink. The strength of this attractor varies with grasshopper density. These observations provide the first macroscale characterization of the effects of nocturnal urban lighting on the behaviour of regional insect populations and demonstrate the link between insect perception of the built environment and resulting changes in spatial and movement ecology. As human-induced environmental change continues to affect insect populations, understanding the impacts of nocturnal light on insect behaviour and fitness will be vital to developing robust large-scale management and conservation strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthoptera; aeroecology; artificial lights at night; global change; grasshopper; radar entomology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33784873      PMCID: PMC8086988          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  14 in total

1.  Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths.

Authors:  Frank van Langevelde; Roy H A van Grunsven; Elmar M Veenendaal; Thijs P M Fijen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Street lighting: sex-independent impacts on moth movement.

Authors:  Tobias Degen; Oliver Mitesser; Elizabeth K Perkin; Nina-Sophie Weiß; Martin Oehlert; Emily Mattig; Franz Hölker
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Why artificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Tim Smyth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Declines in an abundant aquatic insect, the burrowing mayfly, across major North American waterways.

Authors:  Phillip M Stepanian; Sally A Entrekin; Charlotte E Wainwright; Djordje Mirkovic; Jennifer L Tank; Jeffrey F Kelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  A framework to assess evolutionary responses to anthropogenic light and sound.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Clinton D Francis; Jesse R Barber; Caren B Cooper; Christopher C M Kyba; Davide M Dominoni; Graeme Shannon; Erik Aschehoug; Sarah E Goodwin; Akito Y Kawahara; David Luther; Kamiel Spoelstra; Margaret Voss; Travis Longcore
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  Cloud coverage acts as an amplifier for ecological light pollution in urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Christopher C M Kyba; Thomas Ruhtz; Jürgen Fischer; Franz Hölker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Cascading effects of artificial light at night: resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem.

Authors:  Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; David Cruse; Richard Inger; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

10.  Light pollution is greatest within migration passage areas for nocturnally-migrating birds around the world.

Authors:  Sergio A Cabrera-Cruz; Jaclyn A Smolinsky; Jeffrey J Buler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.